Population Management Clause Samples
Population Management. 11.2.1. Contractor shall design and implement population management activities in alignment with the Population Management Framework and Department’s risk stratification methodology. Department’s risk stratification methodology captures both the physical and behavioral health needs of Members.
11.2.1.1. Contractor shall place a particular focus on Members identified as Complex Members for outreach and interventions, including care coordination.
11.2.1.2. Contractor may substitute their own population management approach for serving Complex Members with Department approval.
11.2.1.2.1. Contractor shall leverage data and resources to risk stratify beyond the Complex Member population to effectively meet the unique needs of their assigned members more broadly.
11.2.1.3. Contractor shall collaborate with Department to evolve the Population Management Framework and risk stratification methodology as appropriate.
11.2.2. Contractor’s population management activities shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
11.2.2.1. Member engagement and outreach,
11.2.2.2. Wellness promotion,
11.2.2.3. Utilization of evidence-based and promising practices,
11.2.2.4. Programs for managing Department identified health conditions, and
11.2.2.5. Care Coordination for Members utilizing Medicaid services.
11.2.2.6. Addressing identified health disparities among enrolled Members.
11.2.3. Contractor shall provide practice support to Network Providers and Health Neighborhood providers to support them with implementing Contractor’s population management activities.
11.2.3.1. Contractor shall implement incentive arrangements and financial structures that reward Network Providers and Health Neighborhood providers for delivering increased value and improved outcomes in alignment with Contractor’s population management activities.
11.2.4. Contractor shall implement and evaluate evidence-based and proven programs designed to improve the health of department targeted populations and prevent disease progression of department identified health conditions.
11.2.4.1. Contractor shall utilize existing programs among its network providers to manage and support members with specific health conditions.
11.2.4.2. Contractor shall develop programs to manage and support members with specific health conditions identified by Department for which Contractor’s network providers do not have existing programs.
11.2.4.3. Contractor shall incorporate evidence-based practices, and promising local init...
Population Management. Contractor shall utilize a population management approach to manage Contractor’s overall Member population, identify, and manage health and health-related social needs, address health disparities, and achieve better health outcomes while reducing unnecessary costs and services.
Population Management. PEDIGREE DATA §1
Population Management. As per population modelling run by NatureScot a minimal cull of 1544 red deer is needed to continue to deliver the Section 7 population density target. C ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ provided information on the CNPA hind venison scheme. This is a new scheme which encourages culling of ▇▇▇▇▇ (& calves) above the property 3 year average. Once the property reaches110% of the 3 year average then they can be paid from the 85% hind (and subsequent calf) through to the 110% hind, up to a total 150% all at a rate of £70 per head. This scheme is open to all signatories of the Caenlochan Section 7 scheme, whether in or out of the park, and also the wider SGDMG members. Any property interested in the scheme to make contact with CMaclean @ the CNPA. Prior to the meeting estates had provided the following as provisional cull targets for the 2024/25 period which provide a total of 1810 red deer for the Caenlochan Section 7 area. Stags ▇▇▇▇▇ Calves Auchavan** 40 60 24 ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇** 40 60 24 ▇▇▇▇ Isla House 30 30 10 Invercauld Glenshee 50 80 32 Tulchan** 80 150 60 2 Balmoral Bachnagairn 30 45 18 Clova (South) 25 40 16 Coire Fee 3 5 2 ▇▇▇▇ Head & ▇▇▇▇ Damh 30 80 16 FLS / ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇* ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ FLS ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇* 60 50 25 3 Invercauld Glencallater 60 60 20 *FLS stated an overall cull target of 400 and 135 red deer at FLS ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & FLS Glendoll respectively, which has been split down. Please note that cull reporting for FLS ▇▇▇▇▇▇ is both the open hill property and fenced older forestry block. ** Auchavan, Glencally & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ confirmed after the meeting. ▇▇ stated that assistance from NatureScot during the hind cull may be needed for 24/25. NG & JI to liaise as season progresses. GT stated that if the above overall cull target is delivered then based on the population model the S7 area would be close to delivery the density target. NatureScot’s advice would be that the estates should increase hind culls slightly in order to meet this target. Members felt culls as provided were more inline with their expectations under the agreement. Due to the likely proximity to the density target for the Section 7 area it was suggested that the deer count should be carried out in Spring 2025 to update the population information. Whilst there was some discussion around whether a summer count should be conducted, all present were in agreement for a count in 2025 and the preference would be for this to be done in spring – i.e. late March/ April. This count will aim to cover the same extent as in 2022 and may extend t...
Population Management. Many of the strategies refer the local reader/manager to broader protocols or strategies in the preceding “Rangewide Strategy” section. Note that the strategies are not presented in any order of priority; all the strategies given for each population are important. The guidance provided here may be used to update local conservation plans. The targets and recommended strategies are thought to be sufficient to conserve GUSG. However, local groups may choose to aim for additional conservation measures. Local conservation targets were established by analyzing the modeled population capacity based on the current occupied acreage, the currently un-occupied (but apparently suitable) habitat, and the amount of habitat that could potentially be created through restoration and management of currently unsuitable, but potential habitat (Table 32). Potential, but currently unsuitable habitat was a broad category that included areas not likely to be convertible to sage-grouse habitat given any degree of economic sustainability (such as cropland in Dove Creek and Monticello, or houses in ▇▇▇▇▇ Mesa), so not all habitat in that category was considered when establishing targets. Assumptions used about habitat suitability are discussed within each population summary. For data analysis in this section as well as in “Analysis of Population Size in Relation to the Amount of Available Habitat” (pg. 186), we refined the “Occupied Habitat” category. Local CDOW and UDWR biologists identified vegetation classes that are used by GUSG within the “Occupied Habitat” category for each population (data from the CVCP or the Utah Gap Analysis dataset). For instance, the “Occupied Habitat” boundary may have included classes not used by grouse, but found scattered within the boundary (e.g., ponderosa pine). These classes were eliminated from the analysis used to determine acreage needed to support certain numbers of grouse. Hence, the “Occupied Habitat” numbers in tables within this section are a subset of the actual occupied habitat acreage and are referenced as selected classes. The “Vacant” and “Potential” habitat categories were not refined or changed. CCAA Appendix D: Page 33 Table 32. Occupied, vacant, and potential habitat, modeled population capability, recent population size, and future population target, by GUSG population. See “RCP Habitat Mapping” for definitions of habitat types (pg. 54), and see “Status and Distribution of Individual Populations” (pg. 56) for maps of occupied, v...
Population Management. Monitor population and area to detect changes in GUSG numbers and distribution.
Population Management. Where an influx of Prisoners from court results in a Prison exceeding its agreed capacity, the Service Provider shall escort Prisoners to an alternative Prison for this purpose as directed by the Purchaser. The Service Provider will seek to utilise the inter-prison transfer matrix for such movements however where there is an excessive time lapse until the next transfer day the Purchaser may request an additional transfer. A minimum period of 48 hours’ notice of escort requirement will normally apply. For escorts from HMP YOI Cornton Vale, and thereafter the new National Women’s Facility, daily transfers may take place.
Population Management. Predator control may be appropriate under certain circumstances to improve the viability of small and isolated populations. This practice should not be undertaken without a complete understanding of LPC and predator population dynamics, and a clearly stated objective for the management action.