Freedom of Speech Clause Samples

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Freedom of Speech. The Client acknowledges that the University has a duty to ensure that freedom of speech is afforded for students, employees and visiting speakers. The Client must inform the University at the time of making the reservation of any potential controversial activities which may occur whilst present on the University’s premises which could affect the reputation of the University.
Freedom of Speech. The Client, as organiser of a seminar, conference, meeting or other assembly, is required to undertake to secure that the principles embodied in the University’s Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech, pursuant to its statutory duty under Section 43 (3) of the Education (No 2) ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, will be upheld; and shall, if so required, satisfy the University of its ability to discharge its obligations in regard to upholding freedom of speech.
Freedom of Speech. 1. A disciplinary measure can only be imposed for a violation of article 125 a., first paragraph, of the Public Service Act after advice has been obtained by a committee appointed by the organization, as much as possible in collaboration with the other organizations. 2. In collaboration with the other organizations, the organization shall where possible determine rules concerning the composition and the working method of this committee. 3. The employer shall indicate with his decision to impose a disciplinary measure, as meant in the first paragraph, whether this was reached in conformity with the advice obtained.
Freedom of Speech. The role of universities in ensuring free speech is reinforced in two pieces of legislation in the UK: 1. The 1986 Education Action states that: “persons concerned in the government of any establishment...shall take such steps as are reasonably practicable to ensure that freedom of speech within the law is secured for members, students and employees of the establishment and for visiting speakers.” The University will not, therefore, as far as is reasonably practicable, deny access to its premises or platforms to individuals or bodies on the basis of their beliefs, views, or policies. 2. The Equality Act 2010 covers the following protected characteristics: age, disability, gender, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief and sexual orientation. The associated public sector equality duty requires universities, in the exercise of their functions, to have due regard to the need to: • eliminate discrimination, harassment and victimisation and any other conduct that is prohibited under the Act; • advance equality of opportunity between people who share a relevant protected characteristic and people who do not share it; • ▇▇▇▇▇▇ good relations between people who share a relevant protected characteristic and those who do not share it. The University expects students, staff, governors, the Students’ Unions and visitors to ensure that freedom of speech within the law is assured. Whilst there is no legal prohibition in the UK on offending others, the University, nevertheless, believes that discussion that is open and honest can take place only if offensive or unnecessarily provocative action and language is avoided. Students, staff, governors, the Students’ Unions and visiting speakers are, therefore, required to demonstrate sensitivity to the diversity of the University community, and to show others respect. The University has a Code of Practice with which it expects its staff and student to comply. This can be found at: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/news/events/freedomofspeechpolicy/
Freedom of Speech. By giving users access to this system, the school does not intend to create a limited or a public forum for the expression of opinion. The network exists as part of the mission of Calvary Bible Church and Northside Christian School, and is operated solely in support of that mission. Neither the guests, staff, nor students are invited to use the school’s network in expression of their opinion.
Freedom of Speech. 1. Employees in the Unit do not give up their Constitutional rights during work hours. These Constitutional rights are not absolute, however, for they must be exercised with regard to any effect on pupils, the level of community tolerance and any applicable legal sanctions. Employees should exercise their right of free speech in such a manner as to provide a positive and wholesome model for pupils to imitate. 2. KCPS and the SEIU agree that the use of profanity, racial epithets and harassing or discriminatory comments shall not be tolerated by anyone in KCPS schools including: Administration, staff, students and visitors.
Freedom of Speech. 59.01 When exercising their fundamental rights to freedom of speech as expressed in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, members are responsible to ensure that their private actions are not interpreted as representing Yukon University. 59.02 All employees are entitled to their political rights provided they respect their obligations to the Employer as specified in the Collective Agreement. 59.03 Freedom of expression, a fundamental freedom, applies to everyone in Canada. Members shall not be hindered from exercising their legal rights as citizens by the University. 59.04 An employee who legitimately exercises their right to free speech, shall not be given reasonable cause to fear intimidation, interference, harassment, or reprisal by the University as a result of their exercise of this right.
Freedom of Speech. To the extent permitted by the Hatch Act and other applicable law and regulations including those concerning the expenditure of appropriated funds, employees may exercise their First Amendment rights without fear of penalty or reprisal by the Agency. Any right of employees, individually or collectively, to petition Congress or a Member of Congress, or to furnish information to either House of Congress, or to a committee or Member thereof, may not be interfered with or denied by the Agency.
Freedom of Speech. The Union shall comply with the requirements of the Education (No.
Freedom of Speech. The University and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ the principle of freedom of speech within the law, working collaboratively to promote academic freedom and freedom of speech and enacting the provision of the law, following established procedures for organising events. Both parties agree to comply with relevant policies and regulations in relation to lawful and secure data sharing, in line with the provisions of the data sharing agreement between the University and HASU.