Evaluation of the Candidate Sample Clauses

Evaluation of the Candidate. 1. Each Appointment Review Committee shall evaluate only the candidate’s effectiveness in his/her appointment. 2. Each committee shall consider the following criteria in the course of evaluating the effectiveness of each full-time candidate: a. The candidate’s teaching, advising, and/or counseling skills or skills as librarian; b. The candidate’s ability to work with students; c. The candidate’s ability to work with academic employees and staff (staff input to be provided through administrative representative on the committee); d. The candidate’s knowledge of, or competence in, subject/discipline area; e. The candidate’s adherence to established College policies and procedures; f. The candidate’s general College involvement; g. The candidate’s action toward professional development and improvement; h. The candidate’s participation in curriculum/program development and promotion, which may include up to one-third release time for one (1) or more quarters, as determined by the administrative head and appropriate vice president. 3. Each Appointment Review Committee shall use a four (4)-part evaluation process, which includes the candidate’s annual self-evaluation, quarterly student evaluations by the candidate’s students in all assigned classes, annual peer evaluations, and an annual administrative evaluation by the head of the candidate’s administrative unit. 4. Observations of the candidate while s/he is performing her/his professional responsibilities also shall be part of the evaluation process. During the first quarter of the probationary appointment, student evaluations shall be conducted for all classes. At any point during the first quarter, there shall be at least two (2) classroom observations, one (1) administration and one (1) faculty. In all subsequent quarters, a minimum of one (1) observation per committee member shall be conducted each quarter and shall be scheduled in consultation with the candidate. Additional observations by qualified individuals other than committee members may be requested by the candidate or the committee. Such additional observations shall be limited to specified aspects of the candidate’s role. Qualifications of the individuals selected to observe shall be determined by the Appointment Review Committee. 5. A written evaluation noting the areas of strength and areas needing improvement shall be made for each observation. Within ten (10) working days after the observation, the observer shall meet with the candidate to di...
View SourceView Similar (17)
Evaluation of the Candidate. 10.06.01 The evaluation process shall place primary importance on the candidate’s effectiveness in his/her teaching appointment while considering all the criteria in this section. 10.06.02 Each committee shall consider only the following criteria in the course of evaluating the effectiveness of each candidate in his/her teaching appointment. The candidates shall demonstrate, and document in their Tenure Portfolios, (as described in Article
View SourceView Similar (5)
Evaluation of the Candidate. Evaluation of the candidate should be based solely upon the procedures in this Agreement.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Evaluation of the Candidate. ‌ 10.06.01 The evaluation process shall place primary importance on the candidate’s effectiveness in their teaching appointment while considering all the criteria in this section. 10.06.02 Each committee shall consider only the following criteria in the course of evaluating the effectiveness of each candidate in their teaching appointment. The candidates shall demonstrate, and document in their Tenure Portfolios, (as described in Article 10.07) evidence of continued excellence in each of these areas during each probationary year as appropriate: 10.06.02.01 Excellence in teaching, learning, and assessment: Candidates will be evaluated on Teaching, Learning and Assessment activities such as those outlined in Article 8.05.04.01. 10.06.02.02 Professional Development: Candidates will be evaluated on Professional Development activities such as those outlined in Article 8.05.04.02. 10.06.02.03 Leadership and Service: Candidates will be evaluated on Leadership and Service activities such as those outlined in Article 8.05.04.03.
View Source

Related to Evaluation of the Candidate

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be: a) substantially responsive to the tender documents; and b) the lowest evaluated price. 33.2 Price evaluation will be done for Items or Lots (contracts), as specified in the TDS; and the Tender Price as quoted in accordance with ITT 14. To evaluate a Tender, the Procuring Entity shall consider the following: a) price adjustment due to unconditional discounts offered in accordance with ITT 13.4; b) converting the amount resulting from applying (a) and (b) above, if relevant, to a single currency in accordance with ITT 31; c) price adjustment due to quantifiable nonmaterial non-conformities in accordance with ITT 29.3; and d) any additional evaluation factors specified in the TDS and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. 33.3 The estimated effect of the price adjustment provisions of the Conditions of Contract, applied over the period of execution of the Contract, shall not be considered in Tender evaluation. 33.4 Where the tender involves multiple lots or contracts, the tenderer will be allowed to tender for one or more lots (contracts). Each lot or contract will be evaluated in accordance with ITT 33.

  • Evaluation of Students A teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of students within the grading policies of the District based upon professional judgment of available criteria pertinent to any given subject area or activity for which the teacher is responsible. No grade or evaluation shall be changed without consultation with the teacher.

  • Presentation of Potential Target Businesses The Company shall cause each of the Initial Shareholders to agree that, in order to minimize potential conflicts of interest which may arise from multiple affiliations, the Initial Shareholders will present to the Company for its consideration, prior to presentation to any other person or company, any suitable opportunity to acquire an operating business, until the earlier of the consummation by the Company of a Business Combination or the liquidation of the Company, subject to any pre-existing fiduciary obligations the Initial Shareholders might have.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)