Supplementary Notes Sample Clauses

Supplementary Notes. Abstract This project developed a roadmap for future model enhancements of the Florida Statewide Model (FLSWM) in light of emerging planning issues and proposed enhancement strategies incorporating advanced demand modeling techniques. The roadmap was developed with accomplishment of three tasks: literature review, model evaluation with scenario analysis, and identification of improvement needs. The roadmap encompasses improvement tasks grouped into short-term, mid/long-term, and long- term stages. In the short-term, the trip-based approach of existing FLSWM is maintained. Modifications should focus on the most urgent needs, including time-of-day factoring that split daily trip tables into multiple periods which enables traffic assignment of peak periods. Additional modification could consider expanding the capacity of the cross-classification model for trip generation by including additional stratifications such as area type or household income. In the mid/long-term, a transition to an activity-based model can be staged given resources available. Through a population synthesizer, which simulates a population with detailed characteristics based on U.S. Census data, a variety of variables can be included in the subsequent choice models. A mobility choice component would be needed to address the adoption of vehicle technologies and mobility services, which would be critical in the era of autonomous, connected, electric shared vehicles (ACES). In addition, dynamic traffic assignment or traffic microsimulation can produce hour-by-hour traffic volumes that can effectively facilitate evaluation of efficiency-oriented policies and technologies. Longer-term enhancement may consider location choices for home, work and school and reflect the connection between transportation accessibility and land use. An additional mobility choice component, such as telecommuting adoption, can also be beneficial and reflect potential trend in telecommunications and the impacts on travel demand.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Supplementary Notes. ABSTRACT A three-round algorithm is presented that guarantees agreement in a system of K = 3F+1 nodes provided each faulty node induces no more than F faults and each good node experiences no more than F faults, where, F is the maximum number of simultaneous faults in the network. The algorithm is based on the Oral Message algorithm of Lamport et al. and is scalable with respect to the number of nodes in the system and applies equally to the traditional node-fault model as well as the link-fault model. We also present a mechanical verification of the algorithm focusing on verifying the correctness of a bounded model of the algorithm as well as confirming claims of determinism.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Supplementary Notes. Enter information not included elsewhere such as: prepared in cooperation with; translation of; report supersedes; old edition number, etc.
View Source
Supplementary Notes. 7: Remove sentence: “This may be the next day, or even next week, if orals are held in conjunction with the OCQ” The terms of reference were acceptable as written. No changes can be made to the OCQ by‐laws before the adoption of the new Chemists Law – however, the process(es) agreed upon by the CACB and the OCQ will be incorporated in standard operating processes to ensure continuity and alignment of the agreement.
View Source
Supplementary Notes. Abstract This report provides an analytical framework for evaluating the Seattle/Lake Washington Corridor (LWC) Urban Partnership Agreement (UPA) under the United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) UPA Program. The Seattle/LWC UPA projects focus on reducing congestion by employing strategies consisting of combinations of tolling, transit, telecommuting/travel demand management, and technology, also known as the 4 Ts. The Seattle/LWC national evaluation plan identifies the major questions to be answered through the evaluation, the evaluation analyses to be used to address those questions, and the data needed for the analyses. It also outlines the test plans that will be used to collect and analyze the required data. The Seattle/LWC UPA national evaluation is based on the National Evaluation Framework prepared for the U.S. DOT. Four objective questions posed by U.S. DOT serve as a starting point for the national and Seattle/LWC evaluation plan. These questions are how much congestion was reduced; what contributed to the reduction and what were the associated impacts; what lessons were learned about non-technical factors for success; and what were the overall cost and benefit of the congestion reduction strategies. The four objective questions were translated into twelve evaluation analyses, which in turn consist of hypotheses and questions, measures of effectiveness (▇▇▇▇), and data required for the ▇▇▇▇. This document presents the plan for evaluating the Seattle/LWC UPA projects.
