QUALITY PROBLEMS Sample Clauses

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
QUALITY PROBLEMS. In the event of a quality problem, access to batch and production data has to be possible within three business days. If the problems are due to the quality of the products, contractual partners are obligated to work out approaches to solutions within one business day after the problem has occurred. Supplier has to ensure that short-term access to resources for fault analysis is possible at any time. The procedure for the handling of complaints is stipulated as follows: - 2 working days at the latest after receipt of <information/parts> (or pictures, defect samples, respectively), acknowledgement of receipt has to be sent to juwi (3D). - 15 working days at the latest after receipt of <information/parts> (if needed for a primary response), primary response has to be sent to juwi. Contents of primary response: 8D-report including section „Immediate Measures“ (5D). - 30 working days at the latest after juwi issued the complaint, a complete 8D-report has to be submitted. If this is not possible, Supplier has to report this together with a detailed interim report. This interim report also has to state when the complete 8D-report (or the next interim report, respectively) will be submitted. The period between two interim reports must not exceed 14 calendar days. This period of time (of 14 calendar days for submitting the complete 8D- report) may only be prolonged on the basis of detailed interim reports Final fault analysis reports have to be meaningful, coherent and complete with regard to contents. The reporting format has to be that of the 8D-report.
View Source
QUALITY PROBLEMS. Licensee and Grant shall cooperate to resolve problems Licensee or its Sub-Licensees may have in complying with Atlas Bradford Connection standards and specifications of quality. In the event Atlas Bradford Connections that are Threaded or Reconstructed by Licensee or its Sub-Licensees utilizing the licenses from Grant fail to comply with Grant standards and specifications of quality, then Licensee and its Sub-Licensees, as the case may be, shall refrain from marketing or selling such non-conforming Atlas Bradford Connections until such time as the problems causing such non conformance are solved.
View SourceView Similar (3)
QUALITY PROBLEMS. 1. In case of deviations from the product- or the performance specification (drawing, technical terms of delivery, material, material properties, etc.) or from released procedures, the Sup- plier shall obtain a written deviation permit from GAUDLITZ before delivering the products. Potential arising expenditures which result from granting the deviation permit shall be at the Supplier’s expense. 2. If the Supplier or his subcontractor detects an increase in deviations of the actual condition of the Products from their specified condition (quality fall-offs), he shall, without delay (with- in 24 hours), inform the Ordering Party thereof and about the remedial action he intends to take. Until those corrective actions will take effect, the Ordering Party is able to demand special measures (e.g. higher testing frequency) for an appropriate period. It shall be for the Sup- plier to prove the restored accuracy of the contractual products and the achievement of the arranged quality level. Hereby arising additional costs are at the Supplier’s expense, pro- vided that the quality fall-off was not verifiably caused by the Ordering Party. 3. The Supplier shall, by marking the packing (traceability) or, if this should be impossible or inappropriate, by other suitable measures, take care to ensure that, as soon as any non- conformity of any of the Products occurs, he can identify which further Products might be affected. The Supplier shall inform the Ordering Party about his marking system or other measures, so as to enable the Ordering Party to carry out its own investigations to the ex- tent necessary. In the event of a quality problem, there shall be the possibility of access to lot and produc- tion data within one working day. Insofar as the problems issue from the quality of the products, the contracting parties are obliged to elaborate on approaches within one working day after appearance of the problem. The Supplier shall ensure that a short-term access to resources for inspecting and analyzing defects will be guaranteed at any time. 4. In the event of complaints, GAUDLITZ shall ask the Supplier for the presentation of an 8D report. The deadlines set therein, shall be considered by the Supplier. If it is not possible for the Supplier to meet the set deadlines, thus he shall communicate this in combination with a well-founded interim report. Final reports of error analyses shall to be meaningful, conclu- sive and complete with regard to contents. 5. For every justi...
View SourceView Similar (2)
QUALITY PROBLEMS. In the event of product non-conformity, it must be possible to trace back production so that the affected batches of products can be isolated. The customer will provide the Supplier with the necessary data for tracing back. In so far as the problems relate to product quality, it is the Supplier’s duty to develop solutions once a complaint has been made. The Supplier shall ensure that it has rapid access at all times to the necessary resources for the investigation and analysis of defects. The procedure for the management of complaints is to be standardised as follows (the Supplier will be notified by LEONI of the detailed particulars required for this in the relevant test report): ▪ An initial response must be sent to LEONI at the latest on the next working day (for the Supplier) following receipt of the information/test report (where this is necessary for an in- itial response). Content of the initial response: 8D report including an “Immediate Measures” section. ▪ At the latest 10 working days after the issuing of the complaint by LEONI, LEONI is to be furnished with a comprehensive 8D report. Should it not be possible for the Supplier to submit a comprehensive 8D report within this timeframe, the Supplier must notify LEONI of this fact, accompanying its notification with a well-founded interim report. This interim report must name a date previously agreed upon with Leoni by which the comprehensive 8D report (or next interim report) will be submitted. ▪ These deadlines may be reduced by a reasonable period of time at the request of LEONI or the customer in question. The deadline of 10 days (for submission of the comprehensive 8D report) may only be extended on the basis of well-founded interim reports being submitted. However, this will be at the discre- tion of LEONI or a particular client of LEONI. Final defect analysis reports must be to the point, conclusive and comprehensive. The Supplier is required to provide proof of effectiveness of all the necessary measures. The reporting format to be used is that of the 8D report. If the Supplier is unable to restore the agreed level of quality within the mutually agreed timeframe, LEONI will be entitled to demand that the Supplier seek help from an external service provider at the Supplier’s expense.
