Cost Comparison Sample Clauses

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Cost Comparison. A summary showing the Project cost compared to similar size and type projects recently built in the region under similar conditions, or a statement that no such comparable projects have been identified. Information regarding projected operating and maintenance costs of the facility or (in the case of renovation) the projected impact of the project on operating and maintenance costs.
Cost Comparison. If an Incremental Energy Bid or Minimum Generation Bid submitted on behalf of a NYCA Resource exceeds $1,000/MWh and complies with the requirements of Sections 23.7.3 (for Generators) or 23.7.4 (for Demand Side Resources) below, then the ISO shall compare the Bid to a cost-based reference level developed in accordance with Sections 23.3.1.4.1.3 and/or 23.3.1.4.2.1, and 23.3.1.4.6 of these Mitigation Measures for Generators, or in accordance with Section 23.7.4 for Demand Side Resources, to determine if it must apply a Bid Restriction. 23.7.2.1 If any component of an Incremental Energy Bid exceeds $1,000/MWh or if a Minimum Generation Bid exceeds $1,000/MWh, then the ISO shall use cost- based reference levels to determine if a Bid Restriction should be applied, and to test all components of the Incremental Energy Bid or the Minimum Generation Bid for possible mitigation in accordance with these Mitigation Measures. 23.7.2.1.1 The ISO does not ordinarily include adders above cost in cost-based reference levels. See Section 23.3.1.4.1.3 of these Mitigation Measures. If the ISO ever decides to allow adders above cost to be included in the cost-based based reference levels it uses to determine if a Bid Restriction should be applied, then the combined impact of all of the adders above cost included in the reference level(s) shall be limited to no more than $100/MWh. 23.7.2.2 If the cost-based reference level the ISO uses to perform the comparison is less than or equal to $1,000/MWh, then the ISO shall restrict the Incremental Energy Bid or Minimum Generation Bid that exceeds $1,000/MWh to $1,000/MWh. Some components of an Incremental Energy Bid curve might exceed $1,000/MWh while other components of the Bid curve might be less than $1,000/MWh. If so, the Bid Restriction will apply to the components of the Incremental Energy Bid curve that exceed $1,000/MWh, for which the associated cost-based reference level is less than or equal to $1,000/MWh. 23.7.2.2.1 The NYISO shall test all Incremental Energy Bids and Minimum Generation Bids that have been restricted to $1,000/MWh for possible mitigation in accordance with the rules set forth in these Mitigation Measures. 23.7.2.3 If the cost-based reference level the ISO uses to perform the comparison is greater than $1,000/MWh but not more than $2,000/MWh, then the ISO shall use the Incremental Energy Bids and Minimum Generation Bids that are less than or equal to that cost-based reference level in its Day-Ahead Market o...
Cost Comparison. USFRS shall report to EPA and MPCA on a quarterly basis whether the project is resulting in cost savings for its customer facilities and what aspects of the XL project produce any savings. A. USFRS shall report to EPA and MPCA on a quarterly basis the following information on the extent to which communication with public stakeholders has been maintained throughout project implementation: 1. The methods used to allow public access to information 2. The mechanisms used to communicate with direct participants and the general public including receiving, documenting and responding
Cost Comparison. ‌ As an Intermediate Procurement, Agency shall award the Price Agreement in accordance with ORS 279B.070, awarding Price Agreements to the Offeror/s whose bid/s will best serve the interests of the Agency, taking into account price as well as considerations including, but not limited to, experience, expertise, product functionality, suitability for a particular purpose and contractor responsibility under ORS 279B.110. At Agencies discretion,
Cost Comparison. Authorized Purchaser may conduct a Product or Service specific comparison based upon price.
Cost Comparison. To be considered for award, Bidder shall offer all the 11 items listed in Attachment A, Exhibit A -Pricing page. Bids that fail to provide every item listed on the Pricing Page shall be deemed non-Responsive and shall not be considered for award. Agency shall award the Price Agreement to the lowest Responsive and Responsible Bidder whose bid substantially complies with the requirements and criteria set forth in this Section. For Bid evaluation purposes, the total estimated annual gas cost will be calculated using the following method: For each item listed in Attachment A, Exhibit A - Pricing Page, Items 1-11, the estimated annual usage amount, provided by Agency, will be multiplied by the price per one Standard Cubic Foot (“SCF”), liters, or pounds as provided by the Bidder. The total estimated annual price of all items will result in the total estimated annual gas cost. For Bid evaluation purposes, the total estimated annual fees and other costs by using the following procedure: For each item listed in Attachment A, Exhibit A - Pricing Page, the estimated frequency, provided by Agency, and multiplied by cost provided by bidder. The total for all items will be calculated by adding together resulting in the total estimated annual amount for fees and other related costs. The total dollar amounts from Exhibit A are to be added together to obtain the total Bid price. DAS PS will evaluate Offers to identify the lowest responsive Offer submitted by a responsible Offeror and not otherwise disqualified. (Refer to ORS 279B.100) Adjustments made to account for reciprocal preferences and percentage of recycled materials incorporated into the Goods will be for Offer evaluation purposes only. (Refer to Section 7.5) No such adjustments shall operate to amend Offeror’s Offer or any Price Agreement awarded pursuant thereto.

Related to Cost Comparison

  • Baseline For purposes of measuring a reduction in net tax revenue, the interim final rule measures actual changes in tax revenue relative to a revenue baseline (baseline). The baseline will be calculated as fiscal year 2019 (FY 2019) tax revenue indexed for inflation in each year of the covered period, with inflation calculated using the Bureau of Economic Analysis’s Implicit Price Deflator.163 FY 2019 was chosen as the starting year for the baseline because it is the last full fiscal year prior to the COVID– 162 See, e.g., Tax Policy Center, How do state earned income tax credits work?, https:// ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇-▇▇- state-earned-income-tax-credits-work/ (last visited May 9, 2021).

  • Cost Containment The Benefit Fund Trustees are directed to explore all reasonable methods of cost containment to minimize the Employer contribution obligations under the contract. In the event Medicare becomes secondary in the application of the retiree benefit plan, the Trustees will take immediate and remedial action to protect the financial integrity of the Plan.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4. READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ at TIPS at ▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇@t ▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇ If the vendor is awarded a contract with TIPS under this solicitation, the vendor agrees to make any Choice of Law c lauses in any contract or agreement entered into between the awarded vendor and with a TIPS member entity to re ad as follows: "Choice of law shall be the laws of the state where the customer resides" or words to that effect. Agreed In the event of litigation or use of any dispute resolution model when resolving disputes with a TIPS member entity a s a result of a transaction between the vendor and TIPS or the TIPS member entity, the Venue for any litigation or ot her agreed upon model shall be in the state and county where the customer resides unless otherwise agreed by the parties at the time the dispute resolution model is decided by the parties. Agreed

  • Definition of Operating Expenses Operating Expenses" shall mean and include all expenses incurred and payable in connection with the ownership, operation, maintenance, repair and management of the Premises and the improvements thereon and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, shall include:

  • Cost Control The Construction Manager shall develop a system of cost control for the Work, including regular monitoring of actual costs for activities in progress and estimates for uncompleted tasks and proposed changes. The Construction Manager shall identify variances between actual and estimated costs and report the variances to the Owner and Architect, and shall provide this information in its monthly reports to the Owner and Architect, in accordance with Section 3.3.2.3 above.