Design Thinking Clause Samples

Design Thinking. Understanding How Designers Think and Work, ▇▇▇- ▇▇▇, UK, Bloomsbury Publishing. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. 1996. Essence of backcasting. Futures, 28, 813–828. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇., ▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇. & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, B. B. 2016. Realist theory construction for a mixed method multilevel study of neighbourhood context and postnatal depression. Springerplus, 5, 1081. ▇▇▇▇, M., ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, T., ▇▇▇▇, T., ▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. & ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, J. 2002. Rethinking local housing policies and energy planning: The importance of contextual dynamics. Built Environment (1978), 28, 46–56. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. 2011. Sustainability: Design for the pluriverse. Development, 54, 137–140. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the ▇▇▇▇, ▇. & ▇▇▇, H. 2013. Methods of Sustainability Research in the Social Sciences, London, UK, SAGE Publications. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, P. 2013. Researching Sustainability: A Guide to Social Science Methods, Practice and Engagement, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, UK, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Friend, ▇. & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, A. U. 2005. Planning under Pressure, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, UK, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, A. I., ▇▇▇▇, C., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, P. 2016. Identifying and addressing challenges faced by transdisciplinary research teams in climate change research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 55–64.
View Source
Design Thinking. This project is all about thinking like a designer. Students work with small and large group tasks and individual research activities to dig deep into the design world. The content will cover the fields of visual design, interaction design, user experience design, and service design. Design is about problem solving, storytelling, and the application of insights to a meet a challenge. Students should aim to understand the role of the designer in the production process, the importance of optimisation for design refinement, and how to work with living, breathing projects. Having developed design thinking skills, students move to look at the digital tools that are available for them to create with. This is not a coding project, but developing an understanding of developers and how people make things digitally is crucial. This project will include some basic prototyping with digital tech, research and discussions around big data and its implications on society, and working with emerging global technologies and the impact they will have in the future. Business Strategy In a world disrupted by digital technologies, businesses need to change the way they work. This project focuses on the fundamentals of how businesses need to operate now, and how existing business models can be transformed. In a networked world it’s crucial to develop a global perspectives of business strategy. Students will think locally, regionally, and globally, to develop a broad understanding of business needs. Startup With the key foundations of design, technology, and business covered, students will apply lessons from the previous projects in a larger, more open exploration of startup culture, brand communication, and entrepreneurship. Student groups will work to develop a new business, and apply principles of brand communication to build a business that solves a real problem. Their challenge will be to generate solutions to that problem, and communicate it to the world. Work-Based Project This is the culmination of all the work you’ve done through your course. Taking the lessons you learned from the group and individual work and applying them to test ideas, challenge theories, and develop your specialist skills and knowledge. This could be as a traditional written dissertation, or through a portfolio of different things 4) Course schedule with modules and/or subjects 1. Hyper Island Way Week 7th April 2014 2. Design Thinking 21st April 2014 3. Digital Technology 26th May 2014 4. Advanced W...
View Source
Design Thinking. It will be useful to spend time looking at the philosophy of design thinking as this underpins and influences many of the approaches which will be covered in the training. For instance it would be valuable to explore the Design Council’s ‘Double Diamond,’ which has been hugely influential in design thinking. The graphic below1 shows the key phases in a design project. In the first phase (discover, define), the problem is identified, in the second (develop, deliver), solutions are found. The shift from divergent to convergent thinking in both phases is represented by the widening and narrowing of the lines: The distinction between divergent and convergent thinking – creating and reducing ideas – is central to design thinking. In the divergent phase, the emphasis is on generating as many ideas as possible. In the convergent phase, ideas are mixed, distilled, evolved, parked or discarded. These divergent and convergent processes require different techniques, skills and mindsets. Many of us prefer one to the other and this is a useful thing to reflect upon as a workshop facilitator. With divergent thinking, the emphasis is on encouraging open thinking, creating a judgement-free environment (e.g. avoiding descriptions like ‘good’ or ‘bad’ when discussing ideas) and supporting the group if it feels uncertain or confused. With convergent thinking, the ability to synthesise similar ideas and make connections between different themes is important. Design thinking has been influential in Government, shaping the Government Digital Service Standard2 and the Open Policy Making toolkit which was developed by the Policy Lab.3 The ‘Policy Lab in a day’4 is a useful resource which could be explored in the training. 1 ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
View Source

Related to Design Thinking

  • Design Development An interim step in the design process. Design Development documents consist of plans, elevations, and other drawings and outline specifications. These documents will fix and illustrate the size and character of the entire project in its essentials as to kinds of materials, type of structure, grade elevations, sidewalks, utilities, roads, parking areas, mechanical and electrical systems, and such other work as may be required.

