Continuous Review Clause Samples

Continuous Review. The process set out in the Rules should be followed. Specific elements relating to the role of the Overall Review Team (ORT) are set out below. In addition, Review team members should follow the guidelines for Periodic Review Teams to the extent they are applicable in establishing good practice. C.5.3.1. The signatory will provide the Committee with an overall Review programme for the Review period indicating when Accord Review Team visits are likely to occur. The programme will ensure that Accord Review Teams (ART) participate in not less than three accreditation visits within the Review period, where possible to separate educational providers. C.5.3.2. An ART consisting of a subset of the ORT will be formed by the ORT Team leader and the signatory being reviewed for each designated accreditation visit. ART will consist of two ORT members for major accreditation visits or one for smaller visits. The ORT Team leader will appoint one of the ART as the ART Team leader for each review visit. C.5.3.3. Each ART will produce a report, a copy of which will be provided to the signatory being reviewed, members of the ORT and the Committee. C.5.3.4. Any issues or recommendations identified by one ART will be considered by subsequent ARTs, with the signatory under review expected to provide a report on changes made between ART visits. C.5.3.5. The signatory being reviewed must ensure that at least one member of the ORT, in the last two years of the six year Review period, meets with the accreditation / recognition agency, reviews the accreditation / recognition procedures with the agency and observes an accreditation / recognition board decision meeting either physically or non-physically, that is, via electronic or other means. C.5.3.6. All discussions concerning the Review must be held in confidence by the ORT and ARTs as appropriate. C.5.3.7. Prior to the end of the Review period the Chair of the ORT will prepare a summary report and recommendations to the secretariat. A copy of that report must be furnished to each signatory through the secretariat, no later than 90 days prior to the next Annual Meeting of the Accord signatories. C.5.3.8. If, after at least 2 ART visits, but before the end of the Review period, the ORT concludes that there are substantive matters that call into question the substantial equivalence of the accreditation system of the signatory being reviewed, the ORT may prepare a summary report and recommendations to the secretariat. A copy of tha...
View SourceView Similar (7)
Continuous Review. 4.1 The Contractor shall continuously review if the Approved ▇▇▇▇ is used internally in accordance with the respective ▇▇▇▇ License, the Principal's requirements and these provisions. In particular, the Contractor shall regularly examine if a) the ▇▇▇▇ has been published under a new or revised ▇▇▇▇ License; b) the ▇▇▇▇ is used in the goods or services in accordance with the conditions of the ▇▇▇▇ License, the ▇▇▇▇ Disclosure Document and the Principal's requirements; c) the ▇▇▇▇ is included in the goods or services in full, unless the use of parts of the ▇▇▇▇ is permitted under the corresponding ▇▇▇▇ License; d) for the ▇▇▇▇, there are corrections, patches or new versions available, e.g. at the authors/ maintainers of the respective ▇▇▇▇, and have the Principal decide if the same shall be used. 4.2 The Contractor shall provide the Principal with all items required to demonstrate the proper fulfilment of the obligations assumed by the Contractor (e.g. ▇▇▇▇ Disclosure Document, source code). 4.3 The Contractor shall report to the Principal on these matters regularly. Unless otherwise agreed, this mean every calendar month.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Continuous Review. B.3.4.1. At the beginning of the six year Review period, three Reviewers from three different signatories, one of whom will be designated the Team leader, must be selected from the persons nominated under section B.3.2.1 by the Committee to form the Overall Review Team (ORT). The secretariat must take all reasonable steps to ensure that none of the persons selected through this process has had any substantial prior involvement in or commitment to the signatory being reviewed. The secretariat will inform those signatories that they will be required to nominate persons who are able to fulfil dual roles as accreditation panel members, and as the Accord Review Team. B.3.4.2. If for any reason a member of the ORT should become unavailable during the Review period, the committee may appoint a replacement Team member following consideration of nominations from the signatory who provided the initial Team member. B.3.4.3. The signatory responsible for the accreditation system to be reviewed must be advised by the secretariat of the proposed composition of the Overall Review Team, and invited to show cause why any member of the ORT is not suitable. In the event that such an objection is lodged, the secretariat must advise the Committee to take such steps as are necessary and appropriate to resolve the objection. If unable to do so, the Committee must consult all signatories before confirming the membership of the ORT. B.3.4.4. The signatory will provide the Committee with an overall Review programme for the Review period indicating when Accord Review Team visits are likely to occur. The programme will ensure that Accord Review Teams (ART) participate in not less than three accreditation visits within the Review period, where possible to separate educational providers. B.3.4.5. An ART consisting of a subset of the ORT will be formed by the ORT Team leader and the signatory being reviewed for each designated accreditation visit. An ART will consist of two ORT members for major accreditation visits or one for smaller visits. The ORT Team leader will appoint one of the ART as the ART Team leader for each review visit. B.3.4.6. Each ART will produce a report, a copy of which will be provided to the signatory being reviewed, members of the ORT and the Committee. B.3.4.7. Any issues or recommendations identified by one ART will be considered by subsequent ARTs, with the expectation that signatory under review will provide a report on changes made between ART visits. B.3.4....
View SourceView Similar (6)
Continuous Review. 4.1 Company must continuously review whether the Approved ▇▇▇▇ is being used in accordance with the corresponding ▇▇▇▇ License, DTNA's requirements and the conditions of this Annex. In particular, DTNA must regularly examine whether: a) the ▇▇▇▇ has been published under a new or revised ▇▇▇▇ License; b) the ▇▇▇▇ is used in goods or services in accordance with the conditions of the ▇▇▇▇ License, the ▇▇▇▇ Disclosure Document and DTNA's requirements; c) the ▇▇▇▇ is included in the goods and services in full, unless the partial use of the ▇▇▇▇ is permitted under the corresponding ▇▇▇▇ License; d) corrections, patches or new versions have been provided for the ▇▇▇▇; to this end, Company shall examine the websites/forums of the authors and the relevant development group in particular. Company shall provide DTNA with the items required to demonstrate the proper fulfilment of the obligations assumed by Company (e.g. ▇▇▇▇ Disclosure Document, source code, tc.). 4.2 Company shall report to DTNA on this matter regularly which means, unless otherwise agreed, every calendar month.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Continuous Review. 4.1 The Supplier shall continuously review if the Ap- proved ▇▇▇▇ is used internally in accordance with the respective ▇▇▇▇ License, the Principal's require- ments and these provisions. In particular, the Suppli- er shall regularly examine if a) the ▇▇▇▇ has been published under a new or re- vised ▇▇▇▇ License;
View Source
Continuous Review. 3.4.1 At the beginning of the six year Review period, three Reviewers from three different signatories, one of whom will be designated the Team leader, must be selected from the persons nominated under section B.3.2.1 by the Committee to form the Overall Review Team (ORT). The secretariat must take all reasonable steps to ensure that none of the persons selected through this process has had any substantial prior involvement in or commitment to the signatory being reviewed. The secretariat will inform those signatories that they will be required to nominate persons who are able to fulfil dual roles as accreditation panel members, and as the Accord Review Team.
View Source
Continuous Review. (a) An Employee placed on an Absence Management Program will be subject to continuous review, and may be removed from the Absence Management Program, at any time, following demonstrated improvement in their attendance pattern. (b) Employees will be advised in writing of the decision to remove them from the Absence Management Program. However, should the Employee again come under notice for an unacceptable attendance pattern, the Employee may be placed back on an Absence Management Program
View Source
Continuous Review. The Chief of the Auburn Fire Department is authorized to make periodic reviews of all cases to determine the claimant's continued eligibility for benefits.
View Source

