Relevant Background Sample Clauses

Relevant Background. A. Acquisition and Ownership by the City of Nashua. 1. PWW is a regulated public utility that is wholly-owned by Penn Corp, which is, in turn, a corporation that is wholly-owned by the City of Nashua, New Hampshire (the “City”). The City acquired its ownership of Penn Corp on January 25, 2012, pursuant to the Acquisition Order. In addition to PWW, Penn Corp also owns two other water utilities: Pennichuck East Utility, Inc. (PEU) and Pittsfield Aqueduct Company, Inc. (PAC). 2. The Acquisition Order approved a settlement agreement among the parties to DW 11-026 (the “DW 11-026 Settlement Agreement”), subject to certain conditions. Among other things, the settling parties to the DW 11-026 Settlement Agreement recommended that the Commission approve the City’s acquisition of Penn Corp, approve a modified ratemaking structure for Penn Corp’s three water utilities (including PWW), approve the establishment of a $5,000,000 Rate Stabilization Fund (“RSF”) to be maintained by PWW, and approve certain accounting matters and limitations on dividends and distributions from the three utilities to Penn Corp. These special provisions were instituted in order to allow the three utilities to have “rates at levels that are sufficient to enable each utility to meet their operating requirements and to satisfy each utility’s apportioned share of responsibility to pay the debt service arising from the City Acquisition Bonds.”2 (See DW 11-026 Settlement Agreement at 8.)3
View SourceView Similar (3)
Relevant Background. The implementation of the current CBC Operational Programme will be jointly financed by external relations and cohesion funds from the new “European Territorial Cooperation” objective (previously INTERREG) within the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) matched by an equivalent allocation of IPA funds. The resulting single pot of money will have to be spent according to a single set of rules and on the basis of a common benefit approach which requires the involvement of joint programming and management structures. Thus IPA will promote enhanced cooperation and progressive economic integration and coherence between EU and candidate countries.
View Source
Relevant Background. [3] The Statement of Claim was filed on December 14, 2016. The parties have been engaged in settlement discussions and on August 29, 2019, they reached the framework of an agreement to settle this proceeding. The final terms of the Settlement Agreement are still being finalized. [4] The Settlement Agreement proposes the following definition as “Class Members”: All persons who are or who have been enrolled as CAF Members at any time from April 17, 1985, and for any duration up to and including the Approval Date, and who assert that they have been subjected to Racial Discrimination and/or Racial Harassment. [5] The proposed settlement includes individual compensation for class members (Monetary Assessment Scheme) as well as internal CAF measures (Systemic Relief Measures) designed to address and correct internal systemic issues. [6] Pursuant to Rules 334.34 and 334.37 of the Federal Court Rules, SOR/98-106 [Rules] the Court must approve the plan for disseminating notice to potential class members of the proposed settlement. The parties propose a notice program that includes Short Form Notice and a Long Form Notice [Notice Plan] to provide the necessary notice to the class members, including: (a) the terms of the proposed settlement of this proceeding; (b) the hearing dates for the Motion to certify the proceeding as a class proceeding, to determine if the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of the class, and, to approve Class Counsel fees [Settlement Approval Motion]; and (c) the July 16 and 17, 2024 hearing dates for the Settlement Approval Motion.
View Source
Relevant Background. Franklin Lakes and FSHC came to terms in an October 3, 2018 Settlement Agreement that set forth the Borough’s affordable Housing obligation and preliminary compliance plan. This Settlement Agreement and those with the intervenors were approved by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. Farrington, J.S.C. on January 9, 2019. The Borough adopted the Third Round Housing Element and Fair Share Plan on April 3, 2020. A Judgement of Compliance was received June 26, 2019.
View Source
Relevant Background. List the courses that are relevant to the proposed research that are in progress or that you have completed.
View Source
Relevant Background 
View Source

Related to Relevant Background

  • Project Background 6.1.1. Brief description of Contracting Agency’s project background and/or situation leading to this Project

  • BACKGROUND Purchaser wishes to purchase a Revenue Sharing Note issued by the Company through ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ (the “Site”).

  • Criminal Background Check It is the Responsibility of CHESAPEAKE CENTER, INC. to make certain that its employees, agents, volunteers, and contractors, who have contact with students receiving services are fingerprinted and have a background check in compliance with Family Law Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, and Section 5-551 through 5-557. CHESAPEAKE CENTER, INC. may not hire, contract, or otherwise engage an individual to participate in this Cooperative Agreement who has been convicted of a crime involving child abuse or neglect; contributing to the delinquency of a minor; a crime of violence as set forth in Criminal Law Article §14-101, Annotated Code of Maryland; or has evidence of a criminal history which in the opinion of Chesapeake Center, Inc. makes the individual unfit to participate in this Cooperative Agreement.

  • Criminal Background Checks Provider and College reserve the right to conduct criminal background checks on Resident to determine Resident’s suitability to live in Residence Facility, and Resident consents and agrees that Provider and College has permission to conduct criminal background checks on Resident.

  • Background Check The Department or Customer may require the Contractor to conduct background checks of its employees, agents, representatives, and subcontractors as directed by the Department or Customer. The cost of the background checks will be borne by the Contractor. The Department or Customer may require the Contractor to exclude the Contractor’s employees, agents, representatives, or subcontractors based on the background check results. In addition, the Contractor must ensure that all persons have a responsibility to self-report to the Contractor within three (3) calendar days any arrest for any disqualifying offense. The Contractor must notify the Contract Manager within twenty-four (24) hours of all details concerning any reported arrest. Upon the request of the Department or Customer, the Contractor will re-screen any of its employees, agents, representatives, and subcontractors during the term of the Contract.