Review of Additional Items Clause Samples

Review of Additional Items. ‌ i. for each Additional Item reviewed, a description of the review conducted; ii. for each Additional Item reviewed, the IRO’s findings based on its review; iii. for each Additional Item reviewed, the findings and supporting rationale regarding any weaknesses in Taro’s systems, processes, policies, procedures, and practices relating to the Additional Item, if any; and iv. for each Additional Item reviewed, recommendations, if any, for changes in Taro’s systems, processes, policies, and procedures that would correct or address any weaknesses or deficiencies uncovered during the review. Appendix C‌
View SourceView Similar (2)
Review of Additional Items. As set forth in Section III.E.2.c of the CIA, for each Reporting Period, the OIG at its discretion may identify up to three additional items for the IRO to review (hereafter “Additional Items”). No later than 120 days prior to the end of the applicable Reporting Period, the OIG shall notify RMS of the nature and scope of the IRO review to be conducted for each of the Additional Items. Prior to undertaking the review of the Additional Items, the IRO and/or RMS shall submit an audit work plan to the OIG for approval and the IRO shall conduct the review of the Additional Items based on a work plan approved by the OIG. The IRO shall include information about its review of each Additional Item in the Transactions Review Report (including a description of the review conducted for each Additional Item; the IRO's findings based on its review for each Additional Item; and the IRO's recommendations for any changes in RMS's systems, processes, policies, and procedures based on its review of each Additional Item). a. RMS may propose to OIG that its internal audit(s), reviews, or monitoring activities, including those conducted as part of the Field Force Monitoring Program described in Section III. K and/or other reviews conducted by outside entities at RMS’s request be substituted, subject to the Verification Review requirements set forth below, for one or more of the Additional Items that would otherwise be reviewed by the IRO for the applicable Reporting Period. The OIG retains sole discretion over whether, and in what manner, to allow RMS’s internal audit work to be substituted for a portion of the Additional Items review conducted by the IRO.‌ b. In making its decision, the OIG agrees to consider, among other factors, the nature and scope of RMS’s planned internal audit work or compliance monitoring or audit activities, the results of the Transactions Review(s) during prior Reporting Period(s), and RMS’s demonstrated audit capabilities to perform the proposed audit work internally. If the OIG denies RMS’s request to permit its internal audit work or compliance‌ monitoring or audit activities to be substituted for a portion of the IRO’s review of Additional Items in a given Reporting Period, RMS shall engage the IRO to perform the Review as outlined in this Section III. E. c. If the OIG agrees to permit certain of RMS’s internal audit work or compliance monitoring or audit activities for a given Reporting Period to be substituted for a portion of Additional Items rev...
View Source
Review of Additional Items. As set forth in Section III.D of the CIA, for each Reporting Period, the OIG at its discretion may identify up to three additional items for the IRO to review (hereafter “Additional Items”). a. No later than 120 days prior to the end of the applicable Reporting Period, the OIG shall notify Biotronik of the nature and scope of the IRO review to be conducted for each of the Additional Items. Prior to undertaking the review of the Additional Items, the IRO and/or Biotronik shall submit an audit work plan to the OIG for approval and the IRO shall conduct the review of the Additional Items based on a work plan approved by the OIG. The IRO shall include information about its review of each Additional Item in the Transactions Review Report (including a description of the review conducted for each Additional Item; the IRO’s findings based on its review for each Additional Item; and the IRO’s recommendations for any changes in Biotronik’s systems, policies, and procedures based on its review of each Additional Item).‌ b. Biotronik may propose to the OIG that its internal audit(s), reviews, or monitoring activities, be substituted, subject to the Verification Review requirements set forth below, for one or more of the Additional Items that‌ would otherwise be reviewed by the IRO for the applicable Reporting Period. The OIG retains sole discretion over whether, and in what manner, to allow Biotronik’s internal audit work to be substituted for a portion of the Additional Items review conducted by the IRO.
View Source
Review of Additional Items. As set forth in Section III.D of the CIA, for each Reporting Period, OIG at its discretion may identify up to three additional items for the IRO to review (hereafter “Additional Items”). No later than 90 days prior to the end of the applicable Reporting Period, OIG shall notify Mylan of the nature and scope of the IRO review to be conducted for each of the Additional Items. Prior to undertaking the review of the Additional Items, the IRO and/or Mylan shall submit an audit work plan to OIG for approval and the IRO shall conduct the review of the Additional Items based on a work plan approved by OIG. The IRO shall include information about its review of each Additional Item in the Transactions Review Report (including a description of the review conducted for each Additional Item; the IRO’s findings based on its review for each Additional Item; and the IRO’s recommendations for any changes in Mylan’s systems, processes, policies, and procedures based on its review of each Additional Item).
View Source
Review of Additional Items. As set forth in Section III.E.2 of the CIA, for each Reporting Period, the OIG at its discretion may identify up to three additional items for the IRO to review (hereafter “Additional Items”). No later than 90 days prior to the end of the applicable Reporting Period, the OIG shall notify ACell of the nature and scope of the IRO review to be conducted for each of the Additional Items. Prior to undertaking the review of the Additional Items, the IRO and/or ACell shall submit an audit work plan to the OIG for approval and the IRO shall conduct the review of the Additional Items based on a work plan approved by the OIG. If an Additional Items Review is required for a Reporting Period, the IRO shall include information about its review of each Additional Item in the Transactions Review Report as outlined below.‌
View Source

Related to Review of Additional Items

  • Payment of Additional Costs If termination of this contract is due to the failure of the Engineer to fulfill its contract obligations, the State may take over the project and prosecute the work to completion, and the Engineer shall be liable to the State for any additional cost to the State.

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • CLAIMS FOR ADDITIONAL COST 12.3.1 If the Contractor wishes to make a claim for an increase in the Contract Sum, he shall give the Architect written notice thereof within twenty days after the occurrence of the event giving rise to such claim. This notice shall be given by the Contractor before proceeding to execute the Work, except in an emergency endangering life or property in which case the Contractor shall proceed in accordance with Paragraph 10.3 of these General Conditions. No such claim shall be valid unless so made. If the State and the Contractor cannot agree on the amount of the adjustment in the Contract Sum, it shall be determined by the Architect. Any change in the Contract Sum resulting from such claim shall be authorized by Change Order. 12.3.2 If the Contractor claims that additional cost is involved because of, but not limited to, (1) any order by the State to stop the Work pursuant to Paragraph 3.3 of these General Conditions where the Contractor was not at fault, or (2) failure of payment by the State pursuant to Paragraph 9.7(of these General Conditions), the Contractor shall make such claim as provided in Subparagraph 12.3.1 of this agreement. 12.3.3 The Architect will have authority to order minor changes in the Work not involving an adjustment in the Contract Sum or an extension of the Contract Time and not inconsistent with the intent of the Contract Documents. Such changes shall be effected by written order and shall be binding on the State and Contractor within 10 days unless the Contractor or the State objects to the change in writing.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Designation of Additional Accounts The Seller hereby delivers herewith a computer file or microfiche or written list containing a true and complete list of all such Additional Accounts specifying for each such Account, as of the Additional Cut-Off Date, its account number, the aggregate amount of Receivables outstanding in such Account and the aggregate amount of Principal Receivables in such Account. Such file or list shall, as of the date of this Assignment, supplement Schedule 1 to the Agreement.