Result 2 Clause Samples

Result 2. A. Assistance provided to at least 23,150 of out-of-schooled youth in 25-targeted municipalities or surrounding to return to formal schooling or to complete a lower secondary education diploma

Result 2. 2: AETR institutions providing outreach services and technical support to clients in farming communities and the private sector. 16

Result 2. Increased sustainable quality of service delivery across the PHCU’s continuum of care

Result 2. 2 Covid-19-relevant medical and pharmaceutical RVC

Result 2. Policy analysis

Result 2. If L is targeted, the maximum offer D is willing to offer H is xH ≡ (2H+d—w)(Fc(H+d+w)—Fc(d+w)) . If H is targeted, the maximum offer D is willing to offer L is x (2H+d)(Fc(H+d—w)—Fc(d)) . Fc(H+d—w)

Result 2. If L is targeted, the maximum offer D is willing to offer H is xH ≡ (2H+d−w)(Fc(H+d+w)−Fc(d+w)) . If H is targeted, the maximum offer D is willing to offer L is x (2H+d)(Fc(H+d−w)−Fc(d)) . Fc(H+d−w) Given the expected coalition decisions and minimal offers needed to induce such coali- tions, will the dictator initiate conflict? If so, which elite will he target? High conflict uncertainty benefits the target and mitigates the dictator’s power advantage. Even when a coalition member would increase his chance of victory, an uncertain conflict environment means that the increase in win probability is not large enough to counteract the decrease in benefits from the offered power transfer. The dictator prefers maintaining his power and avoiding risky conflict, therefore he chooses no target. If the dictator’s advantage is great enough relative to the conflict uncertainty, however, the dictator is willing to choose a target and make a positive offer of power sharing to the non-targeted elite. Under this level of uncertainty, both coalitions are available: the dictator could come to a power-sharing agree- ment with either H or L. Additionally, both of these target and coalition options are strictly preferred to no conflict. In choosing between targets and the resulting coalition, the dictator chooses to target L and make a sufficient coalition offer to H.

Result 2. Let σ and τ be any elements of 1. There exists a unique endomorphism h of 1 such that h(0, 1, 0) = σ and h(0, 0, 1) = τ .

Result 2. 1: AETR institutions promoting innovative research solutions to public/private clients‌ a) ERA Signature research program‌ For the implementation of its second component, USAID/ERA has begun the rollout of its competitive grant program with FNRAA to fund collaborative agricultural research projects. For this, a pilot collaboration between the two structures has been implemented for one year. The goal of this pilot program is to refine existing procedures for submission, selection, contracting, monitoring, and evaluation of research projects accepted for funding by SNRASP, FNRAA, and USAID/ERA (the National Steering Committee for Agro-Silvo- Pastoral Research, the National Fund for Agricultural and Agri-Food Research (FNRAA), and the Education and Research in Agriculture Project). These structures will be assisted throughout the process by the Management Entity of the USAID/ERA Project at Virginia Tech as well as by the other partner universities in the USAID/ERA consortium.  On February 1, 2012, the joint ERA/FNRAA pilot issued its first call for grant applications. The call for proposals was open to research teams having expertise in agriculture and agribusiness, for the spontaneous submission of research projects following a value chain approach to improve the productivity of three target local cereals: rice, millet and corn. This call for proposals was organized by FNRAA but funded by USAID/ERA. In total, twenty five applications were received and reviewed by members of the CST FNRAA and representatives from USAID/ERA.  A Training Workshop for Bidders on the development of research projects was held from March 5 to 9, 2012. The objectives of this workshop were to improve the quality of future research proposals and increase the number of projects funded under the call for proposals on 1 February 2012. The training was developed, implemented and facilitated by two expert consultants hired by FNRAA. This workshop was attended by 19 participants of diverse backgrounds representing the research establishment of the Senegalese agricultural sector.  Bidders’ Conference, March 22, 2012 in Dakar: USAID/ERA and FNRAA organized a joint meeting for project coordinators to enable them to have as much information as possible to optimize and improve their research proposals. Additionally, there was an effort to build strong partnerships between Senegalese, American, and foreign research institutions, as well as nongovernmental organizations, International Agricultur...