Design Workshops Sample Clauses

The Design Workshops clause establishes the framework for collaborative sessions between the parties to develop and refine project concepts or solutions. Typically, this clause outlines the scheduling, participation requirements, and objectives of these workshops, ensuring that both parties contribute input and feedback during the design phase. Its core practical function is to facilitate effective communication and alignment on project goals, reducing misunderstandings and streamlining the design process.
Design Workshops. (a) In order to obtain user input in the preparation of, and prior to submitting, the Design Development Submittals and the Construction Document Submittals, the Parties will hold user group design workshops (the “Design Workshops”) upon the following terms: (i) the Project Co Representative shall arrange the Design Workshops in consultation with the SJHC Representative; (ii) the Parties shall cooperate to develop a reasonable schedule for the Design Workshops respecting user availability issues inherent in a 24/7 operating health care facility including the number and availability of SJHC clinical user groups, and shall incorporate such schedule into the Works Schedule; (iii) Project Co shall circulate to the SJHC Representative an agenda for each of the Design Workshops no later than 10 Business Days prior to the relevant Design Workshop; (iv) the Design Workshops shall be held in person, except where otherwise agreed by the Parties, acting reasonably; (v) Project Co shall maintain minutes of the Design Workshops, including possible design solutions and changes in design, and, within two Business Days after each Design Workshop, Project Co shall provide to the SJHC Representative a copy of the minutes, together with a copy of any notes, comments, sketches, drawings, tracings, lay-outs, plans or diagrams prepared at the Design Workshop; (vi) SJHC and Project Co agree that the subject matter of the Design Workshops shall not be regarded as Submittals to which Schedule 10 - Review Procedure applies, and that SJHC shall not be bound by the input provided in connection with the Design Workshops; (vii) Project Co shall submit to SJHC the Design Development Submittals or the Construction Document Submittals, as applicable, for review pursuant to Schedule 10 - Review Procedure; and (viii) the Parties agree that, with respect to the Design Development Submittals and the Construction Document Submittals, the period for review shall be 15 Business Days rather than the 10 Business Days prescribed in Section 2.2 of Schedule 10 - Review Procedure. (b) Prior to the 50% Design Development Submittals, the Parties will hold Design Workshops with respect to the following matters and any other Design Workshops required by Project Co, acting reasonably: (i) finalized departmental layouts; (ii) finalized cross-functional issues related to: (A) vertical/horizontal circulation diagrams; (B) elevator configuration; (C) materials management strategy; and (D) food service delivery...
View SourceView Similar (20)
Design Workshops. (a) In order to obtain user input in the preparation of, and prior to submitting, the Design Development Submittals and the Construction Document Submittals, the Parties will hold user group design workshops (the “Design Workshops”) upon the following terms: (i) the Project Co Representative shall arrange the Design Workshops in consultation with the Contracting Authority Representative; (ii) the Parties shall cooperate to develop a reasonable schedule for the Design Workshops respecting user availability issues inherent in an operating health care facility and the scheduling parameters set out in Section 11.3(a)(iii), and shall incorporate such schedule into the Works Schedule; (iii) (A) each Contracting Authority clinical user group shall require a minimum 3 rounds of meetings prior to the 50% Design Development Submittal; a minimum of 3 meetings between 50% and 100% Design Development Submittal, and a minimum of 2 meetings between 100% Design Development Submittal and 50% Construction Document Submittal;
View SourceView Similar (4)
Design Workshops a. Project team product review to prepare for design discussions b. Review of customer Contract Lifecycle Management process Your Conga Engagement Manager will share and review a detailed Project Solution Configuration document that will define specific fields, templates, and other applicable Professional Services deliverables as set forth in this SOW. After reviewing the Project Solution Configuration document during the Plan & Design phase, your Conga Team will continue with the following activities: 1. Repository deliverables include: a. Installation of the Following Conga Products: i. Contracts for Salesforce ii. Composer iii. Orchestrate iv. Conga Grid b. Provide the Legal Entity Object as a parent to the Contract Agreement object i. Create up to 5 customs fields c. Provide the ‘Contract Agreement’ object i. Provide 1 preconfigured page layout 1. Configure 2 record types 2. Create up to 10 Custom fields ii. Provide 3 pre-configured buttons: 1. 1 Conga Contracts for Salesforce ‘View Redlines’ button 2. 1 Conga Contracts for Salesforce ‘Send for Negotiation’ button 3. 1 Conga Contracts for Salesforce ‘True Up’ button iii. Build 1 custom Conga button: 1. 1 Conga Composer button which will support the creation of Contracts
