Process for Determining School Facilities Concurrency Sample Clauses

Process for Determining School Facilities Concurrency. (1) The County and City will accept and process final plats and residential site plans including five (5) or more units only after the applicant has complied with the terms of the County or City’s School Concurrency Ordinance. The County or City may approve a School Concurrency Application earlier in the approval process if requested by the applicant, the School Board reviews and approves the determination, allocations of capacity and proportionate share mitigation commitments as provided in this Subsection. (2) School Concurrency Applications shall be filed with the School Board. Upon the receipt of a complete School Concurrency Application, the School Board will transmit a copy of the application to the City or County in whose jurisdiction the development lies. The School Board shall make a determination whether there is adequate school capacity, for each level of school, to accommodate the proposed development, based on the LOS standards, CSAs, and other standards set forth herein. (3) Within thirty (30) days of the initial application, the School Board will review the School Concurrency Application and, based on the standards set forth in this Agreement, report in writing to the County or City: a. Whether adequate school capacity exists for each level of school, based on the standards set forth in this Agreement; or b. If adequate capacity does not exist, whether appropriate mitigation can be accepted, and if so, acceptable options for mitigation, consistent with this Agreement. (4) If the School Board determines that adequate capacity will not be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the issuance of final subdivision or site plan approval and mitigation is not an acceptable alternative, the County or City will not issue a School Concurrency Determination and will not accept or process a development application. (5) If the School Board determines that adequate capacity does not exist but that mitigation is an acceptable alternative, the development application will remain active pending the conclusion of the mitigation negotiation period described below. (6) The County or City will issue a School Concurrency Determination only upon: a. The School Board’s written determination that adequate school capacity will be in place or under actual construction within 3 years after the issuance of final subdivision or site plan approval for each level of school without mitigation; or the School Board’s written acknowledgement that the payment...
View SourceView Similar (4)
Process for Determining School Facilities Concurrency. The School Board shall coordinate with each Local Government to: (1) establish methodologies and procedures for the review of development proposals subject to school concurrency, including provisions that efficiently integrate school concurrency review into the Local Government’s established process for the review of development proposals; and, (2) maintain records pertaining to the effect of development proposals on school capacity. These procedures shall provide for the certification of school concurrency by the Local Government without review and certification by the School Board for individual developments below thresholds identified in the report, as described in Section 8.5.8, issued by the School Board at least annually. The School Board and each Local Government shall establish procedures specific to the Local Government and consistent with the following guidelines: (a) Development applications which include residential uses must include the number and type of units, and projection of the number of students by type of school based on the student generation rates established by the School Board. Procedures shall provide for a copy of such information to be submitted by applicants to the Local Government and the School Board. (b) If the development proposal meets the criteria for certification by Local Government identified in the School Board report described in Section 8.5.8, separate review and written certification by the School Board is not required. (c) If the development proposal requires review by the School Board, the Local Government will transmit completed applications for development to the School Board for a determination of whether there is adequate school capacity to accommodate the proposed residential development, based on the adopted LOS standards. Transmittal shall occur within five (5) working days of receipt of completed applications. Within ten
View Source
Process for Determining School Facilities Concurrency. The School Board shall coordinate with each Local Government to: (1) establish methodologies and procedures for the review of development proposals subject to school concurrency, including provisions that efficiently integrate school concurrency review into the Local Government’s established process for the review of development proposals; and, (2) maintain records pertaining to the effect of development proposals on school capacity. These procedures shall provide for the certification of school concurrency by the Local Government without review and certification by the School Board for individual developments below thresholds identified in the report, as described in Section 8.5.8, issued by the School Board at least annually. The School Board and each Local Government shall establish procedures specific to the Local Government and consistent with the following guidelines: (a) The School Board staff will review and determine school capacity of each school type as defined in Section 8.1. (b) Development applications which include residential uses must include the number and type of units, and projection of the number of students by type of school based on the student generation rates established by the School Board. Procedures shall provide for a copy of such information to be submitted by applicants to the Local Government and the School Board.
View Source

Related to Process for Determining School Facilities Concurrency

  • Purpose of Interconnection Facilities Except as may be required by Applicable Laws and Regulations, or as otherwise agreed to among the Parties, the Interconnection Facilities shall be constructed for the sole purpose of interconnecting the Large Generating Facility to the Participating TO’s Transmission System and shall be used for no other purpose.

  • Banking Facilities Section 3.6(f) of the Company Disclosure Schedule sets forth an accurate and complete list of (i) each bank, savings and loan or similar financial institution with which the Company has an account or safety deposit box or other similar arrangement, and any numbers or other identifying codes of such accounts, safety deposit boxes or such other arrangements maintained by the Company thereat, and (ii) the names of all Persons authorized to draw on any such account or to have access to any such safety deposit box facility or such other arrangement.

  • Sole purpose of the Concessionaire The Concessionaire having been set up for the sole purpose of exercising the rights and observing and performing its obligations and liabilities under this Agreement, the Concessionaire or any of its subsidiaries shall not, except with the previous written consent of the Authority, be or become directly or indirectly engaged, concerned or interested in any business other than as envisaged herein.

  • Interconnection Facilities Engineering Procurement and Construction Interconnection Facilities, Network Upgrades, and Distribution Upgrades shall be studied, designed, and constructed pursuant to Good Utility Practice. Such studies, design and construction shall be based on the assumed accuracy and completeness of all technical information received by the Participating TO and the CAISO from the Interconnection Customer associated with interconnecting the Large Generating Facility.

  • Fleet In general, any in-house mechanic may be assigned to respond to any emergency during normal working hours in any of the three operating companies. (This does not supersede the Mechanic Personnel Working Across 309 Jurisdictional Boundaries Agreement dated October 4, 2007). Example 1: Lincoln (CILCO) unit breaks down in the northern part of its territory. It would make sense for the Bloomington (rp) mechanic to respond to the service call. Lincoln staffs a 2nd shift mechanic only and the vehicle in need of repair is closer to the Bloomington garage. This example covers areas that both have Ameren in-house mechanics. Example 2: Any CIPS 702 units could be repaired by Ameren staffed mechanics in 702 territories. This would generally happen in areas that are in close proximity to an IP or CILCO garage. This example covers 702 CIPS areas that do not have Ameren in-house mechanics. These jobs currently are outsourced. Perform Preventive Maintenance on CIPS 702 equipment at individual operating centers where advantageous. This work is currently outsourced. It is not the company’s intent to perform all PM’s with in-house mechanics.