Section 9--Evaluation Sample Clauses

Section 9—Evaluation establishes the procedures and criteria for assessing the performance or quality of goods, services, or deliverables under the agreement. Typically, this clause outlines who is responsible for conducting the evaluation, the standards or benchmarks to be used, and the timeframe within which the evaluation must occur. Its core function is to ensure that both parties have a clear, agreed-upon process for determining whether contractual obligations have been met, thereby reducing disputes and promoting accountability.
Section 9--Evaluation. A written evaluation shall be presented to the unit member thirty (30) days prior to the last day of school. The unit member shall attend an evaluation conference prior to the last two (2) weeks of school. Two (2) school days prior to the evaluation conference, the unit member shall receive a copy of the evaluation. The unit member shall sign the evaluation form signifying that he/she has read the evaluation and shall be provided the opportunity to prepare a written response. The written response, if any, shall become a part of the unit member’s evaluation.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Section 9--Evaluation. 1. All classroom teachers in each building will be evaluated pursuant to the state four-level evaluation requirements and the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ instructional framework. All provisional teachers and any continuing contract classroom teachers who do not have four years of satisfactory evaluations shall be evaluated on the comprehensive evaluation format. Eligible classroom teachers will receive a focused evaluation as allowed by the law. 2. The comprehensive and focused evaluations referenced above shall be conducted in accordance with the statutory requirements in RCW 28A.405.100. For purposes of this new evaluation system, the parties have agreed to adopt the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Teacher Evaluation Model as approved by OSPI. 3. All evaluators and the classroom teachers shall receive comprehensive training in all eight criteria in the new evaluation system. The training for evaluators shall include professional development designed to maximize rater agreement. 4. The term “classroom teacher” used in this section means a certificated employee who provides academically focused instruction to students and holds one or more of the certificates pursuant to WAC 181-79A-140 (1) through (3) and (6)(a) through (e) and (g). 5. A conference will be held prior to each formal observation. These conferences shall be conducted not more than ten (10) days prior to the observation. Two (2) days minimum notice shall be given before a pre-conference. Twenty-four (24) hour notice shall be given before an in-classroom formal observation. A post conference will be held no more than ten (10) days after the formal classroom observation. 6. The judgments reflected in employee evaluations and observation documents will be based on the professional performance of the employee as cited in the current evaluation system and not the standardized test or performance assessment scores of the students taught by that employee, except to the extent those scores are included in the employee’s required student growth impact rating. 7. The evaluation procedure set forth herein shall provide for a positive, growth-minded process to be maintained by the District, Association and employees toward the development and improvement of the instructional program of the District. The evaluation procedure shall recognize various levels of performance and encourage improvement in specific, identifiable areas. The purpose of this evaluation procedure is to improve the instructional program being offered by the District, as well as...
View Source
Section 9--Evaluation. The District will adopt the provisions of Senate Bill 6696 and comply with the law in 2013.
View Source

Related to Section 9--Evaluation

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.