Responsible Conduct of Research Clause Samples

The Responsible Conduct of Research clause establishes expectations for ethical and professional behavior in the planning, execution, and reporting of research activities. It typically requires all parties involved in research to adhere to established standards regarding honesty, integrity, and compliance with applicable laws and institutional policies. This clause helps ensure that research is conducted transparently and ethically, thereby maintaining the credibility of results and protecting the interests of participants and stakeholders.
Responsible Conduct of Research. In accordance with Section 7009 of the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science (COMPETES) Act (42 USC 1862o–1) NSF requires that awardees must have a plan in place to provide appropriate training and oversight in the responsible and ethical conduct of research (RCR) to undergraduates, graduate students and postdoctoral researchers who will be supported by NSF to conduct research. Training plans are subject to review, upon request. Awardees must designate one or more persons to oversee compliance with the RCR training requirement. Awardees are responsible for verifying that undergraduate students, graduate students and postdoctoral researchers supported by NSF to conduct research have received training in the responsible and ethical conduct of research, in accordance with the plan the awardee has put in place for their organization. Awardees shall ensure that these RCR requirements flow down to all subrecipients, or are otherwise appropriately addressed in the subaward.
Responsible Conduct of Research applies to new proposals submitted or due on or after January 4, 2010.
Responsible Conduct of Research. In accordance with Section 7009 of the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science (COMPETES) Act (42 U.S.C. 1862o–1) NRAO requires that Subrecipient must have a plan in place to provide appropriate training and over sight in the responsible and ethical conduct of research (RCR) to undergraduates, graduate students, and postdoctoral researchers who will be supported by NRAO to conduct research. Training plans are subject to review, upon request. Subrecipient must designate one or more persons to oversee compliance with the RCR training requirement. Subrecipient is responsible for verifying that undergraduate students, graduate students, and postdoctoral researchers supported by NRAO to conduct research have received training in the responsible and ethical conduct of research, in accordance with the plan the Subrecipient has put in place for their organization. Subrecipient shall ensure that these RCR requirements flow down, or are otherwise appropriately addressed in the subaward instrument.
Responsible Conduct of Research. It is the PI’s responsibility to ensure that students complete RCR training if required by the granting agency. If IRB/IACUC approval is necessary, submit approval letter to OSP Ensure that IRB/IACUC approval remains valid through the full grant period. For grants that offer general research opportunities for students, it is important to alert the funder (NIH or NSF) if students choose to work on projects that require IRB/IACUC approval. Federal approval is required prior to commencing the research project. Any PI or co-PI on a federal grant through ▇▇▇▇▇▇ must meet with the Title IX officer to learn how to comply with NSF, NIH, and NOAA policy and guidance. In lieu of a signature, the NIH requires that ▇▇▇▇▇▇ secure and retain a written assurance from the PI or PD prior to submitting an application, a progress report, or a prior approval request. At the end of the period of performance, but no later than the closeout period, the PI must report on property using the property forms (SF-428/SF-429 forms) located at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/web/grants/forms/post-award-reporting-forms.html#sortby=1. Such property shall include real property, federally owned and exempt property, equipment acquired with grant funds, and residual inventory of unused supplies exceeding $5,000 in total aggregate value. Follow Property Management Standards and Procedures for federally funded equipment by labeling and tracking all equipment (>$5,000 value) purchased with grant funds. If the PI wants to dispose of grant-funded property with a value of >$5,000, property disposition instructions must be requested from the funder. Do not submit additional proposals to secure funding for the current project. Compliance with any applicable public access policy is required, including but not limited to publications resulting from research supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the National Science Foundation (NSF), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The NIH, NSF, and NOAA require that an electronic version of their final manuscript be made publically available in a designated repository within 12 months after the official date of publication; more details can be found on the NSF, NIH, and NOAA websites. Federal funding sources should be acknowledged in all publications related to the grant project, with the identification of the grant program and award number. It is the responsibility of the PI to comply with the College’s Policy on Intellectual Pro...
Responsible Conduct of Research. (a) The Recipient must ensure that research conducted by it and each Project Partner conforms to the principles outlined in the following and their successor documents: (i) the NHMRC/ARC/UA Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (2007); and (ii) if applicable, the NHMRC/ARC/AVCC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007). (b) The Recipient must ensure that it and each Project Partner: (i) promote the responsible conduct of research; (ii) maintain high standards of responsible research; (iii) report research responsibly; (iv) respect all research participants; (v) respect animals used in research; (vi) respect the environment; and (vii) report research misconduct. (c) The Recipient must have, and must ensure that each Project Partner has, procedures in place for dealing with instances of suspected or alleged research misconduct which are consistent with the principles referred to at clause 30.18(a). CRC-P Funding Agreement CRC-P53981 | Novogen Limited | March 2017 page 40 Schedule 1Agreement Details 1. Commonwealth 1.1 Commonwealth of Australia as represented by the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science Industry House ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ABN 74 599 608 295 2. Recipient 1.1 Novogen Ltd PO Box ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ABN 37 063 259 754 3. Commonwealth Representative 1.1 and 11.1 General Manager, Single Business Service Programme and CRC Programme 4. Recipient Representative 1.1 and 11.1 Dr ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Program Director Novogen Ltd 5. Project Partners 1.1 I C P – Firefly Pty Limited SME industry participant Address: PO Box 6198 Alexandria, NSW 2015 ABN: 66 071 626 358 University of New South Wales (UNSW) School of Medical Sciences Research participant Address: Professor ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, School of Medical Sciences, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Building ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ABN: 57 195 873 179 6. Programme 1.1 The Cooperative Research Centres Programme (CRC Programme)
Responsible Conduct of Research. In relation to Research conducted on the Premises, the Parties and the Research Staff will comply with the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research 2018 (NHMRC, 2018) or its replacement. In cases of alleged research misconduct, each party will be obligated to investigate according to its own requirements and each Party will agree to collaborate and keep the other informed at each stage of the investigation. Where a case of research misconduct is identified through the initial investigation, the investigation file will be passed to Human Resources department of the employer of the Personnel under investigation. The responsible Party will complete the investigation and deal with any subsequent disciplinary action. Subject to law, any disciplinary action taken by one Party on a member of staff of the other Party, including disciplinary action that impacts on the staff member’s ability to undertake Research will be formally notified to the other Party.
Responsible Conduct of Research. The Institution shall comply with the requirements set out in the Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research, as amended, which sets out the responsibilities of Institutions, Researchers and the Agencies in respect of the responsible conduct of research, including the procedures to be followed in the event of a breach of an Agency requirement, or an allegation thereof.
Responsible Conduct of Research. In accordance with Section 7009 of the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education and Science (COMPETES) Act (42 U.S.C. 1862o-1) University agrees to provide appropriate training and oversight in the responsible and ethical conduct of research (RCR) to undergraduates, graduate students, and postdoctoral research.