View Source
Supplementary Notes. ABSTRACT This thesis researches how the U.S. and Vietnamese Governments have cooperated to deal with the consequences of Agent Orange in Vietnam. Between 1962 and 1971 during the Vietnam War, the U.S. military conducted Operation Ranch Hand to spray around 19 million gallons of herbicides, of which over 11 million was Agent Orange, over South Vietnam. As many as four million Vietnamese people have exposed to Agent Orange. The toxic chemical has also effected the local environment and ecology so far. Decades after the war, Agent ▇▇▇▇▇▇ has still remained among the most sensitive issues between the U.S. and Vietnam, which has also continued to impact the bilateral relations. Since 2000, the U.S. and Vietnamese Government have made joint efforts to address this issue. Their cooperative work has spread out from statements by their leaders to scientific discussions and joint research to dioxin remediation programs and healthcare activities to Vietnamese Agent Orange victims. These efforts have led to a common focus, allowing the progress to date and creating momentum to the progress in the future, considerably contributing to strengthening the U.S.-Vietnam comprehensive partnership relationship.
View Source
Supplementary Notes. Abstract The performance of a microwave radar system for vehicle detection at a railroad grade crossing in Hinsdale, Illinois, was evaluated through field-testing in favorable (normal, good) weather conditions. The system was installed at a crossing with three tracks and used two radar units aimed at the crossing from opposite quadrants. The performance was assessed in terms of false calls, missed calls, stuck-on calls, and dropped calls, using datasets collected in favorable (good) weather conditions. First, the system performance was assessed using the initial setup. In the initial setup, the most frequent error type was false calls (0.55%), mainly the result of activations caused by pedestrians and bicyclists in the crossing; followed by missed calls caused by one of the radars missing a vehicle (0.07%). These results were shared with the product developer to see whether he wanted to make any modification to the initial setup. In the modified setup, the detection zones and the aim of one of the radars were changed. Then, the system performance was evaluated. Results for the modified setup showed an increased frequency of false calls (0.96%), mostly the result of activations generated by moving gates and also by pedestrians. Missed calls in the modified setup were slightly increased to 0.09%, and they were due to one of the two radar units missing a vehicle. There were no missed calls when the system relied on the two radar units because at least one of the two always detected the vehicles occupying the crossing. The system did not generate any stuck-on or dropped calls in the selected data for both the initial and the modified setup in favorable (good) weather conditions. Additional testing is under way to evaluate the system in adverse weather conditions, including snow-covered roadways, rain, fog, and wind.
View Source
Supplementary Notes. Abstract This report provides an analytic framework for evaluating the San ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Partnership Agreement (UPA) under the United States Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) UPA Program. The San Francisco UPA projects to be evaluated focus on those related to variable parking pricing. Those projects include variable pricing of on-street and off-street parking in the City of San Francisco, enhancements to 511 to include parking information, an integrated payment system for parking and transit, and expansion of telecommuting/TDM outreach activities to support the other projects. The San Francisco UPA national evaluation plan identifies major questions to be answered through the evaluation, the evaluation analyses to be used to address those questions, and the data needed for the analyses. It also outlines the test plans that will be used to collect and analyze the required data. The evaluation plan is based on the National Evaluation Framework (NEF) prepared for the U.S. DOT. Four objective questions that were posed by U.S. DOT serve as a starting point for the NEF and San Francisco evaluation plan. These questions are how much congestion was reduced; what contributed to the reduction and what were the associated impacts; what lessons were learned about non-technical factors for success; and what were the overall cost and benefit of the congestion reduction strategies. The four objective questions were translated into twelve evaluation analyses, which in turn consist of hypotheses and questions, measures of effectiveness (▇▇▇▇), and data required for the ▇▇▇▇. This document presents the plan for evaluating the San Francisco UPA projects.
View Source

