Findings and Recommendations Clause Samples

Findings and Recommendations. The Hearing Officer within ten (10) city business days after conclusion of the hearing shall submit his findings and recommendations to the City Manager. The recommendations of the Hearing Officer are advisory only and may be accepted, rejected or modified by the City Manager.

Findings and Recommendations. The Hearing Officer shall, as soon as possible after the conclusion of the hearing, certify his/her findings and decisions in writing to the City Council and to the appellant. The City Council shall review the findings and recommendations of the Hearing Officer and may then affirm, revoke or modify the action taken as, on its judgment, seems warranted, and the action taken shall be final. The Hearing Officer may submit a minority or supplemental finding and recommendation. In the case of suspension, discharge or demotion, the appointing power shall reinstate an employee to the employee’s former status if the City Council determines that the action was for discriminatory reasons.

Findings and Recommendations. The PIRC’s reports may contain Findings and Recommendations.

Findings and Recommendations. KMA will summarize the key findings from the Phase 2 market assessment, Phase 3 financial feasibility analysis, and Phase 4 financing approaches.

Findings and Recommendations. ‌ Preliminary findings were drafted by the Demand Management Work Group and Water Forum.

Findings and Recommendations. A written report required under ORS 419A.116 that addresses reasonable efforts, case compliance, parental progress, progress toward alleviating the need for placement, the need for and appropriateness of placement, a likely date to return home, and other problems, solutions or alternatives.

Findings and Recommendations. The Terms of Reference (TOR) of this review encompassed the operations, science, and leadership of the IATTC and AIDCP. Findings and recommendations for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the IATTC and AIDCP are grouped into three categories: • Governance, addressing the appointed leadership of the Commission; • Management, focusing on the day-to-day operations of the Secretariat; and • Science, assessing the progress, outcomes, and processes of the IATTC’s scientific operations including bycatch management; and compliance. A. GOVERNANCE‌ 1. Limitations of the Consensus Model Similar to other tRFMOs, the IATTC and AIDCP governing bodies operate under a consensus model, as outlined in Article IX of the Antigua Convention. Consensus is the most egalitarian, collaborative decision-making model, but it has limitations. Chiefly, consensus tends to support the status quo and impede change, which can lead to stagnation. Occasionally, blocking is used as leverage, which can cause dysfunction in an organization. In a survey of IATTC commissioners and AIDCP representatives, “problem solving methods” were rated the least efficient area of the Commission and “decision-making processes” were rated the third least efficient. The Antigua Convention states that “Unless provided otherwise, all decisions made by the Commission at meetings convened pursuant to Article VIII of this Convention shall be by consensus of members of the Commission present at the meeting in question.” The Convention specifically outlines matters that must be decided by consensus. However, there is no clarification in the rules of procedure which matters can be decided by a simple majority, and the IATTC does not have any established voting procedures. The impact of the consensus model can be seen across all tRFMOs, as measures tend to be weakened to accommodate self-interest rather than the best interest of the stocks or the species under consideration. The consensus model has had negative impacts on multiple situations in recent years, including the selection of chairs for meetings in IATTC, delays in commencing meetings, and an inability to come to an agreement on such issues such as Pacific blue fin tuna and silky shark.

Findings and Recommendations. Synthesize data and create a framework of findings- end of Month 16 •Make final recommendations for consideration by CEC and ODOE - end of Month 17 Scope of Work/Work Program Task 1.0 Project Administration, Contractor Selection, and Stakeholder/Public Outreach

Findings and Recommendations. The Personnel Board shall, within ten (10) days after the conclusion of the hearing, certify its findings and decision in writing to the appellant and to the person, officer or body from whose action the appeal was taken. The person, officer or body from whose action the appeal was taken shall review the findings and recommendations of the Personnel Board and may then affirm, revoke or modify the action taken as, in its judgment, seems warranted, and the action taken shall be final. Any member of the Personnel Board may submit a minority or supplemental finding and recommendation. In case of suspension, discharge or demotion, the Personnel Board shall reinstate any employee to his former status if proof is made that the action was for political, religious or racial reasons. The grievance mechanism is set forth in Personnel Rule XIII which reads as set forth below with the addition of the fact that a grievance shall be defined as a good faith complaint of one or a group of employees, or a dispute between the City and the Association involving the interpretation, application, or enforcement of the express terms of this MOU.