Quality Metrics and Reporting for Determining the Retrospective Performance Payment Clause Samples

Quality Metrics and Reporting for Determining the Retrospective Performance Payment i. CMS will review and update the Demonstration core measures and measure specifications annually to ensure compliance with current science and measure development. ii. The State will review and, with CMS approval, update State-specific measures and measure specifications annually to ensure compliance with current science and measure development. Where applicable, CMS will adhere to nationally-endorsed specifications for relevant measures. iii. CMS will establish benchmarks for each measure based on an analysis of the State’s quality performance, as further detailed in Section IV.J.3.b.v.1 below. iv. The Demonstration Measurement Set (including core measures revised from the MOU, State-specific process measures, and State-specific Demonstration measures) is as follows: All Cause Hospital Readmission (Plan All Cause Readmission #1768) Reporting Benchmark Benchmark Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Condition Hospital Admission (PQI Composite #90) Reporting Benchmark Benchmark ED Visits for Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇) Reporting Benchmark Benchmark Follow-Up after Hospitalization for Mental Illness (NQF #0576) Reporting Benchmark Benchmark Depression screening and follow-up care (#0418) Reporting Benchmark Care transition record transmitted to health care professional (NQF #648) Reporting Reporting Screening for fall risk (#0101) Reporting Initiation and engagement of alcohol and other drug dependent treatment: (a) initiation, (b) engagement (NQF #0004) Reporting Health Action Plans: Percentage of beneficiaries with Health Action Plans within 90 days of enrollment Reporting Benchmark Benchmark Training: Delivery of standardized state training for Health Home Care Coordinators on the Health Action Plan Reporting Benchmark Benchmark Discharge Follow-up: Percentage of beneficiaries with 30 days between hospital discharge to first follow-up visit Reporting Reporting Benchmark State-Specific Demonstration Measures Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Average change in Patient Activation Measure (▇▇▇) score for participating Medicare- Medicaid Enrollees who initially were least activated Reporting Benchmark Benchmark Percent of high-risk Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees receiving community-based LTCSS Reporting Benchmark Benchmark Percent of high-risk Medicare-Medicaid Enrollees receiving institutional long term care services Reporting Benchmark Benchmark v. Benchmarking and Scoring State Performance: Benchmarks for individual measures will be determined through an analysis...
Quality Metrics and Reporting for Determining the Retrospective Performance Payment. General Principles: Under this Demonstration, Washington will be eligible to receive a retrospective performance payment based on its performance on quality and savings criteria, as outlined in Appendix 6 and in this section. Approach: If the State meets the minimum quality threshold, it will receive 60% of the retrospective performance payment calculated in Appendix 6. Once the minimum quality threshold is met, the State may qualify to receive the remaining 40% of the retrospective performance payment, or some portion thereof, dependent upon State performance on the individual quality measures outlined in this Section. Measurement Groups: The Demonstration will consider quality for payment purposes in three grouping: Quality Threshold: State performance on individual measures will be scored

Related to Quality Metrics and Reporting for Determining the Retrospective Performance Payment

  • Performance Expectations The Charter School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the CPF shall provide the basis upon which the SCSC will decide whether to renew the Charter School’s Charter Contract at the end of the charter term. This section shall not preclude the SCSC from considering other relevant factors in making renewal decisions.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.

  • Quarterly Contractor Performance Reporting Customers shall complete a Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit I) for each Contractor on a Quarterly basis. Customers will electronically submit the completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) to the Department Contract Manager no later than the due date indicated in Contract Exhibit D, Section 17, Additional Special Contract Conditions. The completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) will be used by the Department as a performance-reporting tool to measure the performance of Contractors. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MyFloridaMarketPlace or on the Department's website).

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT The Contractor shall allow the Authorized User to assess Contractor’s performance by providing any materials requested in the Authorized User Agreement (e.g., page load times, response times, uptime, and fail over time). The Authorized User may perform this Contractor performance audit with a third party at its discretion, at the Authorized User’s expense. The Contractor shall perform an independent audit of its Data Centers, at least annually, at Contractor expense. The Contractor will provide a data owner facing audit report upon request by the Authorized User. The Contractor shall identify any confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information in accordance with Appendix B, Section 9(a), Confidential/Trade Secret Materials.

  • Performance while Dispute is Pending Notwithstanding the existence of a dispute, the Supplier must continue without delay to carry out all of its responsibilities under the Contract that are not affected by the dispute. If the Supplier fails to continue without delay to perform its responsibilities under the Contract, in the accomplishment of all undisputed work, the Supplier will bear any additional costs incurred by Sourcewell and/or its Participating Entities as a result of such failure to proceed.