View Source
Design Workshops. (a) In order to obtain user input in the preparation of, and prior to submitting, the Design Development Submittals and the Construction Document Submittals, the Parties will hold design review meetings (the “Design Review Meetings”) with the Contracting Authority Design Team and hold user group design workshops (the “Design Workshops”) beginning immediately after Commercial Close upon the following terms: (i) the Project Co Representative shall arrange the Design Review Meetings and Design Workshops in consultation with the Contracting Authority Representative; (ii) all Design Review Meetings and Design Workshops shall be held in ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, unless Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing; (iii) the Parties shall cooperate to develop a reasonable schedule for the Design Workshops respecting user availability issues inherent in an operating courthouse facility and the scheduling parameters set out in Section 11.3(a)(iv), and shall incorporate such schedule into the Works Schedule; (iv) (A) each Contracting Authority user group shall require a minimum 3 rounds of meetings prior to the 100% Design Development Submittal, and a minimum of 2 meetings between 100% Design Development Submittal and 100% Construction Document Submittal;
View Source
Design Workshops. (a) In order to obtain user input in the preparation of, and prior to submitting, the Design Development Submittals and the Construction Document Submittals, the Parties will hold user group design workshops (the “Design Workshops”) upon the following terms: (i) the Project Co Representative shall arrange the Design Workshops in consultation with the Contracting Authority Representative; (ii) the Parties shall cooperate to develop a reasonable schedule for the Design Workshops respecting user availability issues inherent in an operating health care facility and the scheduling parameters set out in Section 11.3(a)(iii), and shall incorporate such schedule into the Works Schedule; (iii) (A) each Contracting Authority clinical user group shall require a minimum 3 rounds of meetings prior to the [REDACTED]% Design Development Submittal; a minimum of 3 meetings between [REDACTED]% and [REDACTED]% Design Development Submittal, and a minimum of 2 meetings between [REDACTED]% Design Development Submittal and [REDACTED]% Construction Document Submittal;
View Source
Design Workshops. (a) In order to obtain user input in the preparation of, and prior to submitting, the Design Development Submittals and the Construction Document Submittals, the Parties will hold user group design workshops (the “Design Workshops”) upon the following terms: (i) the Project Co Representative shall arrange the Design Workshops in consultation with the HHS Representative; (ii) the Parties shall cooperate to develop a reasonable schedule for the Design Workshops respecting user availability issues inherent in an 24/7 operating health care facility and the scheduling parameters set out in Section 18.5(a)(iii) and shall incorporate such schedule into the Works Schedule; (A) Each HHS clinical user group shall require a minimum of three rounds of meetings prior to the 50% Design Development Submittal; a minimum of two meetings between the 50% and the 100% Design Development Submittal, and a minimum of two meetings between the 100% Design Development Submittal and the 50% Construction Document Submittal; (B) There shall be a minimum of ten Business Days between Design Workshops involving the same HHS clinical user group; (C) No more than five HHS clinical user groups shall meet with Project Co in any given week; (D) There shall be no more than two meetings involving the same HHS clinical user in the same week; and (E) The above criteria are for planning purposes only; actual user group availability shall be determined by HHS post Financial Close; (iv) Each round of Design Workshops described in Section 18.5(a)(iii)(A) shall conform to the following proposed agendae: (A) Round 1 – on all scales, review and demonstrate that non compliance issues have been resolved and become compliant (this shall be the platform for further design development); (B) Round 2 - refinement/improvement of the departmental design layout and circulation routes to user satisfaction; (C) Round 3 – room design; (D) Round 4 – room level circulation and functionality, lighting and equipment controls, coordination of equipment and room data sheet specifications; (E) Round 5 – verification of materials and finishes and updated room data sheet specifications; and (F) Round 6 – consensus building and user acceptance. (v) Project Co shall circulate to the HHS Representative a thorough agenda for each of the Design Workshops no later than ten Business Days prior to the relevant Design Workshop. The agenda package shall include, appropriate to the round of meeting described in Section 18.5(a)(iv): (A)...
View Source
Design Workshops 
View Source

