Scenario Clause Samples

Scenario. To provide a straightforward evaluation, the selected evalu- ation scenario describes the application of the approach using the response time metric, which is a QoS-related (e.g., latency, throughput, and packet loss) SLA. The metrics in QoS- related SLAs are quantitative, being able to be automatically verified in the SC. Nevertheless, the designed approach can be modified to fit different types of SLAs, such as service availability. The evaluation scenario was composed of a web server and a client performing periodic requests. A Raspberry Pi model B with a quad-core ARM Cortex-A7 CPU @ 900 MHz, 1 GB of RAM, and a 150 Mbps Wi-Fi dongle hosted an Apache web server, and a Lenovo ThinkPad T430 with a quad-core Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90 GHz, 16 GB of RAM, and a 1 Gbps Ethernet connection performed the requests as the client. The client requested at every 1 s a PHP page that performed random calculations to introduce load in the server. Moreover, after each finished request, the client retrieved the response time of the request and stored this value in a Comma- Separated-Value (CSV) file. During a 30 minutes interval, 1800 requests were performed and measured (30 min 60 s = 1800); the response times of these requests are depicted in Figure 2. It can be seen in the graph that the majority of the requests were answered in 0.2 s to 0.3 s, and that there are requests with response times over 0.6 s. The average response time for the period was 0.2445 s. Based on these values, the violation threshold was fixed to 0.3 s, which is depicted using a red dashed line in the graph. 0.9 0.8 Response Time (seconds) 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Response Time Violation Threshold Fig. 2: Response Time between the Client and the Web Server Listing 6: Compensate and Deposit Functions

Scenario. Start a UI and its associated activity. This is another pattern for starting a unit of work (which involves launching a user interface). In this case, a user would launch a user interface, which would then “attach” itself to an activity. The activity that the user interface “attaches” itself to can be a new activity that the user interface would startup or a currently “running” activity that the UI would invoke operations on. open() startup()

Scenario. 2 applies to employees who are appointed to a role to which this clause 46applies but who act in a position not covered by this Agreement (that is, a senior contract position). Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Salary Paid the salary for the position as described in Appendix 1C for the period of acting *Greater of: • the minimum remuneration for the senior contract position; or • a higher grade rate set by their General Manager /managers where applicable; or • their current rate Leave Any form of leave during the first 13 weeks of the acting higher grade, the period of leave will not attract the higher rate of payment. Any form of leave during the first 13 weeks of the acting higher grade, the period of leave will not attract the higher rate of payment. Conditions Shall work in accordance with the conditions of this clause 46 while acting Shall work in accordance with the conditions of this clause while acting Employees who are not appointed to a role to which this clause 46 applies but who act in a position under this clause 46 are not entitled to either: • Take; or • Accrue rostered day off during the period of acting

Scenario. The Participant has agreed to load shift of 1MW per Event at a price of $27,000 per MW (Bid Rate). There is a total of 26 Events for the Term. The Participant achieved 100% of its Flexibility Target for each Event. The maximum fees payable by Western Power to the Participant for the Term will be calculated as follows: 1MW x $27,000 = $27,000 Of that amount the Availability Incentive and Performance Incentive are: Availability Incentive = $27,000 x 20% = $5,400 Performance Incentive = $27,000 x 80% = $21,600 Fee Payable: $21,600 + $5,400 = $27,000 The maximum fees payable by Western Power to the Participant for an Event will be calculated as follows: $27,000 ( ) = $1,038.46 26 Of that amount the Availability Incentive and Performance Incentive are: Availability Incentive = $1,038.46 x 20% = $207.69 Performance Incentive = $1,038.46 x 80% = $830.77 Fee Payable: $207.69 + $830.77 = $1,038.46 The maximum fees payable by Western Power to the Participant for a Month if there were three (3) Events in that Month will be calculated as follows: Fee Payable: $1,038.46 x 3 = $3,115.38

Scenario. Registering a consumer and supplier to receive and supply anEvent using the PUSH method.

Scenario. You hear that a fellow community health volunteer has suddenly died. They day before he had said he was not feeling well but otherwise had been in good health. Is this an event? Yes Why is this unusual event? Unexpected death of a community health volunteer with no clear cause What is the next step? Immediately report the death to the national EOC hotline number. Inform them when the death occurred, when he first began to fall ill, where the death occurred, and any other relevant information. Be sure to give your personal contact information in case responding authority need additional information

Scenario. Cooperating organizations (companies, government agencies) exchange data frequently. This is particularly so in case of a joint task force between two companies (which is joined by employees from both partners, typically on a temporary bases while the task force is established on a medium range). A good example may be a consulting company which is on a mid-range contract to collaborate with the software department of a large corporation, in defining, pursuing, and completing a large software project. Even if the task force is residing at the location of one partner data access is necessary to data located at the other site, during the software development process. This involves quite a few complications, beyond the access control problems in one organization. In this subsection we briefly describe an application scenario of a cooperation between two organizations. We are dealing with a cooperation (“Fu-Company”) which hired an IT-Consulting Company (“Consult”) to support their development department in a particular project. In this scenario we will focus on the role functionality of these organizations, due to the page limitations. The role hierarchies of the two cooperating organizations are shown in figure 1. We assume that the cooperation is not limited to the exchange of some data files between the organizations. Instead the staff involved in the cooperation should access the data according to their assigned roles in that cooperation. Each organization assigns roles to their staff according to its role hierarchy. The following example illustrates that a one-to-one relationship between the roles is not always suitable for a cooperation. In the software-department of the “Fu-Company” a dedicated role “Tester” is responsible for testing and the verification of the test is done by a different user which is assigned the role “Tester” as well. On the other hand in the consulting company it is the job of “Junior Consultant” to code all the tests. The verification is done by the “Consultant”. If a “Consultant” is developing tests, these will be verified by a “Senior Consultant”' in the same company.

Scenario the Scenario to be written by the Writer pursuant to this agreement, based on the annexed Synopsis and suitable for being adapted for a feature film of approx. [@@@] minutes, as well as any part of the Scenario if the Scenario has only been partially produced at any time; the Scenario is also understood to mean any version of the written and/or to be written Scenario, as well as all additions, changes and improvements, including any after the completion, that are implemented at a later stage. Finally, the Scenario is also understood to mean the Synopsis as written by the Writer, as well as the treatment yet to be written, if applicable.

Scenario. Gaming-based simulation and policy modelling" 4.1.9 Scenario 9: Natural Language Processing in tourism Figure 12. Scenario "Natural Language Processing in tourism"