Manner and Content of Denial of Initial Claims Sample Clauses

The "Manner and Content of Denial of Initial Claims" clause defines how an insurer or responsible party must communicate the denial of a claim to the claimant. It typically requires that denials be provided in writing and include specific reasons for the denial, referencing relevant policy provisions or factual findings. This ensures that claimants receive clear, detailed explanations for why their claims were not approved, promoting transparency and enabling claimants to understand their rights or pursue further action if necessary.
Manner and Content of Denial of Initial Claims. If the Plan Administrator denies a claim, it must provide to the Claimant, in writing or by electronic communication: (A) The specific reasons for the denial; (B) A reference to the Plan provision or insurance contract provision upon which the denial is based; (C) A description of any additional information or material that the Claimant must provide in order to perfect the claim; (D) An explanation of why such additional material or information is necessary; (E) Notice that the Claimant has a right to request a review of the claim denial and information on the steps to be taken if the Claimant wishes to request a review of the claim denial; and (F) A statement of the participant's right to bring a civil action under ERISA section 502(a) following a denial on review of the initial denial. In addition, in the case of a denial of disability benefits on the basis of the Plan Administrator's independent determination of the Participant's disability status, the Plan Administrator will provide a copy of any rule, guideline, protocol, or other similar criterion relied upon in making the adverse determination (or a statement that the same will be provided upon request by the Claimant and without charge).
Manner and Content of Denial of Initial Claims. If the Corporation denies a claim, it must provide to the Claimant, in writing or by electronic communication: (i) The specific reasons for the denial; (ii) A reference to the provision of the Agreement upon which the denial is based; (iii) A description of any additional information or material that the Claimant must provide in order to perfect the claim; (iv) An explanation of why such additional material or information is necessary; (v) Notice that the Claimant has a right to request a review of the claim denial and information on the steps to be taken if the Claimant wishes to request a review of the claim denial; and (vi) A statement of the Claimant’s right to bring a civil action under Section 502(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), following a denial on review of the initial denial.
Manner and Content of Denial of Initial Claims. If the Bank denies a claim, it must provide to the Claimant, in writing or by electronic communication: (A) The specific reasons for the denial; (B) A reference to the Agreement provision or insurance contract provision upon which the denial is based; (C) A description of any additional information or material that the Claimant must provide in order to perfect the claim; (D) An explanation of why such additional material or information is necessary; (E) Notice that the Claimant has a right to request a review of the claim denial and information on the steps to be taken if the Claimant wishes to request a review of the claim denial; and (F) A statement of the Executive’s right to bring a civil action under Section 502(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”) following a denial on review of the initial denial. In addition, in the case of a denial of Disability benefits on the basis of the Bank’s independent determination of the Executive’s Disability status, the Bank will provide a copy of any rule, guideline, protocol, or other similar criterion relied upon in making the adverse determination (or a statement that the same will be provided upon request by the Claimant and without charge).
Manner and Content of Denial of Initial Claims. If the Employer, administrator or other delegate denies a claim, it must provide to the Claimant, in writing or by electronic communication: a. The specific reasons for the denial; b. A reference to the Plan provision or insurance contract provision upon which the denial is based; c. A description of any additional information or material that the Claimant must provide in order to perfect the claim; d. An explanation of why such additional material or information is necessary; e. Notice that the Claimant has a right to request a review of the claim denial and information on the steps to be taken if the Claimant wishes to request a review of the claim denial; and f. A statement of the participant’s right to bring a civil action under ERISA §501(a) following a denial on review of the initial denial. In addition, in the case of a denial of Disability benefits on the basis of the Employer’s Administrator’s or other delegate’s independent determination of the Participant’s Disability status, the Employer, Administrator or other delegate, as applicable, will provide a copy of any rule, guideline, protocol, or other similar criterion relied upon in making the adverse determination (or a statement that the same will be provided upon request by the Claimant and without charge).

Related to Manner and Content of Denial of Initial Claims

  • Paid Claims without Supporting Documentation Any Paid Claim for which Practitioner cannot produce documentation shall be considered an error and the total reimbursement received by Practitioner for such Paid Claim shall be deemed an Overpayment. Replacement sampling for Paid Claims with missing documentation is not permitted.

  • Attachments, inconsistencies and severability This Consortium Agreement consists of this core text and Attachment 1 (Background included) Attachment 2 (Accession document) Attachment 3 (List of Third Parties for simplified transfer according to Section 8.2.2) Attachment 4 (Identified Affiliated Entities) In case the terms of this Consortium Agreement are in conflict with the terms of the Grant Agreement, the terms of the latter shall prevail. In case of conflicts between the attachments and the core text of this Consortium Agreement, the latter shall prevail. Should any provision of this Consortium Agreement become invalid, illegal or unenforceable, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Consortium Agreement. In such a case, the Parties concerned shall be entitled to request that a valid and practicable provision be negotiated which fulfils the purpose of the original provision.

  • Limitation on Out-of-State Litigation - Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 This is a requirement of the TIPS Contract and is non-negotiable. Texas Business and Commerce Code § 272 prohibits a construction contract, or an agreement collateral to or affecting the construction contract, from containing a provision making the contract or agreement, or any conflict arising under the contract or agreement, subject to another state’s law, litigation in the courts of another state, or arbitration in another state. If included in Texas construction contracts, such provisions are voidable by a party obligated by the contract or agreement to perform the work. By submission of this proposal, Vendor acknowledges this law and if Vendor enters into a construction contract with a Texas TIPS Member under this procurement, Vendor certifies compliance.

  • Conclusiveness of Statements; Survival of Provisions Determinations and statements of any Lender pursuant to Sections 8.1, 8.2, 8.3 or 8.4 shall be conclusive absent demonstrable error. Lenders may use reasonable averaging and attribution methods in determining compensation under Sections 8.1 and 8.4, and the provisions of such Sections shall survive repayment of the Obligations, cancellation of any Notes, expiration or termination of the Letters of Credit and termination of this Agreement.

  • Placement of DNS probes Probes for measuring DNS parameters shall be placed as near as possible to the DNS resolvers on the networks with the most users across the different geographic regions; care shall be taken not to deploy probes behind high propagation-­‐delay links, such as satellite links.