Related to Responsible Conduct of Research

  • Responsible Contractor A responsible Contractor is a Contractor who has demonstrated the attribute of trustworthiness, as well as quality, fitness, capacity and experience to satisfactorily perform the contract. It is the County’s policy to conduct business only with responsible Contractors.

  • Non-responsible Contractor The County may debar a Contractor if the Board of Supervisors finds, in its discretion, that the Contractor has done any of the following: (1) violated a term of a contract with the County or a nonprofit corporation created by the County, (2) committed an act or omission which negatively reflects on the Contractor’s quality, fitness or capacity to perform a contract with the County, any other public entity, or a nonprofit corporation created by the County, or engaged in a pattern or practice which negatively reflects on same, (3) committed an act or offense which indicates a lack of business integrity or business honesty, or (4) made or submitted a false claim against the County or any other public entity.

  • Regulation AB Compliance; Intent of Parties; Reasonableness The parties hereto acknowledge that interpretations of the requirements of Regulation AB may change over time, whether due to interpretive guidance provided by the Commission or its staff, consensus among participants in the asset-backed securities markets, advice of counsel, or otherwise, and agree to comply with requests made by the Depositor or the Master Servicer in good faith for delivery of information under these provisions on the basis of evolving interpretations of Regulation AB. In connection with the Trust, the Servicer shall cooperate fully with the Master Servicer and the Depositor to deliver to the Master Servicer and/or the Depositor (including its assignees or designees), any and all statements, reports, certifications, records and any other information available to such party and reasonably necessary in the good faith determination of the Depositor or the Master Servicer to permit the Depositor to comply with the provisions of Regulation AB, together with such disclosures relating to the Servicer reasonably believed by the Depositor or the Master Servicer to be necessary in order to effect such compliance.

  • Existence; Conduct of Business The Borrower will, and will cause each of its Subsidiaries to, do or cause to be done all things necessary to preserve, renew and keep in full force and effect its legal existence and the rights, licenses, permits, privileges and franchises material to the conduct of its business; provided that the foregoing shall not prohibit any merger, consolidation, liquidation or dissolution permitted under Section 6.03.

  • Indemnification Related to Confidentiality of Materials The Contractor will protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Department for claims, costs, fines, and attorney’s fees arising from or relating to its designation of materials as trade secret or otherwise confidential.