Workflow Sample Clauses

Workflow. The just opened Cases will be immediately notified to a reference person for each Infrastructure: they will analyse it and, based on its description, will assign it to the most suitable responsible for follow up (stepping the item in “In Progress” status, asking for Feedback if something unclear or moving to resolved if a solution has been identified meanwhile). The Case will follow the workflow described in Figure 13: Process for tracking issues (only the Infrastructure Owners can directly Reject or Close the issue):

Workflow the documented process stages and requirements that describe the work that is carried out to progress the process from stage to stage;

Workflow. Signatories share the goal of ensuring uninterrupted and seamless service delivery, and adopt the following processes to accomplish that goal: [Describe here.]

Workflow. Automatic positioning system Couch integrated Typical repositioning time < 3 s Typical collimator size setup time < 3 s Blocked collimation setup time < 3 s Mixed collimation setup time (Composite shot) < 3 s Check and verify 100% QA procedure Automatic Accuracy Radiological accuracy < 0.5 mm Positioning repeatability < 0.05 mm Maximum patient weight 210 kg (460 pounds) Treatment planning Treatment planning system PC/Linux based Dynamic shaping Yes Remote planning Yes Image co-registration Yes PET supported Yes Mechanical treatment range X/Y/Z 160/180/220 mm Shape of accessible volume Cylindrical Real collimator sizes 4,8,16 mm diameter Radiation data Total cobalt-60 activity at loading (approx.) < 6,600 ▇▇▇▇▇ (2.44 x 1014 Bq) Number of radiation sources 192 Radiation dose rate at focal point at loading > 3 Gy/min Physical data Overall length, including cover 4.46 m Overall width, including cover 2.12 m Overall height, including cover 1.91 m Total weight (approximate) 20,000 kg The radiation unit is the radiation delivery system. It houses 192 Cobalt-60 sources and the collimator system that directs the radiation to the focus point. The radiation unit incorporates the management of the shielding doors and electro-mechanics of the source sectors. The following section describes selected components within the radiation unit. All components are chosen from well-recognized suppliers to secure reliability and to optimize performance of the system. Collimator body Tungsten body with 576 collimator channels. Collimators Tungsten collimator inserts. Pre-collimator 576 lead pre-collimator channels. Outer shielding Cast iron. Inner shielding Tungsten and lead. Bearing for collimator body Crossed roller bearing. Static axial load 680000 N Shielding doors Steel. Shielding strips Stainless Steel. Servo Controller High precision, fully digital servo drive with embedded intelligence. Motor DC motor with 2000 line encoder Linear guide Linear guide blocks Caged ball technology. Gear Planetary gear Clutch Ratchetting clutch 8 source carrying sector units Sector Aluminum. 24 source housing Shafts Induction hardened stainless steel. Bearings Graphite bushings Motor 24V DC motor Encoder 500 impulses/turn Linear guide unit Repeatability: ±0.003mm. Linear encoder Absolute Linear encoder. Solenoid Photo-micro sensor. Servo controllers Intelligent servo card

Workflow. Ethics/Legal /Regulatory e. Privacy and Security f. Patient engagement g. Behavioral Health h. Other (please specify – free response)

Workflow. Workflow Nov 2, 2021 4:54 PM :: Submitted by ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Routed to ▇▇▇▇▇ St ▇▇▇ for approval. Nov 2, 2021 4:57 PM :: Final approval by ▇▇▇▇▇ St ▇▇▇ Last Modified by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ on November 4, 2021 NAME PRESENT SCHOOL/DEPARTMENT PRESENT JOB CLASSIFICATION HOME PHONE WORK PHONE DATE OF EMPLOYMENT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER I hereby request to be interviewed for the following ADVERTISED VACANCY: WORK LOCATION PREFERENCE JOB CLASSIFICATION This request shall serve as an application for the advertised vacancy. Please return to the Human Resources Department, C/O Classified Section, School District Administration Office at ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ by 3:30 p.m. on the advertised deadline date. This request is to be used by PERMANENT EDUCATIONAL STAFF PROFESSIONALS ONLY. EMPLOYEE SIGNATURE DATE DATE: I, the undersigned supervisor, do request that a counseling session be held with the undersigned employee on (date, time, place). Subject: 1.

