Evaluation Review Sample Clauses
The Evaluation Review clause establishes a process for assessing the performance or progress of a party, project, or deliverable according to agreed-upon criteria. Typically, this clause outlines the timing, methods, and standards for conducting evaluations, such as periodic performance reviews or milestone assessments, and may specify who is responsible for conducting the review and how results are communicated. Its core practical function is to ensure accountability and transparency by providing a structured mechanism for monitoring compliance and progress, thereby enabling early identification and resolution of issues.
Evaluation Review. (a) An Evaluation may be the subject of a review (a “Review”) only if:
i. a Review Form is completed by the Union and submitted to HRS within 10 Working Days from the date the Evaluation outcome is communicated by HRS to the Union. An extension is requested within that period may be granted by HRS; such a request shall be for a maximum extension of 10 Working Days and shall not be unreasonably denied; and
ii. the basis for the Review is that the Evaluation outcome is inaccurate.
(b) HRS shall provide a copy of the completed Review Form to, and solicit comment from the Supervisor unless the Supervisor is in agreement with the Review, evidenced by their signature on the Review Form.
(c) A University Review Committee consisting of University Managers shall consider the information provided by the Union on the Review Form, along with any comments provided by the Supervisor, and shall communicate its decision and rationale to the Supervisor and the Union. If the University Review Committee fails to make a decision within 20 Working Days of receiving the Review Form, the Union may refer the matter to Final Offer Selection Arbitration within the next 10 Working Days but not thereafter.
Evaluation Review. (a) Within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the evaluation, the faculty member may request a review, in writing, with the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ Office to discuss (with the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ or ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ designated administrator) concerns regarding the evaluation, which were not resolved in previous discussions with the Evaluator.
(b) Within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of the evaluation, the academic professional may request, in writing, a meeting with the administrator at the next higher level in their line of authority to discuss concerns regarding the evaluation, which were not resolved in previous discussions with the Evaluator.
(c) The evaluation reviews in (a) and (b) above must take place no later than May 15 unless both the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ Office and the faculty member or academic professional mutually agree to schedule the meeting after May 15.
Evaluation Review. At the request of either party, the evaluator shall have a meeting with the employee following the in-class observation to discuss the evaluation.
Evaluation Review. Evaluations will be reviewed with the employee within ten (10) working days of the evaluation. The employee will have the right to attach a response to the evaluation if the employee disagrees with the evaluation. An employee signature to an evaluation will only indicate that the evaluation has been received by the employee.
Evaluation Review. The Unit member, his/her immediate supervisor, the supervising vice president and the college president shall all sign the completed evaluation form. A copy of the evaluation shall be given to the Unit member and the original shall be forwarded to the District’s Human Resources Division for inclusion in the Unit member’s official personnel file. Should the Unit member disagree with any part of the evaluation, he/she may prepare a written statement to be added to the personnel file along with the evaluation.
Evaluation Review. The supervisor, upon completing the evaluation form, shall review the evaluation with the employee and provide a copy of the evaluation to the employee. Such review will be scheduled at a mutually acceptable time. If the employee disagrees with the evaluation, he/she may submit a written statement which shall be attached to the file copy of the evaluation and/or submit any complaints through the grievance procedure.
Evaluation Review. (a) Within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the evaluation, the faculty member may request a review, in writing, with the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ Office to discuss (with the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ or ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ designated administrator) concerns regarding the evaluation which were not resolved in previous discussions with the evaluator. The ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall designate an administrator to meet with the
(b) Within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the evaluation, the academic professional may request, in writing, a meeting with the administrator at the next higher level in their line of authority to discuss concerns regarding the evaluation which were not resolved in previous discussions with the evaluator.
Evaluation Review. Every employee has the right to meet with his or her Manager concerning the results of the performance evaluation. The employee may also request a meeting with the Deputy CEO (or designee) to review the performance evaluation if the overall evaluation is below standard or unacceptable. Such review(s) must follow the formal chain of command established for the Court. The performance evaluation may be modified by or at the direction of the Manager or the Deputy CEO (or designee) if he/she determines that it is unsupported by the facts or if it is determined that the evaluation is arbitrary and/or capricious.
Evaluation Review. In the event an administrator’s evaluation of a teacher becomes the subject of an evaluation review in accordance with provisions of the collective bargaining agreement with teachers the following provisions apply:
1. Upon prior approval by the Superintendent the District shall provide additional secretary time and shall pay reasonable additional costs incurred by an administrator in preparing for an evaluation review committee.
2. No administrator shall be required to sign an evaluation of a teacher which does not represent the administrator’s own judgment.
3. An administrator shall be given a reasonable opportunity to respond in writing to the report of an evaluation committee before the Superintendent’s final disposition. It is understood, however, that fundamental principles of fairness shall require that the teacher be given the same opportunity.
Evaluation Review. (a) An Evaluation may be the subject of a review (a “Review”) only if: