Land Use and Planning Sample Clauses

Land Use and Planning. Noise - The proposed Agreement will not have any noise impacts, and will not change the impacts identified in the City’s CEQA documents.

Land Use and Planning. Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less than significant Impact No Impact Would the project:

Land Use and Planning. Environmental impacts due to conflicts with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect must be analyzed. ⮚ Mineral Resources Information on mineral resources will be referenced and supplemented as necessary. ⮚ Noise Using existing information such as community plans, the technical studies prepared by Humboldt County in support of the General Plan Update and noise contours for major transportation facilities prepared by other agencies, the potential for noise impacts to limit the development potential or to require sound mitigation strategies during construction must be determined. Construction noise will also be addressed. Existing policies regarding construction and development in noise impacted areas will be addressed. ⮚ Population and Housing Population and housing effects will be described in the context of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment and the policies of the adopted Housing Element. An estimate will be prepared of the number of residents expected to be accommodated within the project area, upon full buildout.

Land Use and Planning. The EIR will evaluate the Specific Plan’s compatibility with existing land uses and development patterns and evaluate the proposed plan’s consistency with other adopted City plans and policies. The analysis will identify whether the project would result in the physical division of an established community.

Land Use and Planning. The proposed Project would demolish 103,000 square feet of industrial and office uses and build residential units and an office building. The land use and planning section will evaluate consistency with applicable City General Plan policies and zoning requirements, including the Municipal Code Ordinance No. 1026, and other relevant City planning documents. This section will also consider the proposed Project’s compatibility with adjacent existing development, roadways, and public utilities. This section will analyze whether the proposed changes in land use and zoning designations would adversely affect the City’s long-range land use planning goals.

Land Use and Planning. 3.10.1 Existing Conditions‌ The District approved the LRP, which pertains to the District Parcel, in November 2008. Phase 1, the existing one-acre ATEP campus, is currently offering educational programs. The Phase 3A Concept Plan, a 28-acre expansion of the ATEP campus, was approved and CEQA review (in the form of an Addendum to the FEIS/EIR) was completed by the District in March 2009. Most of the former military buildings on the District Parcel have been demolished. No specific development for the County Parcel has been proposed. The County parcel is still under the control of the Navy, and will remain so until the FOST is issued. Remnants of former MCAS Tustin buildings and infrastructure remain on the site, but are vacant and unused. 3.10.2 Project Impact Evaluation‌ a) Would the project physically divide an established community? Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less than Significant Impact No Impact b) Would the project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less than Significant Impact No Impact c) Would the project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Potentially Significant Impact Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporation Less than Significant Impact No Impact Responses to a-c: No Impact Due to No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis: Implementation of the Project will not cause any direct impacts to land use and planning. The Proposed Project only exchanges ultimate property ownership of two parcels between the District and the County. There would be no change to development intensity, building height restrictions, setbacks, signage, and other development standards. There are no new or increased significant adverse project-specific or cumulative impacts with regard to land use and planning that are identified as a result of the adoption and implementation of the Project. There is no new information relative to land use and planning that was not in existence at the time the FEIS/EIR was prepared. Therefore, the Project and its implementation are consistent with the FEIS/EIR and no new mitigatio...

Land Use and Planning. The proposed Agreement will not have any impact on Land Use and Planning, and will not change the impacts identified in the County’s CEQA documents.

Land Use and Planning. Regulation & Planning; Plan Check, Building Inspection and Code Enforcement. County: County continues to provide land use planning, plan check, building inspection and code enforcement. CHLSD: No responsibilities.

Land Use and Planning. This section will address consistency of the proposed project with applicable local and regional plans, policies, and projections. Consistency with the Burbank 2035 General Plan and the Southern California Association of Governments’ Regional Comprehensive Plan, Compass Blueprint, and Regional Transportation Plan will be assessed. Applicable land-use designations, policies, development standards, and planning projections will be identified, including those contained in the City’s Burbank 2035 General Plan, City Zoning Ordinance, and City Development Standards. A complete and detailed description of the existing development and uses around the Premier at First site will be provided to serve as a basis for this analysis. The policies in the Burbank 2035 General Plan for the Downtown Commercial area will be identified and described. This project site is located at the eastern edge of the City’s Downtown Commercial area as defined in the City’s General Plan, which recognizes this area as being suitable for a higher intensity of development due to the direct and convenient access to public transit, including buses and trains, and the compact nature of the street grid, which facilitates walking and easy pedestrian access. The circulation system in this portion of the City is currently changing due to the extension of First Street east from its current terminus to the site of the new IKEA Store. Analysis of project consistency with goals, objectives, policies, and standards from these documents will be prepared to demonstrate the consistency of the proposed residential, hotel, or office uses with current land use plans and policies. Meridian Consultants will prepare analysis of potential noise impacts from construction and occupancy and use of the two buildings proposed. The noise section will identify and address existing City of Burbank plans and policies that currently govern construction, stationary source, and mobile noise and vibration relative to the proposed development. To document existing conditions, Meridian Consultants will conduct noise monitoring at up to 8 locations in the project area to determine ambient noise levels. Existing mobile source noise levels along roadways in the project vicinity that will carry 1 percent or more of project traffic will be calculated using the Federal Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model and presented in the noise impact analysis. Parameters used in the model will be based on average daily trips, traffic mix, day/e...