Final Reporting Clause Samples

Final Reporting. The Recipient must provide the Province with a final report that summarizes the outcome(s) and work completed, including financial reporting, on the selected Project(s). The final report will be required by March 31, 2025. In February 2025, the Province will provide material to support this report, including instructions and a template.

Final Reporting. Sac Metro Air District will submit the final performance report to the EPA within 120 days after the project period end date or termination of the EPA assistance agreement. The report will be based on the data submitted in the final performance report from El Dorado AQMD.

Final Reporting. Subrecipients are required to submit a final report no later than January 31, 2021 to the Department including: a. Summary narrative description of how funds were utilized and their impact. b. Itemized list of expenditures including type, description, vendor (if applicable), dollar amount, date incurred c. Identification of the dollar amount of any unspent funds (if applicable) d. Documentation to support the payment of the itemized expenditures e. Copies of any reporting to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) on Provider Relief Funds (“PRF”), Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”) Streamlined Project Applications, and any other reporting for other sources of funding for financial recovery from COVID-19.

Final Reporting. Upon completion of the project, the Recipient shall submit on such form(s) as shall be provided by the Office of Arts & Culture, a written final report of the service rendered by the Recipient for which it requests reimbursement pursuant to this Agreement. This report shall include proof of the required credit described in Section 200-C, proof that required permits for the project were obtained, final budget and receipts for expenditures covered by this funding.

Final Reporting. El Dorado AQMD will submit the final performance report to the Sac Metro Air District within 90 days after the project period end date or termination of the EPA assistance agreement.

Final Reporting. Providing a comprehensive report on the project's progress and outcomes at the end of the funding period. These milestones ensure a structured and effective rollout of the project, with a focus on integrating innovative AI solutions, empowering carers through digital platforms, and establishing sustainable practices for ongoing carer support. Which care providers, NHS and voluntary and community groups and ICS partners, have been involved in developing this proposal?2 Regional: the pilot for this scheme was developed following review of the tool at the West Midlands Regional Carers Group, comprising of carers leads and commissioners across 14 local authorities. Through this group we share learning, findings from engagement and best practice, all of which informed the pilot approach. Coventry: As part of the pilot Coventry will be engaging with local carers and carer support organisations to gain feedback on how useful they find the platform, any improvements to consider and accessibility. We will then use this feedback to adapt the platform through the formal commissioning process. This will include feedback obtained through our two adult social care reference groups, and face to face engagement at carers support groups, community hubs and libraries to gain qualitative feedback alongside the quantitative feedback obtained via the tool. Warwickshire: Will take a similar approach to Coventry engaging will carers and key stakeholders to build on learning from the current Midlands wide pilot. Local adaptations will be discussed with the platform provider to include functionality such as online carers assessment and support planning which will interface with and support our commissioned provider support for carers. We will engage our carers reference group, local carers groups our community, our carers forum members and our primary care networks to support this offer. Both Coventry and Warwickshire will deploy the tool in close collaboration with our local commissioned carer charities and services, Carers Trust Heart of England (Coventry) and Caring Together Warwickshire (Warwickshire). What are the biggest challenges you foresee in delivering your proposal and why? (approx. 200 words)2 Stakeholder Engagement and Adoption: The primary challenge lies in ensuring effective stakeholder engagement and adoption. This involves aligning the diverse interests and expectations of healthcare providers, carers, and charity organisations with the project’s goals. Despite t...

Final Reporting. 9.1 The Proponent shall, if requested by the City, permit representatives of the City and/or Canada to discuss the foregoing with its auditors and take any necessary steps required to provide any requested information to the City and/or Canada in relation to the audit.

Final Reporting. As-built data must be delivered at the completion of the project and should be accurate within reasonable parameters. Methods used for ensuring accuracy may include, but not be limited to digitizing GIS data to match statewide aerial imagery, which is map accurate at a 1:2400 or 1”=200’. Statewide aerial imagery is published through the state Geographic Information Council and located here: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/apps/mapviewer/index.html?layers=1a3f8aa93e674dcd93396b8d2c11e4 90 Imagery is on a planned update of once per year. Therefore, modifying planning-level data to conform to as-built data by mapping at a 1:2400 scale using statewide aerials is an acceptable approach for ensuring horizontal accuracy thresholds have been met in accordance with this data standard. Regardless of the approach, applicants must document their methods chosen in the metadata for a given data layer. Grantees will be required to produce a project closeout document that provides programmatic detail along with information around other contractual obligations outlined in Exhibit A of the grant agreement. Grantees must also provide a post-construction list of addresses to the SCBBO which shall include information on advertised speeds as well as speed and latency tests for those consumers that take service. Additional reporting may be required based on supplemental guidance from US Treasury under ARPA. The SCBBO shall provide templates for both project closeout as well as post construction reporting of speed and latency tests for consumers that subscribe to service. Speed and Latency Testing To ensure broadband infrastructure investments meet ARPA requirements to deliver service that reliably meets or exceeds symmetrical download and upload speeds of 100 Mbps, the SCBBO will accept reporting of speed and latency measurements using industry-recognized best practices when conducting speed tests to comply with post construction reporting requirements outlined in SCBBO administered ARPA grant programs. In addition to demonstrating speed requirements are met, network latency measurements during testing windows should fall at or below 100 milliseconds round-trip time. This approach ensures a connection that supports reasonably foreseeable real-time applications. Additional details are provided in the sections that follow. A* Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contri...

Final Reporting. Grantee will submit a final report, no later than August 15, 2019 March 13, 2020, or 30 days after the grant amount has been fully expended, whichever comes first, including all items listed in 2.2 (1) above as well as cancelled checks, invoices and paid bills, agreement and sub award documents, and records sufficient to detail history of procurements. These records must prove the total expenditure of the Grant Amount and the required total match pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §206.95, subdivision 4, or if less than all grant funds were expended, the total of the expended grant funds and the proportionate match required by Minnesota Statutes, §206.95, subdivision 4. REVISION 5: Section 6 “Authorized Representative” is amended as follows: The State’s Authorized Representative is ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, Director of Elections, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ Rev. ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, MN 55155-1299, ▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇, or his successor, and has the responsibility to monitor the Grantee’s performance and compliance with this agreement. Grantee’s Authorized Representative is ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Auditor-Treasurer, ▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇. ▇▇, ▇▇. ▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, m .▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.us, 763-682-7578. Grant payment will be made to: ▇▇▇▇▇▇ County Federal ID Number: ▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Grantee must be registered as a vendor in the SWIFT system, or must provide a W-9 form with this executed agreement, in order for State to register Grantee in the SWIFT system. If Grantee’s Authorized Representative changes at any time before the funds provided for in this agreement are fully expended, Grantee must immediately notify the State. Except as amended herein, the terms and conditions of the Original Contract and all previous amendments remain in full force and effect.