Monitoring Objectives and Data Evaluation Clause Samples

Monitoring Objectives and Data Evaluation. ‌ The water quality concerns for the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Reservoir reallocation focus on the potential change to water quality conditions (i.e., nutrients and chlorophyll a) based on the expansion of the hypolimnion and inundation of shoreline areas following the increased storage capacity (ERO 2013). There is uncertainty whether the expansion of the hypolimnion will increase the areal coverage of anaerobic sediment conditions and result in increased internal phosphorus loading that may impinge on the Total Maximum Annual Load (TMAL) for the Reservoir. Furthermore, the inundated shoreline vegetation may also increase phosphorus loading to the Reservoir. The following core objectives have provided the basis for the adaptive management plan and the CRP monitoring program (ERO 2013). 1. Internal loading from “new” anoxic sediments attributed to reallocation pool level increases will not cause water quality standards for chlorophyll a and total phosphorus or the total phosphorus TMAL to be exceeded. 2. Internal loading from “newly” inundated vegetation attributed to reallocation pool level increases will not cause water quality standards for chlorophyll a and total phosphorus or the total phosphorus TMAL to be exceeded. 3. Expansion of hypoxic conditions and potential release of reduced contaminants from anaerobic sediments will not cause other water quality standards (i.e., other than chlorophyll a and total phosphorus) to be exceeded. The CRMC and CWA are coordinating their respective objectives to maximize efficiency and minimize costs. The increased spatial coverage of Reservoir monitoring locations and the increased sampling frequency will provide a more complete data set to address the following water quality questions for the Reservoir as well as the future water quality modeling effort of the CRP: 1. Does ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Reservoir meet the growing season total phosphorus and chlorophyll a standard annually? 2. Are total phosphorus loads in compliance with the TMAL? 3. Are the requirements of the CRP Record of Decision on water quality monitoring and analyses satisfied? Water quality data are used to characterize the trophic state of the Reservoir, evaluate trends in the watershed and to assess compliance with basic/site-specific water quality standards and the phosphorus TMAL identified in the control regulation. The in-Reservoir total phosphorus data are used by the Colorado Water Quality Control Division to determine compliance with the total phosphorus standard of ...
View Source

Related to Monitoring Objectives and Data Evaluation

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5.1 The Employee agrees to participate in the performance management system that the Employer adopted for the employees of the Employer; 5.2 The Employee accepts that the purpose of the performance management system will be to provide a comprehensive system with specific performance standards to assist the employees and service providers to perform to the standards required; 5.3 The Employer must consult the Employee about the specific performance standards and targets that will be included in the performance management system applicable to the Employee; 5.4 The Employee undertakes to actively focus on the promotion and implementation of the key performance indicators (including special projects relevant to the employee’s responsibilities) within the local government framework; 5.5 The criteria upon which the performance of the Employee shall be assessed shall consist of two components, Operational Performance and Competencies both of which shall be contained in the Performance Agreement; 5.6 The Employee’s assessment will be based on his performance in terms of the outputs/outcomes (performance indicators) identified as per attached Performance Plan, which are linked to the KPAs, and will constitute 80% of the overall assessment result as per the weightings agreed to between the Employer and Employee; 5.7 The Competencies will make up the other 20% of the Employee’s assessment score. The Competencies are spilt into two groups, leading competencies (indicated in blue on the graph below) that drive strategic intent and direction and core competencies (indicated in green on the graph below), which drive the execution of the leading competencies. Strategic direc on and leadership People management Program and project management Financial management Change leadership Governance leadersip Moral competence Planning and organising Analysis and innova on Knowledge and informa on management Communica on Results and quality focus

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.