PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS & EVALUATIONS Sample Clauses

The PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS & EVALUATIONS clause sets out the standards and criteria by which a party’s work or services will be measured during the contract term. It typically outlines specific benchmarks, deliverables, or quality metrics that must be met, and may describe the process for periodic reviews or assessments of performance. This clause ensures both parties have a clear understanding of what is required, helps track progress, and provides a basis for addressing underperformance or rewarding satisfactory results.
PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS & EVALUATIONS. Supervisors/managers should provide employees with a job description and related performance expectations during employee onboarding and consistently through employ. The job description should be reviewed with the employee to ensure that it accurately reflects current responsibilities and expectations. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ State University has established a system of performance evaluation for all Staff employees that is consistent and continuous and emphasizes communication between supervisors and employees. This performance evaluation system shall be for the purpose of career development, making decisions regarding transfer, promotion, demotion, retention, supervisory assistance, employee training and development, and for consideration in salary (based on availability of funds). The supervisor/manager shall evaluate all Staff employees in a systematic manner at specified time intervals, but no less than once each year, to assess and ensure optimal employee performance, document acceptable and unacceptable performance, and to assist in performance improvement planning for employees performing below standards or below capability. An employee within their provisional period should be evaluated at least once prior to the completion of the provisional period. Please note that counseling an employee and holding them accountable for performance of assigned duties and responsibilities and/or behavior/conduct do not constitute harassment or an act of creating a hostile or intimidating environment. In January of 2022, the university migrated to the OneUSG ePerformance module as its system of record for performance evaluations. This digital system for evaluations is not the official evaluation tool for ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ State University. Completed evaluations, electronically signed by two levels of supervision (immediate and secondary) and the employee, are to be submitted in the ePerformance module upon completion and will become part of the employee’s personnel record. Employees have 30 days from the date of signature on the evaluation to include any comments with the evaluation. Performance evaluations are not subject to the employee grievance process.
PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS & EVALUATIONS. Supervisors/managers should provide employees with a job description and related performance expectations during employee onboarding and consistently through employ. The job description should be reviewed with the employee to ensure that it accurately reflects current responsibilities and expectations. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ State University has established a system of performance evaluation for all Staff employees that is consistent and continuous, and emphasizes communication between supervisors and employees. This performance evaluation system shall be for the purpose of career development, making decisions regarding transfer, promotion, demotion, retention, supervisory assistance, employee training and development, and for consideration in salary (based on availability of funds). The supervisor/manager shall evaluate all Staff employees in a systematic manner at specified time intervals, but no less than once each year, to assess and ensure optimal employee performance, document acceptable and unacceptable performance, and to assist in performance improvement planning for employees performing below standards or below capability. An employee within their provisional period should be evaluated at least once prior to the completion of the provisional period. Performance Evaluation Forms are available through the Department of Human Resources. Completed evaluations, signed by two levels of supervision (immediate and secondary) and the employee, are to be submitted to Human Resources upon completion, and will become part of the employee’s personnel record. Employees have 30 days from the date of signature on the evaluation to include any comments with the evaluation.

Related to PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS & EVALUATIONS

  • Performance Expectations The Charter School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the CPF shall provide the basis upon which the SCSC will decide whether to renew the Charter School’s Charter Contract at the end of the charter term. This section shall not preclude the SCSC from considering other relevant factors in making renewal decisions.

  • Performance Evaluations Employee performance shall be evaluated and communicated on a yearly basis as required under County policy. Performance evaluations are used to demonstrate to employees that they are valued; record how an employee’s performance meet the requirements of the job; create a job history record; identify employee strengths and areas for enhancement; assist the employee and supervisor in an effort to attain the highest level of performance; and reinforce performance standards. Every effort will be made to include substantiated information within an employee’s performance evaluation. Non-recurring discipline history which is more than two (2) years old will not be referenced in performance evaluations. The County shall ensure employee performance evaluations are conducted in accordance with County and departmental policy. Performance evaluations and disciplinary matters shall only be conducted by County employees. When an employee who does not agree with the overall rating he/she receives on his/her written performance evaluation, he/she shall discuss and attempt to resolve the differences with his/her immediate supervisor. If discussion with his/her immediate supervisor does not result in resolution of the differences, the employee may file a written request to meet with the next level of management. Said request shall state the unresolved issues and the specific changes in the written performance evaluation the employee is seeking. The appropriate manager shall meet with the employee to discuss the unresolved issues. If the issues are not resolved to the employee’s satisfaction following discussion with the appropriate manager, the employee may within thirty (30) working days file a written request for a meeting with the department head. Within fourteen (14) working days of receipt of a written request stating the unresolved issues and the desired changes in the written performance evaluation, the department head shall meet with the employee to discuss the issues. Within ten (10) working days of said meeting, the department head shall respond in writing to the employee. The decision of the Department Head shall be final and not subject to the grievance procedure. An employee may submit a written response to his/her evaluation that shall be placed in his/her personnel file.

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Excused The Affected Party, to the extent rendered unable to perform its obligations or part thereof under this Agreement as a consequence of the Force Majeure Event shall be excused from performance of the obligations. Provided that, the excuse from performance shall be of no greater scope and of no longer duration than is reasonably warranted by the Force Majeure Event. Provided further, nothing contained herein shall absolve the Affected Party from any payment obligations accrued prior to the occurrence of the underlying Force Majeure Event.