Technical Presentations Sample Clauses

The TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS clause establishes requirements and procedures for the submission and review of technical presentations related to a project or contract. Typically, it outlines when and how parties must deliver presentations, the format and content expected, and any approval or feedback processes involved. This clause ensures that all technical information is communicated clearly and consistently, facilitating informed decision-making and alignment between parties throughout the project.
Technical Presentations. The following presentations were made on current paleoseismic research and related activities in Utah: • Preliminary results from the Penrose Drive trench on the Salt Lake City segment; Chris DuRoss, UGS • Update on fault trenching at the Baileys Lake site, West Valley fault zone; Mike Hylland, UGS • A brief summary of recent work on the northern Nephi segment of the Wasatch fault, Utah; Daniel Horns, Utah Valley University (UVU) • Joes Valley fault zone; Lucy Piety, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) • Main Canyon and East Canyon faults; Lucy Piety, USBR • Interactive Utah Quaternary fault map demonstration; Corey Unger and Mike Hylland, UGS • HAZDOCS document archive presentation and progress report on UGS publishing USBR seismotectonic reports in the Paleoseismology of Utah series; Steve Bowman, UGS • Utah Lake faults study – Preliminary progress report as of 2/15/2011; David Dinter, University of Utah Department of Geology and Geophysics (UUGG) • Update on the Working Group on Utah Earthquake Probabilities; Ivan Wong, URS Corp. • Integration of paleoseismic data from multiple sites to develop an objective earthquake chronology – Application to the Weber segment of the Wasatch fault zone, Utah; Chris DuRoss, UGS • Implementation: The third dimension of seismic hazard mitigation; Ron Harris, Brigham Young University (BYU) A scheduled presentation by Jim Evans, Utah State University, on the East Cache fault zone trenching study was cancelled because Jim failed to attend the meeting. • Recommendations to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) for the Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States regarding the Joes Valley fault zone and the East Canyon and Main Canyon (East of East Canyon) faults; discussion moderator Bill Lund, UGS Recent USBR investigations of the Joes Valley fault zone and the East Canyon and Main Canyon (East of East Canyon) faults (see ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇) completed as part of seismic hazard evaluations for the Joes Valley and East Canyon dams demonstrate that (a) the Joes Valley fault zone likely consists of shallow structures (a few to five kilometers deep) that may not be seismogenic, (b) clear evidence of Quaternary surface faulting is lacking on the East Canyon fault, and (c) the Main Canyon fault has had two surface-faulting earthquakes during the past 30,000 to 38,000 years, with the most recent earthquake likely occurring shortly before 5000 to 6000 years ago (Piety and others, 2010). The Joes ...
View SourceView Similar (4)
Technical Presentations. ▪ Canada and Newfoundland and Labrador Aqua Link (CANAL) Presentation - CANAL was first developed as a pilot project through ResEau funding - It was developed as a tool to bring water quality data/information to Canadians - Its main goal is to convert information to knowledge - It is an innovative product that was achieved through partnership under the Agreement - There was a substantial exchange of expertise that allowed this project to work - The general public accesses CANAL through one web page, however, it is blended from federal and provincial ▇▇▇▇▇▇ - CANAL has also been repackaged and can be accessed through Google Earth - It is an ideal location to continue to add data /tools - CANAL web site is launched and is awaiting a press release under the Agreement - There was a lot of background work to develop CANAL (ie; convert Site Doc into database; convert spreadsheets into database; develop development pressures calculator; development and implementation of WQI protocols with VMV codes; etc.) - The weakest link with CANAL is the downloading of data from ENVIRODAT; it is not user-friendly and the data is out-of-date; it is not being updated and managed properly. - There was a lot of work initiated throughout the CANAL project, however, some of the work never got implemented into the web site (i.e. created an automated calculator but did not implement it; watershed rollup capacity of WQI scores not implemented; site-specific guidelines WQI calculator was developed but not implemented; etc) - NL continued to work in many areas as a result of CANAL (CANAL paper submitted in Dec 2005 awaiting a response; paper on relative ranking of WQMA sites using WQI submitted in Dec 2005 awaiting a response; integration of CANAL into GIS Intranet system) - There is a lot of work continuing that can be incorporated into the CANAL web site such as:
View SourceView Similar (3)
Technical Presentations. 3.2.1. Integrated sustainable solid waste management in Ghana- Challenges and prospects 3.2.2. Integrated sustainable solid waste management in Ghana- Socioeconomic constraints and prospects 3.2.3. Integrated solid waste management- Institutional and legal challenges
View Source