Related to Design Workshops

  • Design Development An interim step in the design process. Design Development documents consist of plans, elevations, and other drawings and outline specifications. These documents will fix and illustrate the size and character of the entire project in its essentials as to kinds of materials, type of structure, grade elevations, sidewalks, utilities, roads, parking areas, mechanical and electrical systems, and such other work as may be required.

  • Design Development Phase 1.3.1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Documents, model(s) and any adjustments to the Program of Requirements, BIM Execution Plan or Amount Available for the Construction Contract authorized by the Owner, the Architect/Engineer shall prepare, for approval by the Owner and review by the Construction Manager, Design Development Documents derived from the model(s) in accordance with Owner’s written requirements to further define and finalize the size and character of the Project in accordance with the BIM Execution Plan, “Facility Design Guidelines” and any additional requirements set forth in Article 15. The Architect/Engineer shall review the Design Development documents as they are being modeled at intervals appropriate to the progress of the Project with the Owner and Construction Manager at the Project site or other location specified by Owner in the State of Texas. The Architect/Engineer shall utilize the model(s) to support the review process during Design Development. The Architect/Engineer shall allow the Construction Manager to utilize the information uploaded into Owner’s PMIS to assist the Construction Manager in fulfilling its responsibilities to the Owner. 1.3.2 As a part of Design Development Phase, Architect/Engineer shall accomplish model coordination, aggregation and “clash detection” to remove conflicts in design between systems, structures and components. Architect/Engineer shall utilize Owner’s PMIS to accomplish model coordination and collaborate with Construction Manager in the resolution of critical clashes identified by the Construction Manager. Architect/Engineer shall demonstrate and provide written assurance to Owner that conflicts/collisions between models have been resolved. 1.3.3 The Architect/Engineer shall review the Estimated Construction Cost prepared by the Construction Manager, and shall provide written comments. 1.3.4 Before proceeding into the Construction Document Phase, the Architect/Engineer shall obtain Owner’s written acceptance of the Design Development documents and approval of the mutually established Amount Available for the Construction Contract and schedule. 1.3.5 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare presentation materials including an animation derived from the model(s) as defined in “Facility Design Guidelines” at completion of Design Development and if so requested shall present same to the Board of Regents at a regular meeting where scheduled within the state. 1.3.6 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare preliminary recommended furniture layouts for all spaces where it is deemed important to substantiate the fulfillment of program space requirements, or to coordinate with specific architectural, mechanical and electrical elements. 1.3.7 Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner, if requested, with seeking approval of the Project by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). Such assistance shall include (i) the preparation of a listing of the rooms and square footages in the Project, and (ii) the preparation of project cost information, in accordance with THECB Guidelines. This information shall be provided at the completion of the Design Development Phase when requested by the Owner. The listing of rooms and square footages shall then be updated to reflect any changes occurring during construction and provided to the Owner at Substantial Completion. 1.3.8 At the completion of the Design Development Phase, or such other time as Owner may specify to Architect/Engineer, at Owner’s sole option and discretion, Owner will furnish Architect/Engineer with a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal prepared by Construction Manager based upon the Design Development documents prepared by the Architect/Engineer and approved by the Owner. The Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner and endeavor to further and advocate the Owner’s interests in Owner’s communications with the Construction Manager in an effort to develop a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal acceptable to Owner, in Owner’s sole option and discretion. If the Owner does not accept the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, the Architect/Engineer shall participate with the Owner and Construction Manager in constructability reviews and shall revise the documents as necessary in order to reach an agreement. If the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal exceeds the Schematic Design Phase Estimated Construction Cost prepared by, or otherwise accepted by the Construction Manager due to an increase in the scope of the Project caused by further development of the design documents by the Architect/Engineer to the extent that such could not be reasonably inferred by the Construction Manager from the Schematic Design documents, and Owner directs Architect/Engineer to revise the documents, the Architect/Engineer shall revise the documents at its own expense so that the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal for constructing the Project shall not exceed the Owner’s Amount Available for the Construction Contract and any previously approved Estimated Construction Costs. If it is determined to be in the Owner’s best interest, instead of requiring the Architect/Engineer to revise the Drawings and Specifications, the Owner reserves the right to accept a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that exceeds the stipulated Amount Available for the Construction Contract. The Architect/Engineer shall analyze the final Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal document, together with its supporting assumptions, clarifications, and contingencies, and shall submit a detailed written analysis of the document to the Owner. Such analysis shall include, without limitation, reference to and explanation of any inaccurate or improper assumptions and clarifications. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the Owner’s rejection of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal is not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein. 1.3.9 After the Guaranteed Maximum Price has been accepted, the Architect/Engineer shall incorporate necessary revisions into the Design Development documents. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the revisions are required as the result of inaccurate assumptions and clarifications made in the development of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that are not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein.

  • Design Phase All Basic Services set forth in the Agreement with the exception of Interdisciplinary Document Coordination Review, conducting a Card Trick session, Value-Engineering services, Estimating services. • All Basic Services set forth in the Agreement. • All Basic Services set forth in the Agreement. • All Basic Services set forth in the Agreement.

  • Design ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Plan and Aligned Budget

  • Creative Work The Executive agrees that all creative work and work product, including but not limited to all technology, business management tools, processes, software, patents, trademarks, and copyrights developed by the Executive during the term of this Agreement, regardless of when or where such work or work product was produced, constitutes work made for hire, all rights of which are owned by the Employer. The Executive hereby assigns to the Employer all rights, title, and interest, whether by way of copyrights, trade secret, trademark, patent, or otherwise, in all such work or work product, regardless of whether the same is subject to protection by patent, trademark, or copyright laws.