Contract Award Process Sample Clauses

The Contract Award Process clause outlines the procedures and criteria for selecting and officially granting a contract to a successful bidder or proposer. Typically, this clause details the steps involved, such as evaluation of submissions, notification of the winning party, and any required approvals or documentation before the contract becomes effective. Its core function is to ensure transparency and fairness in the selection process, reducing the risk of disputes and clarifying how and when a contract is formally awarded.
Contract Award Process. Within 270 days of the date LAWA receives an FAA Approval to proceed with the Air Quality Study, LAWA shall complete a Contract Award Process for selection of a contractor to conduct the Air Quality Study. Within 90 days of the contract award, the contractor shall commence the Air Quality Study.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Contract Award Process. Where a provision of this Agreement refers to a Contract Award Process, that process shall be as described in this Section XVI.C. A Contract Award Process is “initiated” on the date the draft protocols and/or scope of work to be included in the RFP is provided to the Coalition Representative. A Contract Award Process is “completed” on the date the BOAC approves the contract award. When a particular commitment is to be required of the selected contractor, that commitment shall be set forth in the RFP and as a material term of the contract. Any re-release of an RFP or re-bidding of a contract shall occur as described in this Section XVI.C.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Contract Award Process. The Designated Procurement Representative will forward the results from the proposal evaluation process, along with a recommendation of firms for an award of a contract, to Island Transit for their approval. Contract award and execution are subject to Island Transit's approval. Each proposal should be submitted with the expectation that the information in it will be used solely to evaluate and final rank the contract award(s). The highest-ranked Firms must be prepared to contract with Island Transit. During the contract negotiation phase, Island Transit will make a good-faith effort to negotiate the best contract possible. If Island Transit and a Firm selected for contract award cannot reach an agreement, Island Transit may formally end negotiations by written notification to the Firm. At Island Transit’s discretion, Island Transit can then enter negotiations with the next apparent highest-ranked Firm and attempt to negotiate a contract with that Respondent.
View Source
Contract Award Process. Within 270 days of the date PA receives an FAA Approval to proceed with the Air Quality Study, PA shall complete a Contract Award Process for selection of a contractor to conduct the Air Quality Study. Within 90 days of the contract award, the contractor shall commence the Air Quality Study.
View Source
Contract Award Process. It is MARCS’ intention to award one contract under the scope of this RFQ and as based on the RFQ Calendar of Events schedule, so long as MARCS determines that doing so is in the State’s best interests and MARCS has not otherwise changed the award date. Any award decision by MARCS
View Source
Contract Award Process. MSD may negotiate a contract between itself and a government funded training agency to provide any of these services not being performed by in-house MSD staff. MSD shall consult with the Signatories in determining the scope of the contract. If MSD does not enter into such a contract with the government funded job training agency within six (6) months of the effective date of this Agreement, MSD shall initiate a Contract Award Process for a contractor to perform the services not being performed by in-house MSD staff.
View Source
Contract Award Process. It is OIT’s intention to award one contract under the scope of this RFQ and as based on the RFQ Calendar of Events schedule, so long as OIT determines that doing so is in the State’s best interests and OIT has not otherwise changed the award date. Any award decision by OIT under this RFQ is final. After OIT makes its decision under this RFQ, all Proposers will be notified in writing of the final evaluation and determination as to their proposals.
View Source
Contract Award Process 
View Source

Related to Contract Award Process

  • CONTRACT AWARD Award shall be made on a lump sum basis to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. The lowest bid will be the bid whose price, after incorporating all accepted alternates, is the lowest responsive bid that was received from a responsible bidder. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of thirty-five days after time has been called on the date of opening except in accordance with the provisions of law.

  • Performance Improvement Plan timely and accurate completion of key actions due within the reporting period 100 percent The Supplier will design and develop an improvement plan and agree milestones and deliverables with the Authority 3.2 The Authority may from time to time make changes to the KPIs measured as set out in paragraph 3.1 above and shall issue a replacement version to the Supplier. The Authority shall give notice In Writing of any such change to the KPIs measured and shall specify the date from which the replacement KPIs must be used for future reports. Such date shall be at least thirty (30) calendar days following the date of the notice to the Supplier.

  • Performance Tests Contractor shall perform Performance Tests in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Agreement and Attachment S.

  • Performance Testing (a) All performance tests of the Project, including any Initial Performance Test required in Section 2 of Appendix VIII, will be performed in accordance with the test procedures set forth in Appendix VIII (“Performance Test”), including additional procedures and protocols related to Performance Testing as mutually agreed between Buyer and Seller (“Test Procedures”). Seller shall bear all costs and receive all revenues, if applicable, associated with all Performance Tests. (b) After the Initial Delivery Date and during the Delivery Term, Buyer will have the right to conduct a Performance Test (“Buyer Performance Test”) no more than once a calendar year to demonstrate whether the Project is capable of delivering the Distribution Services at the Contract Capacity. Within 30 calendar days following a Buyer Performance Test, Seller will have the right to retest the Project with a Performance Test (“Seller Retest”). For the avoidance of doubt, the results of any Seller Retest will supersede the results of the preceding Buyer Performance Test. (i) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at or above ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, the Contract Capacity will remain the Initial Contract Capacity; (ii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at more than or equal to eighty-five (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, but less than ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity (“Testing Band”), the Contract Capacity will be automatically adjusted (upwards or downwards) to the capacity commensurate with the amount of Distribution Services the Project delivered during the Performance Test within the Testing Band. (iii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is not capable of delivering Distribution Services of at least eighty-five percent (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, an Event of Default shall occur in accordance with Section 7.1(a)(viii).

  • The Performance Improvement Process (a) The Performance Improvement Process will focus on the risks of non- performance and problem-solving. It may include one or more of the following actions: a requirement that the HSP develop and implement an improvement plan that is acceptable to the Funder; the conduct of a Review; an amendment of the HSP’s obligations; an in-year, or year-end, adjustment to the Funding, among other possible means of responding to the Performance Factor or improving performance. (b) Any performance improvement process begun under a prior service accountability agreement that was not completed under the prior agreement will continue under this Agreement. Any performance improvement required by a Funder under a prior service accountability agreement will be deemed to be a requirement of this Agreement until fulfilled or waived by the Funder.