Technical Presentations. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ from DTU summarized the conclusions drawn during the Symposium and listed the many topics tackling blade erosion. He highlighted the typical challenges and indicated the five work directions that were identified. He concluded by answering the question “What can we learn from modelling?” and presented the main directions and their outputs. The most promising ones are structured coatings, AI & data management and the inclusion of manufacturing defects in models. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ from ORE Catapult presented a research plan including industry needs: lifetime prediction and material solutions. She highlighted the role of recovery and stressed the need to understand real damage types and to standardize data analysis. The main challenge is to make rain erosion tests as close to reality as possible. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ from SGRE described how the failure modes caused by rotating arm rain erosion tests, with realistic speeds but accelerated rain, correlate well with field data (DuraLedge project). He presented state of the art modelling and mentioned further research needs towards understanding the governing parameters of blade erosion. According to him, the Cobra project represents a good starting point. Finally, he presented the existing leading- edge protection (LEP) types and research needs in this area as well, which lie mainly in the need for standardization within the industry. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ from University Cardenal Herrera – CEU started on presenting current results of his research on material properties and modelling; he tackled the erosion problem as an acoustic problem, investigating stress transmission through the different layers of a rigid body (blade model). This approach allows to decomplexify the model, and separates fatigue in two distinct categories: wear and delamination. Internal defects (bubbles) and their damping effect on the strain in LEP multilayer systems especially raised the interest of the audience. ▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ from ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ University provided an overview and assessment of use of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) tool to estimate the leading-edge erosion (▇▇▇) potential of a given location for current and future conditions. Results of simulations for the USA showed that, in regions prone to hail events, a curtailment of the turbine for 95 minutes per year could reduce the energy transfer from the environment to the blade by 96%! Forecasting these events could therefore contribute greatly to erosion mitigation. T...
View Source
Technical Presentations. The following presentations were made on current paleoseismic research and related activities in Utah: • Brigham City segment, trenching update; Tony Crone/Steve Personius, USGS • Washington fault northern segment, trenching update; Bill Lund/Tyler Knudsen, UGS • Washington fault Southern Beltway trenching investigation; Dave Simon, Simon - Bymaster, Inc. • U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Utah fault studies update; Larry Anderson, USBR • Bear River fault zone, trenching update; Suzanne Hecker, USGS • Salt Lake City segment/West Valley fault zone investigation, progress report: Mike Hylland, UGS • Working Group on Utah Earthquake Probabilities; Ivan Wong, URS Corp. A scheduled presentation by Jim Evans, USU, on the East Cache fault zone trenching study was cancelled because Jim did not attend the meeting.
View Source
Technical Presentations. List of all technical presentations (in reverse chronological order) related to micro-ROS as input for the corresponding achieved KPI in Section 3.6 2020 December, 16th micro-ROS: bringing ROS 2 to MCUs ROS-Industrial Conference 2020 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ December, 16th Advanced Execution Management in ROS 2 ROS-Industrial Conference 2020 ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ November, 12th micro-ROS: bringing ROS 2 to MCUs ROS World 2020 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ November, 12th Powered by FIWARE Systems for Robotics-based Agile Manufacturing ROS World 2020 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ November, 11th Powered by FIWARE Systems for Agile Production ROS Embedded Working Group ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ October, 26th Powered by FIWARE Digital Twins for ROS, micro-ROS and OPC UA based robotics systems Joint FIWARE and ETSI ISG CIM Workshop on Digital Twins ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ September , 23rd FIWARE & micro-ROS "Enabling Robotics Systems on Micro-controllers" FIWARE Wednesday Webinars ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ September , 20th The rclc Executor: Domain-specific deterministic scheduling EMSOFT 2020 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ mechanisms for ROS applications on microcontrollers September , 17th micro-ROS: Bringing ROS 2 into microcontrollers ROS 2 TSC ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ September , 16th micro-ROS benchmarking ROS2 Embedded WG #2 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ September , 1st micro-ROS: Bringing ROS 2 into microcontrollers ROS Real-Time Working Group ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ July, 22nd FIWARE Interfaces with Machine and Robots FIWARE Wednesday Webinar ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ July, 16th The micro-ROS tutorial at BOSCH BOSCH internal Workshop ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Moral ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ July, 7th Bringing micro-ROS to PX4-based flying systems PX4 Developers Summit ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ June, 27th Introduction to micro-ROS: getting started with Zephyr ROS Developers Day ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, 25th Micro XRCE-DDS & micro-ROS - Bringing DDS and ROS into microcontrollers DIH² Webinar ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ June, 22th Micro XRCE-DDS & micro-ROS - Bringing DDS and ROS into microcontrollers FIWARE TSC ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ June, 17th Micro XRCE-DDS & micro-ROS - Bringing DDS and ROS into microcontrollers FIWARE Foundation webinar ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ June, 12th Micro XRCE-DDS & micro-ROS - Bringing DDS and ROS into microcontrollers FIWARE Robotics Tech Roadmap WG ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ March, 4th OFERA Workshop on Overcoming ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ the boundaries of today's Robotics Software Enginee...
View Source