Workflow. Open Access publishing of Eligible Articles (Hybrid) a) Upon an Eligible Article (Hybrid) being confirmed by the Licensee as detailed in 1(c) above, all authors will be contacted via email by the Licensor to inform them of the corresponding author’s right to publish the Eligible Article (Hybrid) as Open Access with no direct cost. b) Transacting author (who can be any of the Article authors, including the Eligible Corresponding Author) enters the Licensor’s open access portal and confirms acceptance of Open Access publishing for the Eligible Article (Hybrid). c) Transacting author confirms the corresponding author’s identity and the copyright ownership status of the Eligible Article (Hybrid). d) Transacting author selects the appropriate CC-BY license under which their Eligible Article (Hybrid) will be published. By default, the transacting author will be offered the CC BY 4.0 license. The Licensor’s open access portal will provide explanatory text alerting author to why license is displayed. Author may contact The Licensor OA customer service if another license is required. Authors retain copyright to their article. e) Transacting author digitally signs the Open Access license. f) If the Transacting author rejects Open Access publishing of the Eligible Article, the Eligible Article will be published in a traditional subscription only format, not as Open Access. g) If a transacting author does not respond to the Licensor offer of Open Access publishing, a reminder will be sent by the Licensor to all authors after 7 days. h) If the Transacting Author does not digitally sign the Open Access license (e – above) within 14 days, the Eligible Article will be published in a traditional subscription only format, not as Open Access. i) Eligible Corresponding Authors who have rejected Open Access publication of their Eligible Article (Hybrid), who have not signed the Open Access license after 14 days, or have chosen a license other than CC BY4.0 (or later version) for their Accepted Article may contact the Licensor’s open access customer service team to request the offer be resent at any time before article proofs have been issued. In addition the Licensor will share a list of these articles, twice per year (by the end of March and the end of September, or by other mutually agreed dates), with the National Library, before re-sending the offer to the Eligible Corresponding Author(s). Any Author of the Article may respond to that offer within 14 days to accept Open Ac...

Workflow. After purchase is made, from their main panel, on the ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ platform, if Client wishes, the Client “username” will set up an appointment to discuss their project, upload videos, Images, Logos, Script, OMF, AAF and / or audio clips and provide the Video provider with detailed instructions against the time code so that the Video provider can obtain all the information necessary to carry out the project. The Video provider will review the upload, within maximum 5 hours and accept or provide feedback to the Client "username" on the changes to be made to the files. Once the assets becomes accepted by the Video provider, the project and fulfillment will begin within the specific term; The Video provider will deliver through the Customer's panel, within the platform ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇, sending notification to inform that the project is ready. The Video provider, in order to perform the provision of the service to the Client "username” could use other platforms such as cloud storage with different providers and upload information on said platforms, always taking care of confidentiality. When the Client "username" uploads the project, they accept that the material provided is their responsibility and only this will be used to carry out the project. The Video provider will keep a copy of all material supplied by the Client "username", including the material delivered by the Video provider, which will never be used for any other client, excluding the video and audio stock assets. The Video provider reserves the right not to save said information, at their discretion. This information will only serve as a backup, any modification at the request of the Client "username", will be taken as a new project or paid review. The Video provider is released from any content that Client "username" provides as project, including opinions, performances, interviews and points of view, news, audio, music, copyright, and others provided.

Workflow. There are two evaluation objects, which are interrelated: • The first evaluation object is a workflow, namely the production of language resources for an MT system. This workflow is divided into two sections following the two main approaches towards MT system creation, namely data-driven (SMT) and knowledge-driven (RMT) approaches. Within the RMT approach, again two workflows are evaluated: conventional techniques, and PANACEA-based techniques. As a result, three workflows need to be evaluated. This is shown in fig. 7-1. • The second evaluation object is a comparison of the translation quality produced by the respective workflows. This will imply, for each workflow, a comparison between the baseline system (before adaptation) and the adapted system.