Detailed Evaluations of Alternative(s Clause Samples

Detailed Evaluations of Alternative(s. The Consultant will further evaluate each design alternative and the null alternative with specific engineering analyses and considerations. Analyses will be conceptual and limited to determining the relative suitability of each design alternative, and will include: • Design geometry, including the identification and comparison of alignment constraints and (where applicable) justification for retaining nonstandard design features, per the NYSDOT Highway Design Manual. • Environmental constraints and potential environmental impact mitigation measures (identified under Section 4 tasks). • Traffic flow and safety considerations, including signs, signals, and level of service analysis for intersections.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Detailed Evaluations of Alternative(s. The Consultant will further evaluate each design alternative and the null alternative with specific engineering analyses and considerations. Analyses will be conceptual and limited to determining the relative suitability of each design alternative, and will include: - design geometry, including the identification and comparison of alignment constraints and (where applicable) justification for retaining nonstandard design features, per Chapter 2, Section 2.8 of the NYSDOT Highway Design Manual. - environmental constraints and potential environmental impact mitigation measures (identified under Section 4 tasks). - traffic flow and safety considerations, including signs, signals, and level of service analysis for intersections. - pavement. - structures, including bridges, retaining walls, major culverts, and building alterations (limited to establishing basic concepts, accommodating clearances and stream flow, and estimating costs). Bridge investigative work (inspection, deck coring, etc.) is covered under Section 2. - drainage. - maintenance responsibility. - maintenance and protection of traffic during construction. - soil and foundation considerations. - utilities. - right-of-way acquisition requirements. - accessibility for pedestrians, bicyclists and the disabled. - construction cost factors. The Consultant will prepare the following drawings for each design alternative analyzed: - 1 = 20’ plans showing (as a minimum) stationed centerlines; roadway geometrics; major drainage features; construction limits; cut and fill limits; and proposed right-of-way acquisition lines. - profiles, at a scale of 1” = 20’ horizontal and 1”= 4’ (maximum) vertical, showing (as a minimum) the vertical datum reference; significant elevations; existing ground line; theoretical grade line; grades; vertical curve data including sight distances; critical clearances at structures; centerline stations and equalities; construction limits; and superelevation data. - typical sections showing (as a minimum) lane, median, and shoulder widths; ditches; gutters; curbs; and side slopes.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Detailed Evaluations of Alternative(s. The Consultant will further evaluate each design alternative and the null alternative with specific engineering analyses and considerations. Analyses will be conceptual and limited to determining the relative suitability of each design alternative, and will include: • Design geometry, including the identification and comparison of alignment constraints and (where applicable) justification for retaining nonstandard design features, per the NYSDOT Highway Design Manual. • Environmental constraints and potential environmental impact mitigation measures (identified under Section 4 tasks). • Traffic flow and safety considerations, including signs, signals, and level of service analysis for intersections. • Structures, including bridges, retaining walls, major culverts, and building alterations (limited to establishing basic concepts, accommodating clearances and stream flow, and estimating costs). Bridge investigative work (inspection, deck coring, etc.) is covered under Section 2. • Drainage. • Maintenance responsibility. • Maintenance and protection of traffic during construction. • Soil and foundation considerations. • Utilities. • Right-of-way acquisition requirements. • Conceptual landscaping (performed by a Registered Landscape Architect). • Accessibility for pedestrians, bicyclists and the disabled. • Lighting. • Construction cost factors.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Detailed Evaluations of Alternative(s. The Consultant will further evaluate each design alternative and the null alternative with specific engineering analyses and considerations. Analyses will be conceptual and limited to determining the relative suitability of each design alternative, and will include: • Design geometry, including the identification and comparison of alignment constraints and (where applicable) justification for retaining nonstandard design features, per the NYSDOT Highway Design Manual.8 • Environmental constraints and potential environmental impact mitigation measures (identified under Section 4 tasks) • Traffic safety considerations including signs • Pavement • Drainage • Maintenance responsibility • Maintenance and protection of traffic during construction • Utilities • Right-of-way acquisition requirements • Conceptual landscaping • Accessibility for pedestrians, bicyclists and the disabled • Lighting • Construction cost factors • Meeting/review with NYSDOT The Consultant will prepare the following drawings for each design alternative analyzed:
View Source
Detailed Evaluations of Alternative(s. The Consultant will further evaluate each design alternative and the null alternative with specific engineering analyses and considerations. Analyses will be conceptual and limited to determining the relative suitability of each design alternative, and will include: • Design geometry, including the identification and comparison of alignment constraints and (where applicable) justification for retaining nonstandard design features, per the “Locally Administered Federal Aid Procedures Manual.” • Environmental constraints and potential environmental impact mitigation measures (identified under Section 4 tasks). • Traffic flow and safety considerations, including signs, signals, and level of service analysis for intersections.
View Source

Related to Detailed Evaluations of Alternative(s

  • Performance Evaluations Employee performance shall be evaluated and communicated on a yearly basis as required under County policy. Performance evaluations are used to demonstrate to employees that they are valued; record how an employee’s performance meet the requirements of the job; create a job history record; identify employee strengths and areas for enhancement; assist the employee and supervisor in an effort to attain the highest level of performance; and reinforce performance standards. Every effort will be made to include substantiated information within an employee’s performance evaluation. Non-recurring discipline history which is more than two (2) years old will not be referenced in performance evaluations. The County shall ensure employee performance evaluations are conducted in accordance with County and departmental policy. Performance evaluations and disciplinary matters shall only be conducted by County employees. When an employee who does not agree with the overall rating he/she receives on his/her written performance evaluation, he/she shall discuss and attempt to resolve the differences with his/her immediate supervisor. If discussion with his/her immediate supervisor does not result in resolution of the differences, the employee may file a written request to meet with the next level of management. Said request shall state the unresolved issues and the specific changes in the written performance evaluation the employee is seeking. The appropriate manager shall meet with the employee to discuss the unresolved issues. If the issues are not resolved to the employee’s satisfaction following discussion with the appropriate manager, the employee may within thirty (30) working days file a written request for a meeting with the department head. Within fourteen (14) working days of receipt of a written request stating the unresolved issues and the desired changes in the written performance evaluation, the department head shall meet with the employee to discuss the issues. Within ten (10) working days of said meeting, the department head shall respond in writing to the employee. The decision of the Department Head shall be final and not subject to the grievance procedure. An employee may submit a written response to his/her evaluation that shall be placed in his/her personnel file.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.