Position Review Process Sample Clauses

The Position Review Process clause establishes a formal procedure for evaluating and assessing an individual's job role or responsibilities within an organization. Typically, this process involves periodic reviews where an employee's performance, duties, and alignment with organizational goals are examined, often including feedback from supervisors or peers. By setting out clear steps and criteria for these reviews, the clause ensures transparency and consistency in how positions are managed, helping to address issues such as role ambiguity, performance concerns, or the need for role adjustments.
Position Review Process. (a) The University, employee, or employee representative may request that a position be reviewed when the requesting party believes that the basis of its request has become a permanent requirement of the position. Employees and employee representatives may not request that a position be reviewed more often than once every six (6) months. (b) The request must be complete and in writing on forms provided by the University. Requests may be submitted to Human Resources or to an employee’s direct supervisor or department. Any party may submit additional information, including the names of individuals, which the party believes is relevant to the position review. (c) An employee may request that a representative be present as an observer at meetings with the University reviewer scheduled to discuss the request for position review. At the employee's request a portion of such meetings shall be conducted in a quiet and private location, away from the work station. (d) The University reviewer will investigate the position and issue a written response to the employee or employee representative within sixty (60) calendar days from receipt, by Human Resources, of the completed request. The response will include notification of the class and salary assigned when the position is reallocated, or notification of the reasons the position does not warrant reallocation when the request is not approved. Reclass requests may be submitted at either the departmental level or directly to Human Resources. Reclass requests submitted at the departmental level must be forwarded to Human Resources within thirty (30) calendar days. (e) The effective date of allocations or reallocations initiated by the University shall be determined by the University. The effective date of a reallocation resulting from an employee or employee representative request for position review will be established as the 1st or the 16th of the month which precedes the date that the completed request was filed with Human Resources or the employee’s direct supervisor or department, whichever date is earliest. The date of receipt must be appropriately documented. (f) An employee may request reconsideration following receipt of the University's determination. Requests for reconsideration will not hold the timeframe for filing an appeal under this Article.
View SourceView Similar (64)
Position Review Process. A. The Employer or employee representative may request that a position be reviewed when the requesting party believes that the basis of its request has become a permanent requirement of the position. Employees and employee representatives may not request that a position be reviewed more often than once every six (6) months. B. The request must be complete and in writing on forms provided by the Employer. Requests may be submitted to IHME Human Resources. C. The UWHR Compensation Office will investigate the position and issue a written response to the employee or employee representative within sixty (60) calendar days from receipt, by Human Resources, of the completed request. The response will include notification of the class and salary assigned when the position is reallocated, or notification of the reasons the position does not warrant reallocation when the request is not approved. D. The effective date of allocations or reallocations initiated by the Employer shall be determined by the Employer. The effective date of a reallocation resulting from an employee representative request for position review will be established as the 1st or the 16th of the month which precedes the date that the completed request was filed with IHME Human Resources or the employee’s direct supervisor or department, whichever date is earliest. The date of receipt must be appropriately documented.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Position Review Process. 40 A. The Employer or employee representative may request that a position be reviewed 41 when the requesting party believes that the basis of its request has become a 42 permanent requirement of the position, either through reclassification or proposing a new 43 classification. Employees and employee representatives may not request that a position 44 be reviewed more often than once every six (6) months. 45 B. The request must be complete and in writing on forms provided by the Employer. 46 Requests may be submitted to Libraries or Law Human Resources. 47 C. The UWHR Compensation Office will investigate the position and issue a written 48 response to the employee or employee representative within sixty (60) calendar days 49 from receipt, by Human Resources, of the completed request. The response will include 50 notification of the class and salary assigned when the position is reallocated or 51 notification of the reasons the position does not warrant reallocation when the request is 52 not approved. 53 D. The effective date of allocations or reallocations initiated by the Employer shall be 54 determined by the Employer. The effective date of a reallocation resulting from an 55 employee representative request for position review will be established as the 1st or the 56 16th of the month which precedes the date that the completed request was filed with 57 Libraries or Law HR or the employee’s direct supervisor or department, whichever date 58 is earliest. The date of receipt must be appropriately documented.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Position Review Process. (a) The University, employee, or employee representative may request that a position be reviewed when the requesting party believes that the basis of its request has become a permanent requirement of the position. Employees and employee representatives may not request that a position be reviewed more often than once every six (6) months. (b) The request must be complete and in writing on forms provided by the University. Requests may be submitted to Human Resources or to an employee’s direct supervisor or department. Any party may submit additional information, including the names of individuals, which the party believes is relevant to the position review. (c) An employee may request that a representative be present as an observer at meetings with the University reviewer scheduled to discuss the request for position
View SourceView Similar (2)
Position Review Process. The University, employee, or employee representative may request that a position be 44 reviewed when the requesting party believes that the basis of its request has become 45 a permanent requirement of the position. Employees and employee representatives 46 may not request that a position be reviewed more often than once every six (6) months.
View Source
Position Review Process. (a) The University, employee, or employee representative may request that a position be 9 reviewed when the requesting party believes that the basis of its request has become 10 a permanent requirement of the position. Employees and employee representatives 11 may not request that a position be reviewed more often than once every six (6) 12 months. (b) The request must be complete and in writing on forms provided by the University. 15 Requests may be submitted to Human Resources or to an employee’s direct 16 supervisor or department. Any party may submit additional information, including the 17 names of individuals, which the party believes is relevant to the position review.
View Source
Position Review Process. (a) The University, employee, or employee representative may request that a position be reviewed when the requesting party believes that the basis of its request has become a permanent requirement of the position. Employees and employee representatives may not request that a position be reviewed more often than once every six (6) months. (b) The request must be complete and in writing on forms provided by the University. Requests may be submitted to Human Resources or to an employee’s direct supervisor or department. Any party may submit additional information, including the names of individuals, which the party believes is relevant to the position review. (c) An employee may request that a representative be present as an observer at meetings with the University reviewer scheduled to discuss the request for position review. At the employee's request a portion of such meetings shall be conducted in a quiet and private location, away from the work station. (d) The University reviewer will investigate the position and issue a written response to the employee or employee representative within sixty (60) calendar days from receipt, by Human Resources, of the completed request. A completed request is defined as the employee completing all employee portions of the reclassification forms. The response will include notification of the class and salary assigned when the position is reallocated, or notification of the reasons the position does not warrant reallocation when the request is not approved. Reclass requests may be submitted at either the departmental level or directly to Human Resources. Reclass requests submitted at the departmental level must be forwarded to Human Resources within thirty (30) calendar days.
View Source
Position Review Process. 55 A. The Employer or employee may request that a position be reviewed when the 56 requesting party believes that the basis of its request has become a permanent 57 requirement of the position. A position review requires a current performance 58 evaluation (completed within the previous twelve (12) months). Employees may 59 not request that a position be reviewed more often than once every six (6) 60 months. 61 B. The request must be complete and in writing on forms provided by the Employer. 62 C. The UWHR Compensation Office will investigate the position and issue a written 63 response within sixty (60) calendar days from receipt, by Human Resources, of 64 the completed request. The response will include notification of the class and 65 salary assigned when the position is reclassified, or notification of the reasons 66 the position does not warrant reclassification when the request is not approved. 67 D. The effective date of classifications or reclassifications initiated by the Employer 68 shall be determined by the Employer. #The effective date of a reclassification 69 resulting from an employee request for position review will be established as the 70 1stor the 16th of the month which precedes the date that the completed request 71 was filed with UWHR Compensation Office or the employee’s direct supervisor or 72 department, whichever date is earliest. The date of receipt must be appropriately 73 documented. 74 75 76 77 78 Tentatively Agreed To: For the Union: For the Employer: 4/10/2023 4/10/2023 4/10/2023 4/10/2023 4/10/2023 4/11/2023 4/10/2023 79 80 81 82 1
View Source