Related to Continuous Review

  • Continuous Operation The work week shall provide for continuous operation based on a seven (7) day week, twenty-four (24) hours per day.

  • Continuous Operations Any employee or group of employees engaged in an operation for which there is regularly scheduled employment on a twenty-four (24) hour a day, seven (7) day a week basis shall be known as continuous operations employees.

  • Continuous Employment For purposes of this Agreement, the continuous employment of the Grantee with the Company or a Subsidiary shall not be deemed to have been interrupted, and the Grantee shall not be deemed to have ceased to be an employee of the Company or Subsidiary, by reason of (a) the transfer of the Grantee’s employment among the Company and its Subsidiaries or (b) an approved leave of absence.

  • Performance Review Where a performance review of an employee’s performance is carried out, the employee shall be given sufficient opportunity after the interview to read and review the performance review. Provision shall be made on the performance review form for an employee to sign it. The form shall provide for the employee’s signature in two (2) places, one (1) indicating that the employee has read and accepts the performance review, and the other indicating that the employee disagrees with the performance review. The employee shall sign in only one (1) of the places provided. No employee may initiate a grievance regarding the contents of a performance review unless the signature indicates disagreement. An employee shall, upon request, receive a copy of this performance review at the time of signing. An employee’s performance review shall not be changed after an employee has signed it, without the knowledge of the employee, and any such changes shall be subject to the grievance procedure of this Agreement. The employee may respond, in writing, to the performance review. Such response will be attached to the performance review.

  • Performance Reviews Supplier will perform a minimum of one review with Sourcewell per agreement year. The review will cover transactions to Participating Entities, pricing and terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply chain issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.