Scope of Projects Sample Clauses
The "Scope of Projects" clause defines the specific work, deliverables, and responsibilities that are included within a contract or agreement. It typically outlines the boundaries of what is to be performed, such as the types of services provided, project phases, timelines, and any exclusions or limitations. For example, it may specify that only certain tasks or locations are covered, or that additional work requires a separate agreement. This clause is essential for ensuring both parties have a clear, mutual understanding of what is expected, thereby minimizing disputes and preventing scope creep during the course of the project.
Scope of Projects. As Co-Interim City Manager, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ agrees to faithfully execute the general duties laid forth in the City Charter. The scope of work that Co-Interim City Manager(s) shall undertake is attached under “Co-Interim City Manager Transition Plan”. As Co-Interim City Manager, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall have sole authority to make decisions within the areas of responsibility and scope of work assigned to him under the Transition Plan.
Scope of Projects. The scope of work of the Projects and the Parkway South Project shall be as set forth in the definition of each of those projects in Section 1 of this Agreement and shall comply with the Interchange Justification Report. A material change in the scope of the Exit #3 Proper Project shall require the approval of the Bank Board, SCDOT and Project Sponsors and be stated in an amendment to this Agreement. For purposes of this Section 5.2, “material change” means a change in the scope of the Exit #3 Proper Project: (a) that requires a revision of the Record of Decision or other approvals issued by Federal Highway Administration for the Exit #3 Proper Project, the permit(s) issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the Exit #3 Proper Project, or the permits, approvals or authorizations required for the Exit #3 Proper Project issued by other Federal or state agencies, including the Interchange Justification Report, but only if such changes alter the overall design or purpose of the Exit #3 Proper Project; (b) that does not comply with SCDOT’s standards, specifications and requirements or the Interchange Justification Report; or (c) that materially changes the overall design or scope of the Exit #3 Proper Project, which alone or together with other material changes as defined in Section 5.2, increases the costs of the Exit #3 Proper Project beyond the estimated costs of $86,200,000 set forth in Section 3.1 of this Agreement or the higher cost of the Exit #3 Proper Project established by the process in Section 5.1 of this Agreement, whichever is applicable. Except as provided above in (a), (b), and (c) of this Section 5.2, change orders may be executed by SCDOT for items necessary to complete the Exit #3 Proper Project without the consent of the Project Sponsors or Bank. Notwithstanding the above provisions in Section 5.2, no consent from the Project Sponsors relating to increased costs for the Exit #3 Proper Project is required to implement or enforce the obligation of the Project Sponsors to pay for Cost Overruns for the Exit #3 Project as set forth in this Agreement so long as the Cost Overrun is not caused by one or more of the material changes set forth in (a), (b), or (c) above in this Section 5.2. The Bank acknowledges that the Project Sponsors and the Owner may negotiate among themselves an alternative basis for the sharing of the Cost Overrun obligations in the Participation Agreement, the Development Agreement or both such documents, but this shall no...
Scope of Projects. The Sponsoring Council will define the purpose and scope of each quality improvement project.
Scope of Projects. 19 a) HACR will define the full project scope within a HACR work order to be 20 delivered to CONTRACTOR.
21 b) CONTRACTOR agrees to not work beyond the boundaries of the project scope 22 identified within the HACR work order.
23 c) HACR will not be obligated to pay or reimburse any costs incurred by 24 CONTRACTOR for work outside the project scope as identified in the HACR 25 work order.
Scope of Projects. 26 5.3.1 Utah Navajo Water Supply System. Documents entitled “Draft San ▇▇▇▇ – 27 Mexican Hat to Kayenta Regional Water Supply Study” (June 2014), and “Draft San ▇▇▇▇ 28 – Mexican Hat to Kayenta Regional Water Supply Report” (March 2015) prepared by 29 Reclamation; “Navajo Utah Chapters Regional Water Plans and Analysis of the Existing 1 Public Water System Upgrade Project” (Phase 1: Hydraulic Engineering Analysis and 2 Capital Improvements Plan (May 2010); Phase 2: Utah Chapters Water Plan (August 3 2010)), prepared by ▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇; and the “Navajo Nation/State of Utah Water 5 Department of Water Resources, describe the water supply needs of the Reservation and 6 propose a range of alternatives for addressing those needs. Regional systems providing 7 water supply trunk lines were determined to be the most cost effective means for meeting 8 water demands. However, the Parties acknowledge that there are a number of variables 9 that are subject to change in the future with the potential to affect the determination of 10 which water delivery alternative is most cost effective. The final design of the Utah
Scope of Projects