Related to Position Review Process

  • Position Review 18.3.1 Either an employee or the University may request an audit of the duties and responsibilities of a position he/she/it believes is not allocated to the proper class. Employees requesting such an audit are expected to notify the Union at the time of their request. 18.3.2 Job audits will be performed and reclassification decisions will be made by the University’s Human Resources Services staff according to the University’s Classification Process. The affected employee(s) and the Union will be notified of the outcome of a job audit in writing. In the event of a reallocation that results in removal of a position from the bargaining unit, the written notice will describe the manner in which the bargaining unit work is being distributed, including the classification and position(s) of any employee(s) absorbing work from the reallocated position. 18.3.3 If an employee disagrees with a classification decision made by the Human Resources staff, the employee may request review of that decision through the Director of OFM/State Human Resources within 30 (thirty) calendar days of receiving the final allocation decision from the University. Should the employee disagree with the Director’s decision, the employee may further appeal the matter to the Washington Personnel Resources Board within 30 (thirty) calendar days of being provided the written decision of the Director. The Board will render a decision, which will be final and binding. Decisions regarding appropriate classification will be reviewed in accordance with this Section and will not be subject to the grievance procedure specified in Article 40 of this Agreement.

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Transition Review Period In accordance with Article 35, Layoff and Recall, the Employer may require an employee to complete a transition review period.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.