View SourceView Similar (2)
QUALITY PROBLEMS. Should Stereotaxis identify a quality issue or problem on a component or subassembly and request Supplier to implement containment action on the part failure, Supplier shall, within 3 business days after receipt of Stereotaxis' request, deliver to Stereotaxis a documented containment plan. Stereotaxis will review the proposed plan and will promptly notify Supplier of acceptance or revisions to the plan. Upon acceptance of the containment plan Supplier shall commence implementation of plan and diligently proceed with implementation of plan to completion. Supplier will substantiate this containment plan with a closed loop corrective action identifying a permanent fix. Additionally, Supplier will implement a preventative action plan, as necessary, to prevent the occurrence of a quality issue or problem on a component or subassembly.
View Source
QUALITY PROBLEMS. (a) Without prejudice to Distributor taking the necessary and reasonable steps to minimise damage to the public or its consumers, within 2 days of arrival of the Products at the Delivery Point, Distributor must inspect the Products and reject any Products that have visibly apparent Material Quality Problems by providing Supplier with written notice (Material Quality Problems Notice) of its rejection including written evidence (to the satisfaction of Supplier) of the Material Quality Problems.‌ (b) On receipt of the Material Quality Problems Notice, Supplier must review the notice and notify Distributor in writing whether it accepts or rejects the notice and, if rejected, provide written reasons for its rejection. (c) If Supplier accepts the Material Quality Problems Notice, or it is determined through dispute resolution that the Products have Material Quality Problems, then Supplier will, at Supplier’s election: (i) supply replacement Products that satisfy the Specifications and that are free of any Material Quality Problems as soon as practicable; or (ii) refund all payments made by Distributor for the Products that are determined to have Material Quality Problems. (d) If Supplier rejects the Material Quality Problems Notice, then the parties will resolve any dispute in relation to any Material Quality Problems in accordance with the dispute resolution process set out in clause 23. (e) If Distributor does not provide a Material Quality Problems Notice within the timeframe specified in clause 14.2(a), then the Products will be deemed to have been accepted by Distributor and the Products will be deemed not to have any Material Quality Problems. (f) Distributor must comply with any reasonable requests and directions from Supplier in relation to the return or disposal of Products that are determined to have Material Quality Problems.
View Source
QUALITY PROBLEMS. If a quality problem occurs, then the batch and production data must be accessible within one calendar day. If the problem occurred due to the product quality, the contracting parties are required to work out an approach to solve the problem within one working day after the problem has occurred. The supplier must ensure that rapid access to resources for defect examination and defect analysis is always possible. The procedure for processing complaints was agreed to and defined as follows: - No later than 1 calendar day after receiving the complaint (or photographs, defective samples), confirmation of receipt must be sent to E+E Elektronik. - No later than 2 calendar days after receiving the returned parts (if necessary for the initial response), an initial response must be sent to E+E Elektronik. Content of the initial response: 8D report, filled out up to and including the point “Immediate measures”. - No later than 14 calendar days after the complaint is issued by E+E Elektronik, a completed 8D report must be received by them. If the Supplier is not able to supply a complete 8D report within this deadline, he must report this to E+E Elektronik by a detailed interim report. This interim report must specify a deadline for submission of the complete 8D report (or for the next interim report). The time between two interim reports may not exceed 14 calendar days. The deadline (of 14 calendar days for submission of the completed 8D report) can only be extended by submitting detailed and clear interim reports. Final defect analysis reports must include specific, plausible and complete information. The 8D report is the default method for reporting. If the Supplier is not able to reach the agreed quality level within the agreed deadline, E+E Elektronik can require the support of an external consultant at the expense of the supplier.
View Source
QUALITY PROBLEMS. Tenaris shall cooperate to resolve problems Licensee may have in complying with Tenaris Premium Connection standards and specifications of quality. In the event Tenaris Premium Connections that are Threaded or Reconstructed by Licensee fail to comply with the Tenaris Premium Connections standards and specifications of quality, then Licensee shall refrain from marketing or selling such non-conforming Tenaris Premium Connections until such time as the problems causing such non conformance are solved. In the event that Licensee fails to resolve such problems within a reasonable time after discovery of the defect, or after the time it should have discovered the defect, Tenaris may terminate this Agreement by means of a written notice to Licensee.
View Source