  • Design Development Phase 1.3.1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Documents, model(s) and any adjustments to the Program of Requirements, BIM Execution Plan or Amount Available for the Construction Contract authorized by the Owner, the Architect/Engineer shall prepare, for approval by the Owner and review by the Construction Manager, Design Development Documents derived from the model(s) in accordance with Owner’s written requirements to further define and finalize the size and character of the Project in accordance with the BIM Execution Plan, “Facility Design Guidelines” and any additional requirements set forth in Article 15. The Architect/Engineer shall review the Design Development documents as they are being modeled at intervals appropriate to the progress of the Project with the Owner and Construction Manager at the Project site or other location specified by Owner in the State of Texas. The Architect/Engineer shall utilize the model(s) to support the review process during Design Development. The Architect/Engineer shall allow the Construction Manager to utilize the information uploaded into Owner’s PMIS to assist the Construction Manager in fulfilling its responsibilities to the Owner. 1.3.2 As a part of Design Development Phase, Architect/Engineer shall accomplish model coordination, aggregation and “clash detection” to remove conflicts in design between systems, structures and components. Architect/Engineer shall utilize Owner’s PMIS to accomplish model coordination and collaborate with Construction Manager in the resolution of critical clashes identified by the Construction Manager. Architect/Engineer shall demonstrate and provide written assurance to Owner that conflicts/collisions between models have been resolved. 1.3.3 The Architect/Engineer shall review the Estimated Construction Cost prepared by the Construction Manager, and shall provide written comments. 1.3.4 Before proceeding into the Construction Document Phase, the Architect/Engineer shall obtain Owner’s written acceptance of the Design Development documents and approval of the mutually established Amount Available for the Construction Contract and schedule. 1.3.5 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare presentation materials including an animation derived from the model(s) as defined in “Facility Design Guidelines” at completion of Design Development and if so requested shall present same to the Board of Regents at a regular meeting where scheduled within the state. 1.3.6 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare preliminary recommended furniture layouts for all spaces where it is deemed important to substantiate the fulfillment of program space requirements, or to coordinate with specific architectural, mechanical and electrical elements. 1.3.7 Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner, if requested, with seeking approval of the Project by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). Such assistance shall include (i) the preparation of a listing of the rooms and square footages in the Project, and (ii) the preparation of project cost information, in accordance with THECB Guidelines. This information shall be provided at the completion of the Design Development Phase when requested by the Owner. The listing of rooms and square footages shall then be updated to reflect any changes occurring during construction and provided to the Owner at Substantial Completion. 1.3.8 At the completion of the Design Development Phase, or such other time as Owner may specify to Architect/Engineer, at Owner’s sole option and discretion, Owner will furnish Architect/Engineer with a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal prepared by Construction Manager based upon the Design Development documents prepared by the Architect/Engineer and approved by the Owner. The Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner and endeavor to further and advocate the Owner’s interests in Owner’s communications with the Construction Manager in an effort to develop a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal acceptable to Owner, in Owner’s sole option and discretion. If the Owner does not accept the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, the Architect/Engineer shall participate with the Owner and Construction Manager in constructability reviews and shall revise the documents as necessary in order to reach an agreement. If the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal exceeds the Schematic Design Phase Estimated Construction Cost prepared by, or otherwise accepted by the Construction Manager due to an increase in the scope of the Project caused by further development of the design documents by the Architect/Engineer to the extent that such could not be reasonably inferred by the Construction Manager from the Schematic Design documents, and Owner directs Architect/Engineer to revise the documents, the Architect/Engineer shall revise the documents at its own expense so that the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal for constructing the Project shall not exceed the Owner’s Amount Available for the Construction Contract and any previously approved Estimated Construction Costs. If it is determined to be in the Owner’s best interest, instead of requiring the Architect/Engineer to revise the Drawings and Specifications, the Owner reserves the right to accept a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that exceeds the stipulated Amount Available for the Construction Contract. The Architect/Engineer shall analyze the final Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal document, together with its supporting assumptions, clarifications, and contingencies, and shall submit a detailed written analysis of the document to the Owner. Such analysis shall include, without limitation, reference to and explanation of any inaccurate or improper assumptions and clarifications. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the Owner’s rejection of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal is not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein. 1.3.9 After the Guaranteed Maximum Price has been accepted, the Architect/Engineer shall incorporate necessary revisions into the Design Development documents. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the revisions are required as the result of inaccurate assumptions and clarifications made in the development of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that are not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein.

  • Engineering Forest Service completed survey and design for Specified Roads prior to timber sale advertisement, unless otherwise shown in A8 or Purchaser survey and design are specified in A7. On those roads for which Forest Service completes the design during the contract, the design quantities shall be used as the basis for revising estimated costs stated in the Schedule of Items and adjusting Timber Sale Account. (a) A7 to show Purchaser’s performance responsibility. (b) The Schedule of Items to include costs of survey and design, as provided under B5.24, and adjust Timber Sale Account, as provided in B5.

  • Design ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Plan and Aligned Budget