Scientific approach Sample Clauses

The 'Scientific approach' clause establishes that the parties involved will base their actions, decisions, or evaluations on established scientific methods and principles. In practice, this means that any processes, analyses, or problem-solving activities under the agreement must adhere to recognized scientific standards, such as using empirical data, peer-reviewed research, or validated methodologies. This clause ensures that outcomes are objective, reliable, and free from arbitrary or unsubstantiated practices, thereby promoting credibility and consistency in the execution of the agreement.
Scientific approach. Not to exceed 3 pages, the Offeror shall develop an outline for their approach to addressing the anticipated work stated above and in the scope of work. The Offeror may only propose additional geographic and environmental variables to consider, not mentioned in the RSOI, but pertinent to the study issues. The Offeror shall be evaluated as to the soundness of the overall approach and use of any innovative techniques to accomplish project objectives.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Scientific approach. Feasibility of the scientific approach described. - If the research methodology proposed is appropriate to achieve the project’s objectives. - If the proposal involves the creation of a new methodology. - If time and resources of the proposal are properly justified. It will be positively valued that the candidate has, at the time of the interview, an endorsement from some Vall d’Hebron University Hospital Clinical Service.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Scientific approach. Please describe the scientific approach of the project. Stream 1 Technology: For LEC tool kit development, progressing static and dynamic grid date, real-time data from the field, user preferences, forecasts, etc. are collected, developed and processed. New algorithms for a smart and efficient management of the integrated energy systems will be developed (e.g., based on artificial intelligence). By performance data analysis within and between the demo sites, the flexibility potential of different components will be analyzed.
View Source
Scientific approach. The relation between science and society works both ways: show society how science works and show scientists how society works. • There are a lot of topics that are being researched in the scientific world that are extremely relevant to society because of their ethical and social impacts. So, there should be a collective research with all the questions that people can make. • Opening your research can bring important benefits: sometimes, the research questions of citizens are much more interesting than the ones from the scientists; their participation can enhance communication, increase impact and more contrasted experiments. • Innovation requires time and resources, so any project focusing on funding pressure will be efficient but likely not innovative. • How to make science accessible: o Design the process in a way that is fun and friendly but also accurate and without oversimplifications. o Bring researchers and experts to talk about science but also to show how science is done. Promote science inquiry. o Read on a regular basis literature in Science Education, Science & technology studies and Science Communication. o Language matters. It is good to hire communication experts that get inputs from science experts and write the texts for the public. o The role of facilitator is essential, who must understand the audience through a process of co-creation. o In every workshop there should be one expert on the topic treated: deep knowledge of the topic provides opportunities for conversation and discussion. o It is a good practice to enable different-points of entry into an activity (that means for people who do not know anything, something or a lot). Collaboration between citizens with different levels of knowledge about a topic usually works very well. o Technology can play a role in making science accessible. Design platforms for citizens can break barriers. Accessibility and inclusivity must be carefully considered in every technological design.
View Source
Scientific approach. 2.1. To what extent is the scientific approach described feasible? 2.2. To what extent is the research methodology proposed appropriate to achieve the project’s objectives? 2.3. To what extent does the proposal involve the creation of a new methodology? 2.4. To what extent are time and resources of the proposal properly justified? The VHIR’s ad-hoc Search Committee will evaluate the scientific track record. ANEP will evaluate the research project on a qualitative basis.
View Source

Related to Scientific approach

  • Strategy As an organization without operational services (fuel, maintenance, etc.), and in consideration that the majority of potential issues come from boat maintenance whereby the boats are personal property, the predominant strategy will be the minimization of on-site waste. With this approach, the organization will have minimal potential impact on the environment and reduce regulatory risk. To accomplish this, requirements will be established by policy, periodic communications shall occur, and audits will be utilized to provide feedback for improvement.

  • Curriculum Development This includes the analysis and coordination of textual materials; constant review of current literature in the field, some of which are selected for the college library collection, the preparation of selective, descriptive materials such as outlines and syllabi; conferring with other faculty and administration on curricular problems; and, the attendance and participation in inter and intra-college conferences and advisory committees.

  • Training Programs All employees shall successfully complete all necessary training prior to being assigned work (e.g., all employees will complete health and safety training prior to being assigned to task). Nothing in this Article or provision shall constitute a waiver of either party’s bargaining obligations or defenses. The Employer still has an obligation to notify and bargain changes in terms and conditions of employment with the exclusive representative.

  • Training Program It is agreed that there shall be an Apprenticeship Training Program, the provisions of which are set forth in Exhibit "D", which is attached hereto and forms part of this Agreement.

  • Approach All investments are to be made using the value approach by investing in companies at prices below their underlying long term values to protect capital from loss and earn income over time and provide operating income as needed. With regard to equities, no attempt is made to forecast the economy or the stock market. The manager will attempt to identify financially sound companies with good potential profitability which are selling at large discounts to their intrinsic value. Appropriate measures of low prices may consist of some or all of the following characteristics: low price earnings ratios, high dividend yields, significant discounts to book value, and free cash flow. Downside protection is obtained by seeking a margin of safety in terms of a sound financial position and a low price in relation to intrinsic value. Appropriate measures of financial integrity which are regularly monitored, include debt/equity ratios, financial leverage, asset turnover, profit margin, return on equity, and interest coverage. As a result of this bargain hunting approach, it is anticipated that purchases will be made when economic and issue-specific conditions are less than ideal and sentiment is uncertain or negative. Conversely, it is expected that gains will be realized when issue-specific factors are positive and sentiment is buoyant. The investment time horizon is one business cycle (approximately 3-5 years). As regards bonds, the approach is similar. No attempt is made to forecast the economy or interest rates. The manager will attempt to purchase attractively priced bonds offering yields better than Treasury bonds with maturities of 10 years or less that are of sound quality i.e. whose obligations are expected to be fully met as they come due. We do not regard rating services as being an unimpeachable source for assessing credit quality any more than we would regard a broker's recommendation on a stock as being necessarily correct. In any form of investment research and evaluation, there is no substitute for the reasoned judgement of the investment committee and its managers.