Additional Investigations Clause Samples

The "Additional Investigations" clause allows one or both parties to conduct further inquiries or due diligence beyond the initial scope agreed upon in the contract. This may include activities such as site inspections, reviewing additional documents, or consulting with experts to verify information relevant to the agreement. By providing a formal mechanism for extra investigation, the clause helps ensure that all parties have access to the information they need to make informed decisions and reduces the risk of misunderstandings or undisclosed issues.
Additional Investigations. If the IRO identifies any transactions that were not supported by source documentation and/or were not appropriately included in, or excluded from, the calculation of AMP in accordance with King’s policies, procedures, and methodology, such transactions shall be considered an error. The IRO shall conduct such Additional Investigation as may be necessary to determine the root cause of the error. For example, the IRO may need to review additional Appendix B King Pharmaceuticals CIA documentation, conduct additional interviews with appropriate personnel, and/or review additional contracts to identify the root cause of the error. Upon completion of this review and Additional Investigation, if warranted, the IRO will report to the OIG its findings relating to any errors and their root cause(s). In the event the IRO finds more than one error for the quarter under review, the IRO will perform a second set of review procedures relating to the AMP calculations for the same quarter and population of data as in the first review. These additional review procedures will be developed in consultation with the OIG after King has submitted its management response to the IRO findings to the OIG, after the OIG has reviewed and considered King’s management response, and the OIG has determined that additional testing is warranted.
View Source
Additional Investigations. Information provided and/or requested under this section represents investigations that will be necessary for the Cogenerator to determine the capacity of the existing Compressor Station and to provide the City input on the Compressor Station’s capability to supply the NCEP Fuel Requirement and the Cogeneration Facilities' Fuel Requirement at NCCF, along with any potential reliability issues.
View Source
Additional Investigations. The Concessionaire shall evaluate all existing data of previous investigations for the construction of the new quay and the landside utilities and shall, if necessary, carry out all new investigations, if it considers that available information is not sufficient.
View Source
Additional Investigations. The City reserves the right to make such additional investigations as it deems necessary to establish the competence and financial stability of any offeror submitting a proposal.
View Source
Additional Investigations. Region 4 ESC reserves the right to make such additional investigations as it deems necessary to establish the capability of any Offeror. We understand and agree to this provision.
View Source
Additional Investigations. City may conduct additional investigations needed to determine the competence or financial stability of any Offeror.
View Source
Additional Investigations a. GSA conducted a GPR survey of the area agreed upon by GSA and DCSHPO (Exhibit 25), which encompasses Area N and other noncontiguous areas, which have the potential to be National Register-eligible. Additional archaeological resources were discovered during the GPR survey, and GSA consulted with the DCSHPO on measures to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects to the resources. GSA has documented the GPR findings in the appendix E of the ARMP and in Management Summary: St. Elizabeths West Campus GPR Survey Archaeological Investigations by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2015) and Preliminary Management Summary: St. Elizabeths West Campus Center Building Foundation Repair Archaeological Investigations by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2015). b. Per the Management Summary: St. Elizabeths West Campus GPR Survey Archaeological Investigations by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2015) and Preliminary Management Summary: St. Elizabeths West Campus Center Building Foundation Repair Archaeological Investigations by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2015), GSA has identified potentially National Register-eligible archaeological resources in 51SE046 Area F, 51SE046 adjacent to the north façade of Building 3 (West Wing), 51SE046 adjacent to the north façade of Building 1 (Center Building), 51SE046 adjacent to the east façade of Building 4 (East Wing), as well as 51SE046 Area N.
View Source
Additional Investigations. During the Lessee’s pre-survey meeting with the Lessor (see Addendum “C”, 2.1.2), the Lessee must present to the Lessor any proposed additional or alternate instrumentation and methods other than those described above, such as underwater imaging, diver investigation, remotely operated vehicles, coring, and additional survey lines.
View Source
Additional Investigations. If the IRO identifies any prices reviewed in Part One or Part Two of the Reported Prices Procedures for BP that were not accurately reflected in King’s systems and/or were not appropriately included in, or excluded from, King’s BP determination in accordance with King’s policies, procedures, and methodologies, such prices shall be considered an error. The IRO shall conduct such Additional Investigation as may be necessary to determine the root cause of the error. For example, the IRO may need to review additional documentation, conduct additional interviews with appropriate personnel, and/or review additional contracts to identify the root cause of the error. Upon completion of this review and Additional Investigation, if warranted, the IRO will report to the OIG its findings relating to any errors and their root cause(s). In the event the IRO finds more than one error for the quarter under review in Part One or Part Two testing, the IRO will perform a second set of Part One or Part Two testing procedures (i.e., Part One or Part Two testing depending which Part of the Reported Prices Procedures for BP resulted in an Additional Investigation being warranted) for the same quarter and population of data after King has submitted its management response to the IRO findings to the OIG, after the OIG has reviewed and considered King’s management response, and the OIG has determined that additional Part One or Part Two testing is warranted following consultations with King and the IRO. Should it be determined that additional Part One or Part Two testing is warranted, the IRO shall: a) If additional Part One testing is required, test a random selection of an additional five King Customers and contract Appendix B King Pharmaceuticals CIA prices associated with those Customers from the large King Customer pool; and/or b) If additional Part Two testing is required, test the next five Medicaid rebate eligible NDCs with the highest amounts of Medicaid rebates (total dollars) paid by King.
View Source

