Evaluation of Librarianship Clause Samples

Evaluation of Librarianship. Documentation of performance in librarianship must include, peer observations of instruction, peer reviews of librarianship as described in the candidates’ FAP, student and college faculty evaluation of candidates’ teaching of library research skills during the most recent four (4) quarters, and assessment by the functional supervisor, coordinators and the chair. Evaluations be peers may not be undertaken as anonymous evaluations and must be conducted by individual faculty relative to specific requirements contained in the FAP.
Evaluation of Librarianship. The parties agree that the Library UPRC will adopt clear guidelines for the evaluation of Librarianship by the end of the 2023-2024 academic year, and the evaluation framework will be outlined in the Library Faculty Unit Peer Review Guidelines with an expectation of being in effect for 2024-2025. (a) UNIT PEER REVIEW COMMITTEES AND FACULTY COMMITTEE ON RETENTION, TENURE AND PROMOTION Section 1: Unit Peer Review Committees: a. Unit Peer Review Committees (UPRCs) should have no less than three (3) members and no more than five (5) members. In units where UPRCs review non-tenure track faculty for reappointment and promotion, at least one (1) non-tenure track faculty (consistent with the terms set forth in b. below) must be included on such UPRC. The ▇▇▇▇ of a unit, in consultation with the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, can require that a UPRC have at least five (5) members. In years where tenure reviews are conducted, at least three (3) of the UPRC members shall be tenured faculty. b. The members of a UPRC must be elected by secret ballot from among the full-time faculty in the unit, except that pre-tenure faculty, and Assistant teaching/clinical faculty in their first six (6) years of employment, will not be eligible to serve on a UPRC. If there are not enough members of the unit to constitute the UPRC then the Chair of the unit, in consultation with the ▇▇▇▇ and the UPRC chair can appoint faculty from other units. If this occurs, the Chair or ▇▇▇▇ should strive to appoint faculty from allied disciplines when possible. c. The term of office for members of UPRCs shall normally be two (2) years. To provide continuity, the terms of office shall be staggered. When possible, each member should serve no more than two (2) consecutive terms. d. Non-tenure track faculty on a UPRC shall not review tenure-track faculty and faculty at the Assistant rank will only review faculty for reappointment. e. UPRCs shall base their guidelines for peer review and unit by-laws on the Model Peer Review Plan, issued by the FCRTP. UPRCs may adapt these guidelines to meet the specific disciplinary needs of the unit. f. UPRC guidelines must be approved by the full-time faculty of the unit through a secret ballot vote. g. At least every five (5) years, UPRCs must review their guidelines and decide if modifications are appropriate. If no modifications are recommended by the UPRC, the guidelines will then be adopted without further review provided the full-time faculty of the unit vote to renew the guidelines ...

Related to Evaluation of Librarianship

  • Evaluation of Students A teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of students within the grading policies of the District based upon professional judgment of available criteria pertinent to any given subject area or activity for which the teacher is responsible. No grade or evaluation shall be changed without consultation with the teacher.

  • Implementation of Agreement Each Party must promptly execute all documents and do all such acts and things as is necessary or desirable to implement and give full effect to the provisions of this Agreement.

  • Reproduction of Agreement Copies of this Agreement shall be printed by the Board within thirty (30) days after the Agreement is signed. Copies will then be given to all teachers presently employed, to all teachers hereafter employed, and copies will be available for inspection by any teachers who are considered for employment by the Board.

  • EVALUATION AND MONITORING The ORGANIZATION agrees to maintain books, records and other documents and evidence, and to use accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly support the complete performance of and the full compliance with this Agreement. The ORGANIZATION will retain these supporting books, records, documents and other materials for at least three (3) calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY and/or the State Auditor and any of their representatives shall have full and complete access to these books, records and other documents and evidence retained by the ORGANIZATION respecting all matters covered in and under this Agreement, and shall have the right to examine such during normal business hours as often as the COUNTY and/or the State Auditor may deem necessary. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, and records of matters covered by this Agreement. These access and examination rights shall last for three calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY intends without guarantee for its agents to use reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that related records and documents provided by the ORGANIZATION are not erroneously disclosed to third parties. The COUNTY will, however, disclose or make this material available to those authorized by/in the above paragraph or permitted under the provisions of Chapter 42.56 RCW without notice to the ORGANIZATION. The ORGANIZATION shall cooperate with and freely participate in any other monitoring or evaluation activities pertinent to this Agreement that the COUNTY finds needing to be conducted.

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.