Design Review Process Clause Samples

Design Review Process. A. Design Review Components of the Initial Rehabilitation of the Undertaking may be developed on different schedules and may be reviewed individually. The Design Review Process does not preclude these component designs from advancing individually. The development of the Preliminary and Final Design for the Undertaking shall be advanced by GSA and ▇▇▇▇▇ as follows, prior to the commencement of construction:

Design Review Process. 1. AFRH shall ensure that the design review process described in Appendix G is followed for the review of federally- or privately-funded projects proposed by an Action Agent on federally-owned land at AFRH-W. A graphic flowchart of this process is shown in Appendix H 2. The design review process shall be initiated upon execution of the appropriate SOP, as defined in Chapter 6 of the HPP.

Design Review Process. (i) Recognizing the importance of the visual impact of the WWTP, and respecting the Development Permit requirements of the Township’s Official Community Plan, the CRD agrees to involve the City of Victoria, along with the Township, in a collaborative design review process involving the three (3) shortlisted proponent teams relating to the exterior design and finish of the WWTP, with the intent that such discussions will result in concurrence among the CRD, the Township’s staff and the City of Victoria. It is intended to hold the collaborative design review process during October and November 2013, in advance of the final submissions from the proponent teams. (ii) As the design review process will take place during the competitive RFP process, participants including those from the Township shall sign a confidentiality agreement prior to participating in the design review process. The parties acknowledge that such agreement cannot be applicable to the exercise of the Township’s statutory powers in relation to the required development permit(s). (iii) The CRD recognizes that the Project Lands are designated a development permit area in accordance with the Local Government Act and therefore the final decision on design and permit issuance rests with the Township’s Council (subject however to appeals, judicial review and the authority of the Minister of Environment under the Environmental Management Act). The CRD will bring forward the final design as part of its development permit application for consideration by Township Council, but is free to seek input from Council in advance.

Design Review Process. From time to time, as identified in the applicable Schedule, the parties will have design review meetings. ADC will be actively involved in the critical design review for each Product to be developed hereunder.

Design Review Process. A. The Navy will receive for review three submissions from the designer. The submissions will occur at 20%, at 35% and at 65% design. The Navy will provide the SHPO with anticipated dates of the submissions within 90 calendar days of signature of this document. B. The Navy will provide the SHPO with a hard copy of the 20% design. The Navy will then offer to host a site visit and review meeting with the SHPO. The SHPO will have fifteen (15) calendar days before the site visit to review the 20% design. The SHPO will submit written comments to the Navy within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the 20% design. The Navy will take into account and incorporate the SHPO’s comments to the maximum extent possible. C. The Navy will provide the SHPO with a hard copy of the 35% design. The Navy will then offer to host a site visit and review meeting with the SHPO. The SHPO will have fifteen (15) calendar days before the site visit to review the 35% design. The SHPO will submit written comments to the Navy within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the 35% design. The Navy will take into account and incorporate the SHPO’s comments to the maximum extent possible. D. The Navy will provide the SHPO with a hard copy of the 65% design. The Navy will then offer to host a site visit and review meeting with the SHPO. The SHPO will have fifteen (15) calendar days before the site visit to review the 65% design. The SHPO will submit written comments to the Navy within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the 65% design. The Navy will take into account and incorporate the SHPO’s comments to the maximum extent possible. E. The Navy and the SHPO acknowledge that it is their desire and intent to ensure that the Undertaking avoids and satisfactorily minimizes the potential for adverse effects on historic properties. To meet this goal, the Navy and the SHPO will cooperatively and collaboratively work together throughout the design process to affirm that the Undertaking adheres to the principles established in the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties (36 CFR Section 68). F. If the Navy determines that the Undertaking will have an adverse effect on historic properties, the Navy will continue consultation with the SHPO and the Council in order to minimize and mitigate the adverse effect. Minimization and mitigation measures will be settled upon through an Amendment to this Programmatic Agreement (PA) using the amendment process describe...