Related to Additional Investigations

  • Internal Investigations (A) The parties recognize that Florida Highway Patrol personnel occupy a special place in American society. Therefore, it is understood that the state has the right to expect that a professional standard of conduct be adhered to by all Florida Highway Patrol personnel regardless of rank or assignment. Since internal investigations may be undertaken to inquire into complaints of Florida Highway Patrol misconduct, the state reserves the right to conduct such investigations to uncover the facts in each case, but expressly agrees to carefully guard and protect the rights and dignity of accused personnel. In the course of an internal investigation, the investigative methods employed will be consistent with the law (including but not limited to section 112.532, F.S.) and this agreement; nothing in this agreement, however, shall be deemed to diminish the rights of employees under applicable law. (B) When an allegation is made against an employee, the state will make every reasonable effort to ensure that the allegation and any related statements are reduced to writing, under oath, and signed. The written allegation shall be known as a complaint. (C) When an employee is to be questioned or interviewed concerning a complaint or allegation, the employee will be informed prior to the interview of the nature of the investigation and whether he is the subject of the investigation or a witness in an investigation. Employees shall be informed of the right to have a union representative in attendance at the interview and where requested, an employee shall be given 48 hours to contact, consult with, and secure the attendance of a representative at the interview. If he is the subject of the investigation, the employee and his representative will also be informed of each complaint or allegation against him and they shall be permitted to review all written statements and recordings made by the complainant and witnesses at least two hours prior to the commencement of the interview in accordance with section 112, F.S. In the event the written statement or recordings are such that additional review time is warranted, the employee may request, and be granted, additional time unless the request is made for the purposes of delay. Pursuant to section 112.533, F.S., the employee who is the subject of the investigation shall not disclose the contents to anyone other than his representative or attorney until the investigation is complete. (D) Interviews and questioning of employees shall be conducted in a professional manner. Statements from an employee shall not be taken in a coercive manner. (E) The formal interrogation of an employee shall comply with the provisions of section 112.532, F.S. The employee shall receive a copy of his written or recorded statement at no cost to the employee. No recording or transcription of the investigative interview will be made without the knowledge of all participants present at the interview. (F) In cases where the agency determines that the employee’s absence from the work location is essential to the investigation and the employee cannot be reassigned to other duties pending completion of the investigation, the employee shall be placed on administrative leave with pay. Such leave shall be in accordance with Chapter 60L-34, F.A.C. (G) Unless required by statute, no employee shall be required to submit to a polygraph test or any device designed to measure the truthfulness of his responses during an investigation of a complaint or allegation. (H) Only sustained findings may be inserted in personnel records. Unfounded findings shall not be inserted in permanent personnel records or referred to in performance reviews. (I) Internal investigations will ordinarily be completed within 45 days from the date the complaint is filed, unless circumstances necessitate a longer period. An investigation shall not exceed 120 days without the approval of the Agency Head or designee. Except in the case of a criminal investigation, the employee shall be notified in writing of any investigation that exceeds 120 days. (J) The employee under investigation shall be advised in writing of the results of the investigation at its conclusion. (K) The state will make a good faith effort to train persons who investigate charges against employees in the investigative rights reserved for those employees in the interest of avoiding infringement of those rights. (L) In the case of criminal, non-administrative internal investigation into the criminal misconduct of a sworn employee, the provisions of (B) through (K) shall not apply.

  • Cooperation with Investigations You agree to cooperate with us in the investigation of unusual transactions, poor quality transmissions, and resolution of customer claims, including by providing, upon request and without further cost, any originals or copies of items deposited through the Service in your possession and your records relating to such items and transmissions.

  • COMPLAINTS AND INVESTIGATIONS 1. This article applies to complaints or allegations made externally and not from normal supervisory activities. 2. A department head shall be responsible for ensuring that all allegations of misconduct or other complaints against an employee on which any action is to be taken or a record is to be made shall be investigated. The investigator shall be allowed to interview the complainant prior to notifying the employee.

  • AUDITS AND INVESTIGATIONS 27.1 Each invoice paid by UNDP shall be subject to a post-payment audit by auditors, whether internal or external, of UNDP or by other authorized and qualified agents of UNDP at any time during the term of the Contract and for a period of three (3) years following the expiration or prior termination of the Contract. 27.2 UNDP may conduct investigations relating to any aspect of the Contract or the award thereof, the obligations performed under the Contract, and the operations of the Contractor generally relating to performance of the Contract at any time during the term of the Contract and for a period of three 27.3 The Contractor shall provide its full and timely cooperation with any such inspections, post- payment audits or investigations. Such cooperation shall include, but shall not be limited to, the Contractor’s obligation to make available its personnel and any relevant documentation for such purposes at reasonable times and on reasonable conditions and to grant to UNDP access to the Contractor’s premises at reasonable times and on reasonable conditions in connection with such access to the Contractor’s personnel and relevant documentation. The Contractor shall require its agents, including, but not limited to, the Contractor’s attorneys, accountants or other advisers, to reasonably cooperate with any inspections, post-payment audits or investigations carried out by UNDP hereunder. 27.4 UNDP shall be entitled to a refund from the Contractor for any amounts shown by such audits or investigations to have been paid by UNDP other than in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract. The Contractor also agrees that, where applicable, donors to UNDP whose funding is the source of, in whole or in part, the funding for the procurement of Goods and/or Services which are the subject of this Contract, shall have direct recourse to the Contractor for the recovery of any funds determined by UNDP to have been used in violation of or inconsistent with this Contract.

  • Geotechnical Investigation Perform in accordance with the City Design Manual and other City requirements as designated in writing by the Director.