Evaluation and Assessment Clause Samples
Evaluation and Assessment. 1. All children and youth referred for services will have received a thorough clinical assessment performed by the CONTRACTOR. This assessment will serve as the basis of the treatment and service plan as developed by the CONTRACTOR.
2. An assessment of the child or youth must be conducted in compliance with the requirements established in the Mental Health Plan (MHP) contract between COUNTY and DHCS, a copy of which will be provided to the CONTRACTOR under separate cover.
3. Children and youth must be active Medi-Cal recipients, with the exception of children and youth referred due to their status in the Child Welfare system. The children and youth served due to their status in the Child Welfare system will be referred by the Child Welfare social worker but must meet medical necessity to receive treatment. COUNTY will verify Medi-Cal eligibility prior to commencement of services. CONTRACTOR shall verify that the child/youth continues to be an active Medi-Cal recipient throughout the course of services.
4. The assessment must establish medical necessity for the child or youth as defined in the California Code of Regulations, Title 9, which guides service and documentation provisions. Further, medical necessity must be maintained for all services provided, and for the timeframe in which the services were provided. Medical Necessity includes three elements: a covered DSM-V diagnosis, significant impairment in an important area of life functioning or development, and an ability to benefit from the proposed specialty mental health intervention. The CONTRACTOR may use either its own assessment form or the COUNTY Biopsychosocial Assessment form, CARE 015.
5. A client plan must be developed and maintained for the child or youth that meets all client plan requirements established in the MHP. The CONTRACTOR may use either its own client plan form, if it has all the Medi-Cal required elements, or the COUNTY USP CARE 008 form. Individual client plans shall be developed no less than annually.
Evaluation and Assessment. The Provider agrees to provide ISD with copies of any evaluation or assessment results for any ISD dual-enrolled students served by Provider subject to this Contract or for any classroom-based evaluation or assessment for a class that includes ISD dual-enrolled students. The Provider further agrees ISD shall have the right to conduct assessments of all dual-enrolled students provided educational services under this Contract; and Provider shall fully cooperate with any assessments conducted by ISD.
Evaluation and Assessment i. BSU and the County will regularly evaluate and assess the outcomes and impact of collaborative efforts.
ii. The Parties will engage in ongoing discussions to identify areas of improvement and further opportunities for collaboration.
Evaluation and Assessment. An evaluation plan has been developed to provide data which will identify student progress, be used as a part of the evaluation of the Charter School's effectiveness, and as the basis for continuous improvement of the school's program.
Evaluation and Assessment. Grantor will utilize tools to evaluate all clients receiving advising services. Participation in any program impact reviews and assessments will be directed by the Grantor. Grantee shall maintain records of client activities through the Client Management Database System (the “Center IC”) for compilation and submission to SBA. The Center IC is designed and maintained by the Grantor. Grantee shall work with Grantor to institute such systems as it determines are reasonably necessary to identify small business needs in its service delivery area, to institute programs accordingly and to evaluate program effectiveness.
Evaluation and Assessment. Both the face-to-face training and presentations available on the web programs will include an evaluation component to assess program effectiveness and to modify and enhance curriculum content to achieve project goals. A two-stage evaluation approach will be used to measure both knowledge and behavior changes of individuals participating in the program. Stage 1. A pre-/post-test evaluation strategy will be implemented at the beginning and end of both the face-to-face educational program and web-based training program. The pre-test will ask knowledge-based questions and post-test will measure the same knowledge-based questions to determine the knowledge increase of participants. In addition, the post- test will include 'satisfaction' questions and 'intentions to change or adopt' questions. Stage 2. A six-month follow-up assessment instrument will also be sent to participants via email to complete the assessment and ascertain what practices were actually adopted six months after participating in the program. Results will be summarized in a project final report. Briefs also may be developed to document and enhance the success of future riparian education and similar training programs. Figure 1. Initial Priority Watersheds Task 1 Project Administration Costs Federal $18,000 Non-Federal $12,000 Total $30,000 Objective Administer, coordinate and monitor all work performed under this project including technical and financial supervision and preparation of status and final reports.
Evaluation and Assessment. The ongoing procedures used by appropriate qualified personnel throughout the period of a child's eligibility to identify:
1.9.1 The child's unique needs and strengths;
1.9.2 The resources, priorities, and concerns of the family and identification of supports and services necessary to enhance developmental needs of the children; and
1.9.3 The nature and extent of intervention services needed by the child and the family.
Evaluation and Assessment. All children referred for services shall have received a thorough clinical assessment performed by CONTRACTOR. This assessment shall serve as the basis of the treatment and service plan as developed by CONTRACTOR.
3.1.1. An assessment of the child must be conducted in compliance with the requirements established in the Mental Health Plan (MHP) contract between Placer County and the State Department of Health Care Services, a copy of which will be provided to CONTRACTOR upon request.
3.1.2. CONTRACTOR shall verify Medi-Cal eligibility prior to commencement of services, and verify that the child/youth continues to be an active Medi-Cal recipient throughout the course of services.
3.1.3. The assessment must establish medical necessity for the child or youth as defined in the EPSDT manual, which guides service and documentation provisions. Further, medical necessity must be maintained for all service or services provided, and for the timeframe in which the services were provided. CONTRACTOR shall use the Placer County Biopsychosocial Assessment form, CARE 015.
3.1.4. CONTRACTOR shall conduct a Child and Adolescent Needs and Strengths Preschool Version (CANS) assessment for each child at intake and every six months thereafter to identify the child and family's strengths and needs.
3.1.5. A client plan must be developed and maintained for the child or youth that meets all client plan requirements established in the MHP. CONTRACTOR may use either its own client plan form, if it has all the Medi-Cal required elements, or the Placer County Unified Services Plan CARE 008 form. These shall be developed no less than annually.
Evaluation and Assessment. What types of evaluation will you use to determine if students have mastered the goals for the lesson?
Evaluation and Assessment. The Professor shall provide reasonable input as requested by the student during progress toward these goals. The Professor and the student shall meet in class weekly or as scheduled, and shall have personal meetings and other communications to discuss this learning contract and performance on class assignments. Additional individual feedback shall be provided via email. Meetings with teams of students may also take place in which these goals are discussed. The student will reflect in writing on progress toward these goals in the middle of the semester. At the close of the semester, the student and the Professor will evaluate the success of working toward proficiency with respect to these goals in this contract individually, and consult about the results (in person and/or electronically).