Program Management Reviews Sample Clauses

The Program Management Reviews clause establishes a formal process for regularly evaluating the progress and performance of a project or program. Typically, this involves scheduled meetings between the parties to discuss milestones, address issues, and assess whether objectives are being met. These reviews may include the presentation of status reports, identification of risks, and agreement on any necessary corrective actions. The core function of this clause is to ensure ongoing oversight and communication, enabling early identification and resolution of problems to keep the program on track.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 7 times
Program Management Reviews. The Contractor shall conduct monthly Program Management Reviews (PMRs) beginning three (3) months after the award of CLIN 0001. The PMRs, which may be conducted via WebEx or other Government-approved means, shall be documented with conference agendas, conference minutes, and presentation materials per CDRLs A004 and A005. The purpose of the reviews is to ensure that the approach and progress are technically sound, meet the requirements, and are properly documented in the design documentation. Minutes of meetings shall be delivered via CDRL A004 for all meetings that had a formal agenda. The Program Management Reviews shall include but not limited to the following: • Ensure a mutual understanding of the objectives and scope of the work • Review progress to-date • Review metrics • Review project deliverables • Validate detailed work plans • Confirm resolved issues and manage outstanding issues. This shall include status of significant problems faced by the program manager and current plans to resolve the problems or mitigate their impacts • Identify and evaluate risk factors and address areas where risk has changed • Identify problems with Government Furnished Information or Equipment, impacts, and work around plans or solutions • Report on the status of ESOH hazards, Configuration Management activities, design issues and engineering issues that impact system supportability Post Production Readiness Review The Contractor shall address production schedule status, program risks and mitigation strategies and outstanding contract actions, upcoming contract actions and proposed contract actions. In addition to the bullets above, the Contractor shall include scope of work, production order, review progress, metrics, risk factors/changes, project deliverables, validate work plans, confirm resolved issues, manage outstanding issues, and mitigate impacts. The review shall contain an engineering overview to review engineering tasking, ECPs, DMSMS forecasting and resolution, and Failure Summary Analysis Report to document the failure mechanism (root cause) and corrective action of each failure trend identified. The Contractor shall provide a status on ESOH hazards, Configuration Management (CM) activities, design issues and engineering issues that impact system supportability.
View SourceView Similar (9)
Program Management Reviews. The Government anticipates up to two Program Management Reviews (PMRs) per year relating to the resulting IDIQ contracts in which contractors will participate. Location of the PMRs may vary, but will be relevant sites to the M795 Program. The location of the sites should be mutually agreed to by the Government and contractor as the contractor's rotation for hosting the PMR comes up. Each IDIQ contractor will be responsible for hosting one PMR every three to six months. Hosting is defined as securing meeting facilities for up to approximately 50 participants, and ensuring adequate presentation equipment is available.
View Source
Program Management Reviews. The Seller shall conduct the first program review with the Buyer two (2) weeks after receipt of subcontract award from Buyer. Topics to be reviewed at the first program review shall include Seller's schedule management, configuration management, and QA processes setup for this program. Additional program reviews lasting no-more than 1 day shall be conducted quarterly to address all functions: technical, management, administrative, problem identification and resolution, assurance of compliance with contract requirements, program status and tracking. The location of these reviews shall be at the Seller's facility in San Jose, CA unless it is mutually agreeable to both the Seller and Buyer to meet in another location. In addition, special purpose reviews will be scheduled as reasonably required to ensure successful program execution. Summary typewritten minutes shall be prepared by the Seller within one (1) week of each program management review. The Seller/Buyer shall recognize and agree that these Buyer/Seller reviews are solely for the purpose of exchanging and coordinating efforts concerning this procurement and status of the subcontract. Nothing which transpires shall be interpreted, construed or treated by the Seller and/or Buyer as modifying the subcontract Schedule B - 3 Revision D Schedule B Statement of Work unless and until a written subcontract modification is mutually agreed to by the Buyer and Seller.
View Source
Program Management Reviews. The contractor shall present and administratively support Program Management Reviews (PMR). Program Management Reviews (PMR) shall be held once every six months. All PMRs shall be held at a contractor’s facility. The contractor shall develop agendas and minutes for PMRs. The Government will have the right to modify or add items to the PMR agenda. At the PMRs, the contractor shall report detailed program status, including technical performance, program risks, logistics and production metrics.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Program Management Reviews. The Contractor shall conduct Quarterly PMRs. PMRs shall include the following information, at a minimum:  Schedule performance including all completed and planned efforts  Risk management activities and current status (including open items and planned mitigation efforts)  Program Status (progress and/or issues)  A review of all program, contractual, and technical issues  A review of all on-going technical efforts (design, development, test), including cost and schedule performance  A cost data review Of the four PMRs held each year, three shall occur at the Contractor’s facility or a location agreed to by the Government and one will be conducted in the Washington D.C. Area (within 50 driving miles of the Washington Navy Yard). When the PMR is held at the Contractor’s facility, the Contractor shall provide administrative support and access to the facilities to attending Government personnel. The Contractor shall propose date(s) and location no less than 45 days prior to the PMR. The Government will confirm the date(s) and location no less than 30 days prior to the PMR. The Contractor shall submit the PMR agenda, PMR presentations (CDRL A005) and PMR meeting minutes (CDRL A006).
View Source

Related to Program Management Reviews

  • Program Management 1.1.01 Implement and operate an Immunization Program as a Responsible Entity 1.1.02 Identify at least one individual to act as the program contact in the following areas: 1. Immunization Program Manager;

  • Project Management Plan Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work. Developer shall undertake all aspects of quality assurance and quality control for the Project and Work in accordance with the approved Project Management Plan and

  • Program Manager Owner may designate a Program Manager to administer the Project and this Contract. In lieu of a Program Manager, Design Professional may be designated to perform the role of Program Manager. The Program Manager may also be designated as the Owner’s Representative, and if no Owner’s Representative is designated, the Program Manager shall be the Owner’s Representative.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.