Summary of Test Program Sample Clauses

The 'Summary of Test Program' clause outlines the key objectives, scope, and procedures of a testing initiative within an agreement. It typically details what will be tested, the methods to be used, and the expected outcomes or deliverables, providing a clear roadmap for both parties. By summarizing the test program, this clause ensures mutual understanding of the testing process and helps prevent misunderstandings or disputes regarding expectations and responsibilities.
Summary of Test Program. Pursuant to the Contract with Purchaser to provide Multiple Hearth Furnaces for Purchaser’s activated carbon facility, Seller will oversee a test program to measure and verify performance of the four (4) new MHFs to be provided under separate Multi-Hearth Furnace Contracts. The purpose of this test program is to demonstrate the MHFs (individually and collectively) meet or exceed all of the mutually-agreed guarantee values established in the Multi-Hearth Furnace Contracts, quantify the product capacity of the MHFs, validate the quality of the MHF product, validate auxiliary power consumption, confirm total heat content of the offgas, and verify the controlled emissions of total suspended particulate (TSP), nitrogen compounds and sulfur compounds. This test program is required only for the purpose of the Multi-Hearth Furnace Contracts, and may or may not be part of any regulatory requirement or submission. The results of the testing program will provide information to confirm performance of the Equipment supplied as part of the Multi-Hearth Furnace Contracts. This information will provide a basis for achievement of Substantial Completion. The emission tests will be carried out in accordance with this document with input and assistance from Seller, Purchaser, the EPC Contractor, and the Independent Testing Company. Rigid sampling rules, testing requirements, and chain-of-custody requirements may be waived by Purchaser at the recommendation of the Independent Testing Company. Seller will be responsible for coordinating the testing with Purchaser’s operators, the EPC Contractor, and the Independent Testing Company. Purchaser’s Plant operators will be responsible for collecting all field samples. Seller and EPC Contractor will coordinate their efforts to produce the information to be gathered from the Project DCS system. An Independent Testing Company will be responsible for collecting all gas and particulate emission samples and for obtaining all laboratory analyses of all samples, including, without limitation, feed material, product material and cyclone ash.
View SourceView Similar (8)

Related to Summary of Test Program

  • Performance Testing (a) All performance tests of the Project, including any Initial Performance Test required in Section 2 of Appendix VIII, will be performed in accordance with the test procedures set forth in Appendix VIII (“Performance Test”), including additional procedures and protocols related to Performance Testing as mutually agreed between Buyer and Seller (“Test Procedures”). Seller shall bear all costs and receive all revenues, if applicable, associated with all Performance Tests. (b) After the Initial Delivery Date and during the Delivery Term, Buyer will have the right to conduct a Performance Test (“Buyer Performance Test”) no more than once a calendar year to demonstrate whether the Project is capable of delivering the Distribution Services at the Contract Capacity. Within 30 calendar days following a Buyer Performance Test, Seller will have the right to retest the Project with a Performance Test (“Seller Retest”). For the avoidance of doubt, the results of any Seller Retest will supersede the results of the preceding Buyer Performance Test. (i) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at or above ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, the Contract Capacity will remain the Initial Contract Capacity; (ii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at more than or equal to eighty-five (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, but less than ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity (“Testing Band”), the Contract Capacity will be automatically adjusted (upwards or downwards) to the capacity commensurate with the amount of Distribution Services the Project delivered during the Performance Test within the Testing Band. (iii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is not capable of delivering Distribution Services of at least eighty-five percent (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, an Event of Default shall occur in accordance with Section 7.1(a)(viii).

  • Program Management 1.1.01 Implement and operate an Immunization Program as a Responsible Entity 1.1.02 Identify at least one individual to act as the program contact in the following areas: 1. Immunization Program Manager;

  • Performance Tests Contractor shall perform Performance Tests in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Agreement and Attachment S.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5.1 The Employee agrees to participate in the performance management system that the Employer adopted for the employees of the Employer; 5.2 The Employee accepts that the purpose of the performance management system will be to provide a comprehensive system with specific performance standards to assist the employees and service providers to perform to the standards required; 5.3 The Employer must consult the Employee about the specific performance standards and targets that will be included in the performance management system applicable to the Employee; 5.4 The Employee undertakes to actively focus on the promotion and implementation of the key performance indicators (including special projects relevant to the employee’s responsibilities) within the local government framework; 5.5 The criteria upon which the performance of the Employee shall be assessed shall consist of two components, Operational Performance and Competencies both of which shall be contained in the Performance Agreement; 5.6 The Employee’s assessment will be based on his performance in terms of the outputs/outcomes (performance indicators) identified as per attached Performance Plan, which are linked to the KPAs, and will constitute 80% of the overall assessment result as per the weightings agreed to between the Employer and Employee; 5.7 The Competencies will make up the other 20% of the Employee’s assessment score. The Competencies are spilt into two groups, leading competencies (indicated in blue on the graph below) that drive strategic intent and direction and core competencies (indicated in green on the graph below), which drive the execution of the leading competencies. Strategic direc on and leadership People management Program and project management Financial management Change leadership Governance leadersip Moral competence Planning and organising Analysis and innova on Knowledge and informa on management Communica on Results and quality focus