Related to Technical Presentations

  • Technical Specifications The purpose of the Technical Specifications (TS), is to define the technical characteristics of the Goods and Related Services required by the Procuring Entity. The Procuring Entity shall prepare the detailed TS consider that:

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics

  • Technical Support Services 2.1 The technical support services (the "Services"): Party A agrees to provide to Party B the relevant services requested by Party B, which are specified in Exhibit 1 attached hereto ("Exhibit 1").

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • CONTRACTOR’S REPRESENTATIONS A. In order to induce Owner to enter into this Contract, Contractor makes the following representations: 1. Contractor has examined and carefully studied the Contract Documents, including Addenda. 2. Contractor has visited the Site, conducted a thorough visual examination of the Site and adjacent areas, and become familiar with the general, local, and Site conditions that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. 3. Contractor is familiar with all Laws and Regulations that may affect cost, progress, and performance of the Work. 4. Contractor has carefully studied the reports of explorations and tests of subsurface conditions at or adjacent to the Site and the drawings of physical conditions relating to existing surface or subsurface structures at the Site that have been identified in the Supplementary Conditions, with respect to the Technical Data in such reports and drawings. 5. Contractor has carefully studied the reports and drawings relating to Hazardous Environmental Conditions, if any, at or adjacent to the Site that have been identified in the Supplementary Conditions, with respect to Technical Data in such reports and drawings. 6. Contractor has considered the information known to Contractor itself; information commonly known to contractors doing business in the locality of the Site; information and observations obtained from visits to the Site; the Contract Documents; and the Technical Data identified in the Supplementary Conditions or by definition, with respect to the effect of such information, observations, and Technical Data on (a) the cost, progress, and performance of the Work; (b) the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures of construction to be employed by Contractor; and (c) Contractor’s safety precautions and programs. 7. Based on the information and observations referred to in the preceding paragraph, Contractor agrees that no further examinations, investigations, explorations, tests, studies, or data are necessary for the performance of the Work at the Contract Price, within the Contract Times, and in accordance with the other terms and conditions of the Contract. 8. Contractor is aware of the general nature of work to be performed by Owner and others at the Site that relates to the Work as indicated in the Contract Documents. 9. Contractor has given Engineer written notice of all conflicts, errors, ambiguities, or discrepancies that Contractor has discovered in the Contract Documents, and of discrepancies between Site conditions and the Contract Documents, and the written resolution thereof by Engineer is acceptable to Contractor. 10. The Contract Documents are generally sufficient to indicate and convey understanding of all terms and conditions for performance and furnishing of the Work. 11. Contractor’s entry into this Contract constitutes an incontrovertible representation by Contractor that without exception all prices in the Agreement are premised upon performing and furnishing the Work required by the Contract Documents.