Related to Supplementary Notes

  • Temporary Notes Pending the preparation of Definitive Notes, the Issuer may execute, and upon receipt of an Issuer Order the Indenture Trustee shall authenticate and deliver, temporary Notes that are printed, lithographed, typewritten, mimeographed or otherwise produced, of the tenor of the Definitive Notes in lieu of which they are issued and with such variations not inconsistent with the terms of this Indenture as the officers executing such Notes may determine, as evidenced by their execution of such Notes. If temporary Notes are issued, the Issuer will cause Definitive Notes to be prepared without unreasonable delay. After the preparation of Definitive Notes, the temporary Notes shall be exchangeable for Definitive Notes upon surrender of the temporary Notes at the office or agency of the Issuer to be maintained as provided in Section 3.02, without charge to the Holder. Upon surrender for cancellation of any one or more temporary Notes, the Issuer shall execute, and the Indenture Trustee shall authenticate and deliver in exchange therefor, a like principal amount of Definitive Notes of authorized denominations. Until so exchanged, the temporary Notes shall in all respects be entitled to the same benefits under this Indenture as Definitive Notes.

  • General Notes The following General Notes apply without exception to this Agreement, including to Annexes 1 through 6.

  • Senior Notes In order to secure and provide for the repayment and payment of the ABRCF Obligations with respect to the Series 2023-3 Senior Notes, ABRCF hereby grants a security interest in and assigns, pledges, grants, transfers and sets over to the Trustee, for the benefit of the Series 2023-3 Noteholders, all of ABRCF’s right, title and interest in and to the following (whether now or hereafter existing or acquired): (i) the Class A/B/C Reserve Account, including any security entitlement thereto; (ii) all funds on deposit therein from time to time; (iii) all certificates and instruments, if any, representing or evidencing any or all of the Class A/B/C Reserve Account or the funds on deposit therein from time to time; (iv) all investments made at any time and from time to time with monies in the Class A/B/C Reserve Account, whether constituting securities, instruments, general intangibles, investment property, financial assets or other property; (v) all interest, dividends, cash, instruments and other property from time to time received, receivable or otherwise distributed in respect of or in exchange for the Class A/B/C Reserve Account, the funds on deposit therein from time to time or the investments made with such funds; and (vi) all proceeds of any and all of the foregoing, including, without limitation, cash (the items in the foregoing clauses (i) through (vi) are referred to, collectively, as the “Class A/B/C Reserve Account Collateral”). The Trustee shall possess all right, title and interest in and to all funds on deposit from time to time in the Class A/B/C Reserve Account and in all proceeds thereof, and shall be the only person authorized to originate entitlement orders in respect of the Class A/B/C Reserve Account. The Class A/B/C Reserve Account Collateral shall be under the sole dominion and control of the Trustee for the benefit of the Series 2023-3 Noteholders. The Series 2023-3 Agent hereby agrees (i) to act as the securities intermediary (as defined in Section 8-102(a)(14) of the New York UCC) with respect to the Class A/B/C Reserve Account; (ii) that its jurisdiction as securities intermediary is New York; (iii) that each item of property (whether investment property, financial asset, security, instrument or cash) credited to the Class A/B/C Reserve Account shall be treated as a financial asset (as defined in Section 8-102(a)(9) of the New York UCC) and (iv) to comply with any entitlement order (as defined in Section 8-102(a)(8) of the New York UCC) issued by the Trustee.

  • Treasury Notes In determining whether the Holders of the required principal amount of Notes have concurred in any direction, waiver or consent, Notes owned by the Company, or by any Person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by or under direct or indirect common control with the Company, shall be considered as though not outstanding, except that for the purposes of determining whether the Trustee shall be protected in relying on any such direction, waiver or consent, only Notes that the Trustee knows are so owned shall be so disregarded.

  • Book-Entry Notes Except as provided in Section 2.13, the Notes, upon original issuance, will be issued in the form of typewritten, printed, lithographed or engraved or produced by any combination of these methods (with or without steel engraved borders) Notes representing the Book-Entry Notes, to be delivered to (or held by the Indenture Trustee on behalf of) The Depository Trust Company, the initial Clearing Agency, by, or on behalf of, the Issuing Entity. The Book-Entry Notes shall be registered initially on the Note Register in the name of Cede & Co., the nominee of the initial Clearing Agency, and no Note Owner will receive a definitive Note representing such Note Owner’s interest in such Note, except as provided in Section 2.13. Unless and until definitive, fully registered Notes (the “Definitive Notes”) have been issued to such Note Owners pursuant to Section 2.13: (i) the provisions of this Section shall be in full force and effect; (ii) the Note Registrar and the Indenture Trustee shall be entitled to deal with the Clearing Agency for all purposes of this Indenture (including the payment of principal of and interest on the Notes and the giving of instructions or directions hereunder) as the sole holder of the Notes, and shall have no obligation to the Note Owners, except as stated in Section 7.05; (iii) to the extent that the provisions of this Section conflict with any other provisions of this Indenture, the provisions of this Section shall control; (iv) the rights of Note Owners shall be exercised only through the Clearing Agency and shall be limited to those established by law and agreements between such Note Owners and the Clearing Agency and/or the Clearing Agency Participants pursuant to the Note Depository Agreement. Unless and until Definitive Notes are issued pursuant to Section 2.13, the initial Clearing Agency will make book-entry transfers among the Clearing Agency Participants and receive and transmit payments of principal of and interest on the Notes to such Clearing Agency Participants; and (v) whenever this Indenture requires or permits actions to be taken based upon instructions or directions of Holders of Notes evidencing a specified percentage of the Outstanding Amount of the Controlling Securities, the Clearing Agency shall be deemed to represent such percentage only to the extent that it has received instructions to such effect from Note Owners and/or Clearing Agency Participants owning or representing, respectively, such required percentage of the beneficial interest in the Controlling Securities and has delivered such instructions to the Indenture Trustee.