Certificated Staff Evaluation Clause Samples

The CERTIFICATED STAFF EVALUATION clause establishes the procedures and standards for assessing the performance of employees who hold teaching or administrative certificates. Typically, this clause outlines the frequency of evaluations, the criteria used, and the roles of supervisors or administrators in conducting assessments. Its core function is to ensure that certificated staff meet professional expectations and to provide a structured process for feedback and improvement, thereby supporting accountability and professional development within the organization.
Certificated Staff Evaluation. (Teachers and Other Personnel)
View SourceView Similar (7)
Certificated Staff Evaluation. Certificated classroom teachers and education staff associates holding non-administrative positions (collectively referred to as "employees" herein) shall be evaluated during each school year in accordance with the procedures and criteria set forth in this policy. Every employee whose work is judged unsatisfactory based upon the evaluation criteria shall be placed in a probationary status no later than February 1 and shall be given until May 1 to demonstrate improvement in his/her areas of deficiency.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Certificated Staff Evaluation. We believe the ultimate goal of all measures should be to improve teaching and learning. We believe that professional conversation is the most powerful approach to promote teacher learning, and that these conversations must be grounded in an instructional framework that informs and identifies effective practices that improve student learning. Regular reflective conversation about practice requires us to understand, analyze and respond to student learning in the classroom. Therefore, teacher evaluations should: Focus on learning Support growth Guide instruction Certificated classroom teachers and education staff associates holding non-administrative positions (collectively referred to as "employees" herein) shall be evaluated during each school year in accordance with the procedures and criteria set forth in this policy. Every employee whose work is judged unsatisfactory based upon the evaluation criteria shall be placed in a probationary status no later than February 1st and shall be given until May 1st to demonstrate improvement in his/her areas of deficiency.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Certificated Staff Evaluation. Purpose A. The parties agree that the following evaluation system is to be implemented in a manner consistent with good faith and mutual respect, as defined in RCW 28A.405.110 (1), The purpose of this evaluation system for teachers has the following elements, goals, and objectives: (1) The evaluation procedures set forth herein shall be to improve the educational program by improving the quality of instruction. (2) The evaluation process shall recognize strengths, identify areas needing improvement, and provide support for professional growth. (3) Within the selected instructional framework teachers will be allowed to exercise their professional judgment and will be evaluated on their own practice, skills, and knowledge. (4) An evaluation system should be grounded in trust and respect by all parties through the use of objective standards and by minimizing subjectivity. • Criteria shall mean the eight (8) state defined categories to be scored. • Component shall mean the sub-section of each criterion.
View Source
Certificated Staff Evaluation. Preamble Therefore teacher evaluations should: Be a collaborative process between teachers and administrator
View Source
Certificated Staff Evaluation. To ensure confidentiality administrators will do all typing, copying, filing and handling of employees’ evaluations. This entire section shall be opened for renegotiation upon District receipt of written administrative rule changes from Washington State relating to staff evaluations. The evaluation procedure shall recognize high levels of performance and encourage improvement in specific, identifiable areas through the systematic assessment of the instructional program. It shall be understood by the parties that the purpose of this evaluation procedure is to improve the instructional program being offered by the District.
View Source
Certificated Staff Evaluation 
View SourceView Similar (5)

Related to Certificated Staff Evaluation

  • Conhecimento da Lingua O Contratado, pelo presente instrumento, declara expressamente que tem pleno conhecimento da língua inglesa e que leu, compreendeu e livremente aceitou e concordou com os termos e condições estabelecidas no Plano e no Acordo de Atribuição (“Agreement” ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇).

  • Monitoring and Risk Assessment of Securities Depositories Prior to the placement of any assets of the Fund with a non-U.S. Securities Depository, the Custodian: (a) shall provide to the Fund or its authorized representative an assessment of the custody risks associated with maintaining assets within such Securities Depository; and (b) shall have established a system to monitor the custody risks associated with maintaining assets with such Securities Depository on a continuing basis and to promptly notify the Fund or its Investment Adviser of any material changes in such risk. In performing its duties under this subsection, the Custodian shall use reasonable care and may rely on such reasonable sources of information as may be available including but not limited to: (i) published ratings; (ii) information supplied by a Subcustodian that is a participant in such Securities Depository; (iii) industry surveys or publications; (iv) information supplied by the depository itself, by its auditors (internal or external) or by the relevant Foreign Financial Regulatory Authority. It is acknowledged that information procured through some or all of these sources may not be independently verifiable by the Custodian and that direct access to Securities Depositories is limited under most circumstances. Accordingly, the Custodian shall not be responsible for errors or omissions in its duties hereunder provided that it has performed its monitoring and assessment duties with reasonable care. The risk assessment shall be provided to the Fund or its Investment Advisor by such means as the Custodian shall reasonably establish. Advices of material change in such assessment may be provided by the Custodian in the manner established as customary between the Fund and the Custodian for transmission of material market information.

  • Certification as to Authorized Persons The Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Fund will at all times maintain on file with the Bank his or her certification to the Bank, in such form as may be acceptable to the Bank, of (i) the names and signatures of the Authorized Persons and (ii) the names of the members of the Board, it being understood that upon the occurrence of any change in the information set forth in the most recent certification on file (including without limitation any person named in the most recent certification who is no longer an Authorized Person as designated therein), the Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Fund will sign a new or amended certification setting forth the change and the new, additional or omitted names or signatures. The Bank will be entitled to rely and act upon any Officers' Certificate given to it by the Fund which has been signed by Authorized Persons named in the most recent certification received by the Bank.

  • Record and File Retention Grantee must maintain these files for five years after the end of the applicable fiscal year, except that, if any litigation, claim or audit is commenced with respect to the transactions documented by such files before the end of the aforementioned five-year period and extends beyond the expiration of the five-year period, these files must be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the files have been resolved.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.