Response to Recommendations Clause Samples

Response to Recommendations. The Employer shall provide, within thirty (30) days, a written response to the recommendations of the safety committee which indicates acceptance or rejection of the recommendations and the reasons therefore. An extension of thirty (30) days is permitted upon written notification to the Safety Committee. Unresolved issues shall be submitted to the Labor Management Committee for resolution according to a majority vote of its members. If the LMC is evenly split on an issue, the Association retains the right to submit the matter to arbitration under Article XIV, Section 14.5.
View SourceView Similar (51)
Response to Recommendations. The Employer shall provide, within thirty (30) days, a written response to the recommendations of the safety committee which indicates acceptance or rejection of the recommendations and the reasons therefore. An extension of thirty (30) days is permitted upon written notification to the Safety Committee. Unresolved issues shall be submitted to the Labor Management Committee for resolution according to a majority vote of its members. If the LMC is evenly split on an issue, the Union retains the right to submit the matter to arbitration under Article XIII, Section 13.5. 12.12. The Employer will make every reasonable effort to insure that the employee parking areas are properly plowed and/or treated prior to 7:30 a.m., in cases of inclement weather.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Response to Recommendations. A constructor or employer who receives written recommendations from a committee shall respond in writing within twenty-one days.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Response to Recommendations. The Employer shall provide, within thirty (30) days, a written response to the recommendations of the safety committee which indicates acceptance or
View SourceView Similar (2)
Response to Recommendations. Response R# [Retype the text of the recommendation as written in the Grand Jury report, # is the recommendation number in the report.]
View Source
Response to Recommendations. Recommendation 2-1 (to Acting Assistant Administrator for OARM): OARM Response: AA Responses: Recommendation 2-2 (to Acting Assistant Administrator for OARM):
View Source
Response to Recommendations. 12.3.12.1 The content of a performance evaluation shall not be subject to Article 13,
View Source
Response to Recommendations. Upon delivery of the Policy Neutrals’ Report, including their Recommendations, the Parties will meet and confer for up to 75 days to determine which Recommendations the District will adopt and the timeframe for adopting such Recommendations. The Parties agree that the recommendations offered by the Policy Neutrals for implementation by the District will be entitled to substantial weight in such discussions. If the Parties are unable to reach agreement regarding the adoption of any particular Recommendation(s) during the meet and confer period, the Parties will pursue the matter through the Dispute Resolution process set out in § VI through steps 1 and 2 for any recommendation on which the Parties do not reach agreement and through step 3 for any issue on which the Parties do not reach agreement that is based on a legal obligation.
View Source

Related to Response to Recommendations

  • Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our country-by-country analysis, 197 of the AEWA populations are already well-monitored both for population size and trend. Our prioritisation method allowed focusing on the AEWA conservation and management priorities (Priorities 1-2) and to consider cost effectiveness and feasibility (Priorities 3-6). Theoretically, the two- third target of the AEWA Strategic Plan can be just attained by focusing on the development of monitoring activities for Priority 1-5 populations (i.e. leaving out the 168 more widespread Priority 6 populations that would require more species-specific monitoring methods. Most of the Priority 1-5 populations would require improvement of the IWC though regional schemes focusing on the West Asian / East African flyway with possibly three subregional components in the Central Asia, Arabia and Eastern and Southern Africa. In the latter region, improvements in Tanzania and Mozambique are particularly important. In the Black Sea - Mediterranean - Sahelian flyway the focus should be primarily on the Sahel countries and especially on increasing the consistency of annual counts. The quality of monitoring is already better in the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. In the East Atlantic, the ongoing capacity-building activities should continue and the consistency and representativity of site coverage should be further strengthened in most countries. Angola would require a major capacity improvement but primarily for the intra-African migrants on inland wetlands. It is also clear that the targets of the AEWA Strategic Plan cannot be achieved without complementing the IWC with periodic aerial surveys both in Western Africa as well as in Eastern and Southern Africa, by setting up a periodic offshore waterbird monitoring scheme in the Caspian Sea and by focusing in each country on a relatively small number of breeding bird species strategically selected in this report.