Design Review Process. Design-Builder shall furnish the Design Documents to VPRA and obtain VPRA’s Acceptance of the Design Documents in accordance with Section 4.2 of the Technical Provisions. Design-Builder shall obtain VPRA’s Acceptance of the Issued for Construction Documents in accordance with section 4.2.4 of the Technical Provisions prior to commencing construction of the portion of the Project shown in a design submittal. VPRA may review all Design Documents for compliance with the requirements of the Contract Documents and provide comments on all Design Documents. If Design-Builder believes incorporating VPRA’s comments would cause the Issued for Construction Documents, other Design Documents, or any Contract Documents to contain errors or would otherwise adversely affect the design or construction of the Project, then Design-Builder shall notify VPRA in response to VPRA’s comments. VPRA will have the right to modify its comments. If Design-Builder fails to notify VPRA as required by this section, then Design-Builder accepts all responsibility for VPRA’s changes to the Issued for Construction Documents and other Design Documents, and those changes will be treated as if Design-Builder had initiated those changes.

Design Review Process a. Project Documents - GSA includes the project description and design documents in Attachment A of this Agreement. Attachment A reflects the recommendations made by Consulting Parties during consultation for avoidance, minimization and mitigation measures. All appended documents shall include a date and time stamp. b. Changes or Modifications - Should alterations to the design occur, GSA shall review the plans for the potential for new or intensified adverse effects. i. GSA shall submit a description of the alterations, its finding of effects, and the revised plans to the Consulting Parties. ii. Consulting Parties shall have 15 days to review and provide written comments to GSA. iii. Should GSA object to any comments, GSA will provide the Consulting Parties with a written explanation of its objection and will initiate consultation with the Consulting Parties to resolve the objection(s). iv. If no agreement is reached within 30 calendar days following receipt of GSA’s written explanation, GSA will follow the Dispute Resolution process described in Section VI below. v. If Consulting Parties do not provide written comments within the aforementioned time period, GSA may assume that no comments are forthcoming and may proceed in accordance with its Project Documents. vi. Should any new or intensified adverse effects be identified, GSA will initiate consultation with the Consulting Parties to resolve those effects through an amendment to this MOA in accordance with Section VI below.

Design Review Process. 5.1 Developer shall complete the design of the Project in accordance with the Conceptual Site Plan and this Article 5. Developer shall design the publicly accessible structures and residential component to, at a minimum, (a) comply with the City’s Mandatory Green Building Practices, as set forth in Section 151.50, et seq., of the City Code of Ordinances, and (b) achieve the standards for a Florida Green certification from the Florida Green Building Coalition, or an equivalent or greater certification from the U.S. Green Building Council, or any other substantially equal or better green-building certification approved by the City (“Green Certification”). Developer shall provide the City with copies of all final records and reports relative to the Green Certification. Any changes to the Conceptual Site Plan that constitute a Material Design Change are subject to City’s prior review and approval in its proprietary capacity under this Agreement, which shall be rendered in accordance with the Deemed Approval Process and this Article 5. Any changes to the Project (and corresponding changes to the Conceptual Site Plan) that do not constitute a Material Design Change or that are required to achieve the Green Certification shall not require City’s approval under this Article 5. The Developer shall, at its sole cost, make its consultants (architects, engineers, etc.) available for regular design and construction meetings for coordination with City staff throughout the design process as is customarily required for the design of Public Facilities, at all stages. 5.2 Developer shall submit a complete application package for the Minimum Project Entitlements to City’s Technical Advisory Committee (“TAC”) for review and approval, which package shall include the Conceptual Site Plan and all other plans and specifications required to be submitted to any Governmental Authority with jurisdiction (“Master Development Plan”). TAC review and approval of the Master Development Plan shall be rendered in accordance with the City Code and all other applicable County, State and Federal laws. ▇▇▇ has the right to request changes to the Master Development Plan provided that such changes do not prohibit the development of the Project. Developer shall be required to make any changes requested by TAC as set forth above. If such changes are requested, Developer shall revise the Master Development Plan to address the same and resubmit to TAC for its approval. If further changes to the resub...

Design Review Process. Design-Builder shall furnish the Design Documents to VPRA and obtain VPRA’s Acceptance of the Design Documents in accordance with Section 4.2 of the Technical Provisions. Design-Builder shall obtain VPRA’s Acceptance of the Issued for Construction Documents in accordance with