Related to QUALITY PROBLEMS

  • Problems To endeavour to resolve in a fair and just manner any problems, grievances or difficulties which may be encountered while you volunteer with us;

  • Problem Solving Employees and supervisors are encouraged to attempt to resolve on an informal basis, at the earliest opportunity, a problem that could lead to a grievance. If the matter is not resolved by informal discussion, or a problem-solving meeting does not occur, it may be settled in accordance with the grievance procedure. Unless mutually agreed between the Employer and the Union problem-solving discussions shall not extend the deadlines for filing a grievance. The Union ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ or in their absence, the Local Union President, or Area ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, or Chief ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, either with the employee or alone, shall present to the appropriate supervisor a written request for a meeting. If the supervisor agrees to a problem- solving meeting, this meeting shall be held within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the request. The supervisor, employee, Union ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and up to one (1) other management person shall attempt to resolve the problem through direct and forthright communication. If another member of management is present that person will not be hearing the grievance at Step Two, should it progress to that Step. The employee, the Union ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ or in their absence, the Local Union President, or Area ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, or Chief ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, may participate in problem-solving activities on paid time, in accordance with Article 31, Union Rights, Section 1H.

  • Required Procurement Procedures for Obtaining Goods and Services The Grantee shall provide maximum open competition when procuring goods and services related to the grant- assisted project in accordance with Section 287.057, Florida Statutes.

  • Product Complaints Subdistributor shall promptly notify Distributor of (but in no event later than 24 hours after receipt), and provide, upon Distributor’s request, reasonable assistance to address and investigate, any complaint or adverse claim about any Product or its use of which Subdistributor becomes aware;

  • Quality Improvement The Parties must develop QI activities specifically for the oversight of the requirements of this MOU, including, without limitation, any applicable performance measures and QI initiatives, including those to prevent duplication of services, as well as reports that track referrals, Member engagement, and service utilization. Such QI activities must include processes to monitor the extent to which Members are able to access mental health services across SMHS and NSMHS, and Covered Service utilization. The Parties must document these QI activities in policies and procedures.