Performance Management Regime Overview Clause Samples

The Performance Management Regime Overview clause defines the framework for monitoring, measuring, and evaluating a party’s performance under the agreement. It typically outlines the key performance indicators (KPIs), reporting requirements, and review processes that will be used to assess whether contractual obligations are being met. By establishing clear standards and procedures for performance assessment, this clause ensures accountability and provides a structured approach for addressing underperformance or recognizing achievement.
Performance Management Regime Overview. 2.1 The Performance Management Regime consists of: (A) the PIs; (B) the start and end points for assessment of PIs (where appropriate); (C) the required Service Levels; and (D) the Service Level Deduction Points to be accrued if the required Service Levels are not met, as set out in this Schedule 5. 2.2 The table in Annex A (Performance Indicator Table) to this Schedule 5 sets out the Performance Management Regime parameters for the Operational Services (the “Performance Indicator Table”). The Performance Indicator Table set outs the following details in respect of the Performance Indicators: (A) The ‘Performance Indicator Title’ column in the Performance Indicator Table gives the name of the various Performance Indicators on which the performance of the Service Provider shall be measured, tracked and rewarded or against which Service Failure Points shall accrue. (B) The ‘Start Point’ column in the Performance Indicator Table details the time from when the Performance Indicator shall start to accrue the Service Failure Points (the “Start Point”). (C) The ‘End Point’ column in the Performance Indicator Table details the time at which the relevant Performance Indicator ceases to be subject to Service Failure Points (the “End Point”). (D) The ‘Acceptable Service Level’ column in the Performance Indicator Table specifies the range of operational performance for the Performance Indicator that is expected of the Service Provider (each an “Acceptable Service Level”) for which no Service Failure Points shall accrue. 2.3 Failure to meet the Acceptable Service Level shall result in the Service Provider accumulating Service Failure Points as detailed in the Performance Indicator Table. The number of Service Failure Points accumulated shall depend on the extent to which the Service Provider has failed to meet the Acceptable Service Level for each PI.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Performance Management Regime Overview. 2.1 The performance management regime (“Performance Management Regime”) consists of performance indicators (each a “Performance Indicator” or "PI"), the start and end points for assessment of PIs (where appropriate), the level of service required and the points to be accrued if the required levels of service performance are not met (“Service Failure Points”) as set out in this schedule. Table 1 (Performance Indicators) in this schedule (“Table 1”) sets out the performance management regime parameters for the Services. 2.2 The ‘Performance Indicator Title’ column in Table 1 identifies the various Performance Indicators on which the performance of the Service Provider shall be measured, tracked and rewarded or against which Service Failure Points shall accrue.
View Source
Performance Management Regime Overview. 3.1 The performance management regime consists of the Performance Indicators, the start and end points for assessment of the Performance Indicators (where appropriate), the level of service required and the Service Failure Points to be accrued if the required levels of service performance are not met as set out in this Schedule 6 (“Performance Management Regime”).
View Source

Related to Performance Management Regime Overview

  • Performance Management 17.1 The Contractor will appoint a suitable Account Manager to liaise with the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager. Any/all changes to the terms and conditions of the Agreement will be agreed in writing between the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor’s appointed representative. 17.2 The Contractor will ensure that there will be dedicated resources to enable the smooth running of the Framework Agreement and a clear plan of contacts at various levels within the Contractor's organisation. Framework Public Bodies may look to migrate to this Framework Agreement as and when their current contractual arrangements expire. The Contractor will where necessary assign additional personnel to this Framework Agreement to ensure agreed service levels are maintained and to ensure a consistent level of service is delivered to all Framework Public Bodies. 17.3 In addition to annual meetings with the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager, the Contractor is expected to develop relationships with nominated individuals within each of the Framework Public Bodies to ensure that the level of service provided on a local basis is satisfactory. Where specific problems are identified locally, the Contractor will attempt to resolve such problems with the nominated individual within that organisation. The Authority's Strategic Contract Manager will liaise (or meet as appropriate) regularly with the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager, and where common problems are identified, it will be the responsibility of the Contractor to liaise with the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager to agree a satisfactory course of action. Where the Contractor becomes aware of a trend that would have a negative effect on one or more of the Framework Public Bodies, they should immediately notify the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager to discuss corrective action. 17.4 Regular meetings, frequency to be advised by Framework Public Body, will be held between the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager and the Contractor's representative to review the performance of their Call-Off Contract(s) under this Framework Agreement against the agreed service levels as measured through Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Reports will be provided by the Contractor to the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager at least 14 days prior to the these meetings. 17.5 Performance review meetings will also be held annually, between the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor's representative to review the performance of the Framework Agreement against the agreed service levels as measured through Key Performance Indicators. A summary of the quarterly reports will be provided by the Contractor at least 14 days prior to these meetings. 17.6 The Authority will gather the outputs from contract management to review under the areas detailed in the table below. Provision of management reports 90% to be submitted within 10 working days of the month end Report any incident affecting the delivery of the Service(s) to the Framework Public Body 100% to be reported in writing to FPB within 24 hours of the incident being reported by telephone/email Prompt payment of sub-contractors and/or consortia members (if applicable). Maximum of 30 from receipt of payment from Framework Public Bodies, 10 days target 100% within 30 days

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

  • Program Overview Microsoft extends to eligible partners the opportunity to participate in the Program referenced above subject to these Program Terms & Conditions (“Program Terms”). Each entity participating in the Program is hereinafter referred to as a “Participant.” Participation in the Program is voluntary. The Program is governed by the Program Terms, which incorporate by reference the Microsoft Partner Network Agreement (as in effect between Microsoft and Participant, the “MPN Agreement”). Capitalized terms used but not defined in these Program Terms have the meanings assigned to them in the MPN Agreement. These Program Terms are subject to local requirements and may vary by jurisdiction, and Participant retains sole discretion to set pricing for sales of applicable products.