Review and Revision Clause Samples
The Review and Revision clause establishes a process for periodically evaluating and updating the terms of an agreement. Typically, it outlines how and when parties can propose changes, the procedures for discussing amendments, and the method for formalizing any agreed-upon modifications. This clause ensures that the contract remains relevant and adaptable to changing circumstances, helping to prevent disputes by providing a clear mechanism for making necessary adjustments.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 3 times
Review and Revision. OCR will review the materials submitted by the District above and notify the District if the District has not met the criteria outlined in Section I. In this case, OCR will provide feedback and guidance to the District to assist the District in satisfactorily completing the tasks.
Review and Revision. A. This Spending Policy will be reviewed and reconfirmed or revised on a regular basis by the Foundation’s Board of Trustees.
Review and Revision. This agreement will remain in effect unless notice of intent to terminate is provided to the other party in writing at least thirty days prior to the intended termination date. All requests for revisions to the contract must be made in writing and submitted to the other party for review. No revisions, amendments or modifications of this Agreement, or any part thereof shall be valid unless made in writing and agreed upon by both parties, as evidenced by their respective signatures.
Review and Revision. This clause will be reviewed annually within the life of this agreement or as necessary to ensure its effectiveness and relevance. Any revisions will be agreed with all Crematorium staff.
Review and Revision. Plan for a mid-term evaluation (typically at the 5-year mark for a 10-year Plan). Note that if an AEWA International Species Action Plan exists there are reporting requirements under the Agreement on progress made with respect to their implementation (i.e. the Report on the Implementation of AEWA Species Action Plans which is submitted to the AEWA MOP every six years, the triennial AEWA National Reports as well as the National Reports submitted under the Plan of Action for Africa). If, in addition, the implementation of such an International Plan is being coordinated by an AEWA International Species Working Group, reporting requirements on annual basis or to every meeting of the Working Group may also exist. In this case, it will be pertinent to schedule implementation stock- taking exercises of national Species Action Plans so that this information can feed into these wider international evaluations. As the Action Plan nears the end of its 10-year term a more extensive evaluation report should be produced against the indicators set out therein. This may lead to a decision to revise, extend or retire the National Species Action Plan. The decision-making flowchart below in Box 6 has been devised and adopted by the AEWA Technical Committee to visualise the thought process when it comes to deciding whether International Species Action Plans adopted under the AEWA should be recommended for revision, extension or retirement at the end of their tenures. This flow-chart can also support such discussions on national level. Species Action Plans which have served their purpose (i.e. their objectives have been achieved and the species in question has been returned to a favourable conservation status) should be formally retired.
Review and Revision a. This agreement may be reviewed at the conclusion of the Initial Term and subsequently not less than biennially by the Copyright Holders.
b. Changes to this agreement must be approved by all Copyright Holders.
c. This Agreement shall be interpreted under the laws of the United States of America and the State of Illinois. Any dispute between the parties to this Agreement on its interpretation shall be referred to an arbitrator appointed by the Institute of Arbitrators, London. By: Associate Executive Director, ALA Publishing & Media By: Its: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Chair of CFLA Date: 11/21/2022 By: Its: ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, Head of Publishing, Facet Publishing, CILIP Date: 11/08/2022
Review and Revision. This will involve review and revisions of evaluation work and assistance in responding to client review comments and concerns. Task 1 No deliverables 45 calendar days from Notice to Proceed Task 2 Draft Economic and Natural Resources Economic Benefit Analysis report 90 calendar days from Notice to Proceed Final Economic and Natural Resources Economic Benefit Analysis report 14 calendar days from receipt of GLO comments on the draft report
1. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Engineering shall submit all reports to the GLO Project Manager, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, GLO Coastal Resources, at ▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.
2. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Engineering shall submit one (1) electronic copy of the draft report and monthly progress reports in PDF format.
3. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Engineering shall submit one (1) electronic copy in PDF format.
4. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Engineering and the GLO agree that this schedule may change as the Project progresses, and any revisions thereto shall be made in writing and executed by both parties. Burdened Senior Advisor/QC/Editor 247.00 Program Manager 199.00 Senior Professional 170.00 Project Professional 140.00 Staff Professional 108.00 Sr. CAD/GIS 153.00 Project CAD/GIS 121.00 Staff CAD/GIS 79.00 Admin/Document Prep 77.00 Intern 66.00 REQUIRED INSURANCE
Review and Revision. This SLA will be reviewed annually or as needed to reflect changes in service delivery capabilities and customer requirements. Any amendments to this SLA will be communicated to customers with at least 30 days' notice.
Review and Revision. 6.01 The County shall be entitled to an administrative review conducted pursuant to the procedures stated in this subsection that are in effect for this Contract if both of the following occur: • The Department and the County disagree about the interpretation of any provision of this Contract; and • The disagreement concerns one of the following: o Reconciliation of claims and reimbursements; review is through departmental conference; o Any audit of the County as described in this Contract; review is through the audit resolution policy; o Any audit resolution process; review is through the audit resolution policy; or o Any federal audit of the County or the Department; review is through the Divisions Numbered Memos on federal audits.
6.02 If the Department and the County disagree about the interpretation of any provision of this Contract other than the disagreements described in section 6.01 of this Contract, and the County believes it is or will be injured by an action of the Department, the County shall be entitled to a hearing before the Department of Administration – Division of Hearings and Appeals, which must be requested within sixty (60) calendar days from the day the action in question occurred. The following procedures shall apply: • The Department shall cooperate with the Department of Administration – Division of Hearings and Appeals to have a hearing scheduled within sixty (60) calendar days of receipt of the appeal request; • Both the County and the Department shall be entitled to one thirty (30) calendar-day continuance of the hearing upon written notification to the other party and to the Division of Hearings and Appeals; • The hearing shall be conducted as if it were a Class 3 case hearing under Wis. Stat. ch. 227. At the hearing, the parties may present evidence, call and cross-examine witnesses, and make arguments on the issues; and • Either party may ask the Secretary of the Department to review the proposed decision within thirty
Review and Revision. This policy, and all related appendices, will be reviewed as it is deemed appropriate.