General Observations Sample Clauses

General Observations. The awarded bidder(s) shall be responsible for providing a copy of the report to each respective County departments’ Project Manager. The Project Manager for the Zoo-Miami Lift Stations will design a “Lift Station Maintenance Report for Zoo-Miami Stations” to be used by the bidder for Group 1; copies of these reports will remain at the Zoo-Miami stations.

General Observations. As expected, all the participating countries have adopted or are in the process of adopting relevant national strategies, which are also coherent with the EU strategies. Nevertheless, there is a difference between “adopting” the strategy and “implementing” it. The implementation phase is a step further and seems successful in Spain, Poland, in Slovenia only partially. The result of this fact is the lack of an efficient system approach to the UBC support. Table 1: An overview of future emerging and key enabling sectors

General Observations. All groups Do the competence standards reflect current practice and requirements in the profession? • Do the following aspects work satisfactorily: o Guidance, support and Information for candidates and their mentors on the requirements for professional registration? o Application forms and supporting information? o Types of assessment evidence required? • Are there any barriers to the registration process for individuals and/or specific groups? • What training have assessors received? • Was it sufficient? • Is the structure of the assessment system appropriate? • Are there sufficient check s and balances to ensure robust, consistent judgments?

General Observations. ‌ Assessors Structure of Assessment GUIDELINES: ANNEX 3‌ Guidelines for Review Reporting Authorized Member under review: Contact details: Review Visit Dates: (‘N/A’ if visit not required) VISIT SCHEDULE: COMPOSITION OF REVIEW TEAM:

General Observations. Upon interrogating the submissions and documents availed to it, the committee made the following general observations;

General Observations. The highest stress point reported from the analysis with E=30*106 was at the elbow located at L25. Higher stress points were not reported, such as at the branch connection L3, for unverifiable reasons. The report states that the "apparent fatigue usage per single maximum flow transient response cycle is 0.3. This translates to a usage factor = 1.5 for the estimated five equivalent dynamic cycles. Compared with the fatigue margin of 20, a usage factor = 1.5 would be acceptable, since the ASME Code Section III would allow up to 25 stress cycles which would exceed Sa @ 106 to be excluded from fatigue consideration for Service Level C condition (NB-3113(b)).” This justification is unclear, and the calculation of the 0.3 fatigue usage factor per dynamic cycle was not reported and cannot be evaluated or verified. The ASME Code Section III design fatigue curves are based on fatigue curves that were obtained from strain-controlled laboratory tests on small polished samples at room temperature in air. The design fatigue curves were calculated from these tests by decreasing the best-fit curves to the laboratory test data by a factor of 2 on strain or 20 on cycles, whichever was more conservative, at each point on the best-fit curve. The ASME Code Section III Stress Criteria document indicates that these factors were intended to account for the differences and uncertainties in relating the fatigue lives of laboratory test specimens to those of actual reactor components, in actual reactor environments. Paragraph NB-3121 of ASME Code Section III, Subsection NB, also states that the data on which the fatigue design curves are based did not include tests in the presence of corrosive environments that might accelerate fatigue failure. As stated in Reference 8, the factors of 2 and 20 are not safety margins but rather conversion factors that were applied to experimental data to obtain reasonable estimates of the lives of actual reactor components. Therefore, the assertion by S&L is not acceptable. A fatigue usage factor > 1.0 implies a crack has initiated and is in the process of propagating. Based on the S&L calculation, the staff concludes that there is a significant probability that cracking will initiate and propagate in the highest loaded component.

General Observations. EVALUATIONS Classroom teachers and support personnel shall be observed/evaluated during each school year in accordance with the procedures and criteria set forth in this Article. Every employee whose work is judged unsatisfactory based upon the observation/evaluation criteria (see Appendix D) shall be placed in a probationary status no later than February 1 and shall be given until May 1 to demonstrate improvement in his/her area(s) of deficiency.

General Observations. Very roughly put, CA displays a subject agreement affix on the complementiser in em- bedded clauses with the verb in final position. For the time being, the term Complemen- tiser Agreement will be used following traditional generative terminology. However, it is important to note that the relevant morpheme in GD cannot only be observed on com- plementisers as such but basically on any element7 introducing the embedded clause (cf. also ▇▇▇▇ 2005). Hence, complementiser is to be understood as denoting the C-domain rather than referring to a certain class of elements. Being aware of this inaccuracy, I will for the time being nevertheless continue to use the term CA with respect to the data presented, as linguists are familiar with the notion and hence able to connect it to the relevant phenomenon. The following very stable facts can be observed in verb-final clauses: (3) i. A morpheme obligatorily attaches to the right edge of the C-domain if the subject is either second person singular or plural.

General Observations. As can be gathered from the foregoing, PLAs are of- ten similar in form and contents, even though they can differ in some measure, depending on the na- ture of specific projects and the needs of the parties involved. By entering into a negotiation, the parties come up with terms and conditions that can be satis- factory to both of them, given their respective goals. In this last section of the chapter, we address some of these goals, and their significance in the context of Ontario’s unionized construction. The notion that PLAs are negotiated locally implies a certain measure of liberty, stemming from the ab- sence of a strict framework (as seen in Chapter 3). However, when we take a step back and have a ho- listic look at the contents of all 25 agreements from our sample, we notice much similarity as to the sub- ject-matters covered and even the specific terms and conditions provided. This can be explained (1) by the fact that the parties to many PLAs share sim- ilar goals, and (2) by the existence of a pattern dy- namic among the building trades involved in PLAs. More importantly, we will highlight how the manner in which PLAs come into existence—a real negotia- tion among and between the many stakeholders— add to their value to proponents.