Review Cycle Clause Samples

Review Cycle. The Committee shall identify an annual listing of jobs to be reviewed and will notify respective management and incumbents. Management will provide the Committee with documentation for each job under review indicating whether changes are required.
View SourceView Similar (7)
Review Cycle. At any time, but at least every third (3rd) year of employment, the designated supervisor (e.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Review Cycle. The PMO’s inspection, and Acceptance or Rejection, of the Contractor’s Deliverables shall require no longer than the number of Business Days from Date of Delivery specified as the Review Cycle for each Deliverable provided in Exhibit E, Schedule of Deliverables.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Review Cycle. This policy will be approved by School Council in March, 2021 and is scheduled for review in March, 2022. ANNEXURE A: ACCEPTABLE USE AGREEMENT Rationale Edgars Creek Primary School supports the belief that through Digital Technologies we equip students to participate in a rapidly changing world where work and leisure activities are increasingly transformed by technology. We enable students to find, explore, analyse, exchange and present information. We also focus on developing the skills necessary for students to be able to create and use information in a discriminating, effective and creative manner. Edgars Creek Primary School uses the Internet and digital technologies as teaching and learning tools. We see the Internet and digital technologies as valuable resources but acknowledge they must be used responsibly. Students will not be able to use devices at school prior to this agreement being signed. Your child has been asked to agree to use the Internet and devices responsibly at school. Parents/carers should be aware that the nature of the Internet is such that full protection from inappropriate content can never be guaranteed and some data will be housed on servers which are not located on school grounds, or within Victoria this also includes internet based services such as Google Docs. At Edgars Creek Primary School, we: • have a Cybersafe and responsible use program across the school. We reinforce the school code of conduct, values and behaviours when using technology and the internet • provide a filtered Internet service • provide supervision and direction in Internet activities and when using devices for learning • utilise devices for educational purposes e.g. Podcasts, photos from excursions • work towards setting tasks that ask your child open questions, so they can’t copy and paste all answers from the internet • provide support to parents to understand this agreement • provide support to parents through information evenings and a variety of related information • reserve the right to withdraw/limit the opportunity for the children to access online resources and devices • reserve the right to check student iPads to ensure all content is appropriate and aligns with agreed behaviours as outlined by this Acceptable Use Agreement • reserve the right to withdraw/limit the use of devices, including personal iPads due to the misuse, including but not limited to accessing inappropriate sites e.g. Facebook. BYOD iPad Program Our 1-1 BYOD iPad Program is f...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Review Cycle. The Assurance Group will review its progress informally at the end of each meeting and develop actions to address any issues that arise. The Assurance Group will review its membership and effectiveness annually as part of the review set out in the Commencement Date and Term section of the MoU.
View Source
Review Cycle. 2.8.1 The management plan states the period of validity of the plan, the date by when it should be reviewed and revised and the body responsible for arranging for review and revision.
View Source
Review Cycle. This agreement may be reviewed annually or at the request of either party.
View Source
Review Cycle. This policy was last updated in June 2018 and is scheduled for review within 2-3 years.
View Source
Review Cycle. ‌ This policy will be reviewed every two years or as needed. 2 Policy‌ This policy categorizes information into the following different Information Access Categories which set forth how information may be shared.
View Source

Related to Review Cycle

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Claims Review Report The IRO shall prepare a Claims Review Report as described in this Appendix for each Claims Review performed. The following information shall be included in the Claims Review Report for each Discovery Sample and Full Sample (if applicable).

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.