Justification of Resources Sample Clauses

The Justification of Resources clause requires parties to provide a clear rationale for the allocation and use of resources within a project or agreement. This typically involves detailing why specific personnel, equipment, or funding levels are necessary to achieve the objectives, often through supporting documentation or budget breakdowns. By mandating transparency and accountability in resource planning, this clause helps prevent waste, ensures efficient use of funds, and supports informed decision-making by stakeholders.
Justification of Resources. Please provide a justification of all resources that are requested (UK and Brazilian). This is an open funding opportunity and applications can be submitted to the standard board deadlines. All proposals for MRC grant funding are assessed through a two-stage process involving independent expert reviewers and the MRC research boards/panels. For each application, FAPESP will nominate at least one peer reviewer to provide a written assessment. Peer reviewers will use the criteria and procedures applicable to MRC. These comments will be formally incorporated in the MRC’s peer review processes. If applications are shortlisted to be assessed by the Research Board, FAPESP are invited to participate in the process either via correspondence or in person. Please note that the involvement of FAPESP in the review process requires that each application is shared with FAPESP officers. Applications received under the terms of this MoU will be subject to the same terms and conditions as all MRC Grants. Further information and guidance on submitting an application under this MoU to the MRC can be found on the MRC website: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/funding/science-areas/international-and- global-health-research/subscriptions-partnerships/other-international-funding-activities/ Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) (▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇) NERC accepts proposals under the terms of this Agreement to its Discovery Science (Responsive Mode) Standard, New Investigator and Large Grant Schemes. Details of these schemes can be found at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/funding/available/researchgrants/ . The NERC Grants handbook (▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/funding/application/howtoapply/forms/ ) provides further information on the Standard, New Investigator and Large Grant Schemes. It details the eligibility criteria, information on how to apply and terms and conditions of awards. There may also be the opportunity to apply for a joint NERC/FAPESP grant under specific Research Programme or International calls. These opportunities will be highlighted in the Announcement of Opportunity (AO) for the specific call. The UK proposal must be submitted electronically by the UK-based Principal Investigator’s Research Organisation to the NERC Standard, New Investigator or Large Grant scheme (or specific call, where applicable) via the Joint Electronic Submission (Je-S) System. Brazilian partners should contact FAPESP in advance to confirm their eligibility and submit a parralel application to FAPESP using SAGe. T...
View SourceView Similar (4)
Justification of Resources. (maximum of two sides of A4)‌
View SourceView Similar (2)
Justification of Resources. (maximum of two sides of A4)‌ A two-side A4 statement justifying that the resources requested are appropriate to undertake the research project. The justification of resources should explain why the resources requested are appropriate for the research proposed, taking into account the nature and complexity of the research proposal. It should not be simply a list of the resources required, as this is already given in the Je-S form. Where you do not provide explanation for an item that requires justification, it will be cut from any grant made. Proposals which include co-investigators from third sector organisations that are deemed not to engage in economic activity must provide evidence of this status within the Justification of Resources statement. Please refer to the joint Research Council Je-S ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇- ▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ments/ESRCSpecificRequirements.htm for further guidance. Data Management Plan (maximum of three sides of A4 per applicant)‌ It is a requirement of the ESRC Research Data Policy ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ that all applicants planning to generate data as part of their grant must include a Data Management Plan. The Data Management Plan should be used as an opportunity to describe how the data, ie primary input into research and first-order results of that research, are going to be managed - starting from planning for research and through the life-cycle of the grant until data is accepted for archiving by the UK Data Service. The ESRC recognises the importance of research data quality and provenance. Research data generated by ESRC-funded research must be well-managed by the ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ during the grant period to enable their data to be exploited to the maximum potential for further research. For further guidance see the Je-S Helptext. CV (maximum of two sides of A4 per applicant)‌ A CV for each applicant and named research staff member must be included for both UK and Luxembourg research teams. This should include contact details, qualifications (including class and subject), academic and professional posts held since graduation, a list of the most relevant and recent publications, and a record of research funded by the ESRC and other bodies. This should not exceed two A4 sides. The bibliography for references cited in the proposal only should be attached. Please note publications not cited in the proposal should not be added here. A list of the most relevant and recent publica...
View Source
Justification of Resources. Resources requested reflect C3T’s ambitious, interdisciplinary programme of UK and international research and engagement. They are supplemented by substantial institutional support (IS; underlined below) worth £979,815 (16% of fEC). For most items listed below, 80% is requested from ESRC while the remaining 20% will be provided by the participating research institutions. Exceptions where resources are requested at 100% cost are clearly indicated.
View Source
Justification of Resources. Research Staff Support Travel Equipment & Consumables
View Source

Related to Justification of Resources

  • Allocation of Resources Whenever a disaster causes Vendor to allocate limited resources between or among Vendor's customers, vendor will not provide priority over Prudential to any other customers of Vendor. In addition, in no event will Vendor re-deploy or reassign any vendor Key Employee (as identified and defined in an applicable Engagement Schedule) or any Affected Employee (as identified and defined in an applicable Engagement Schdule) to any other Vendor account in the event of a disaster.

  • Determination of Responsiveness 28.1 The Procuring Entity's determination of a Tender's responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the Tender itself, as defined in ITT28.2.

  • Allocation of Responsibility The City assumes no responsibility for the tax consequences of any VEBA contributions made by or on behalf of any member. Each union that elects to require VEBA contributions for the benefit of its members assumes sole responsibility for insuring that the VEBA complies with all applicable laws, including, without limitation, the Internal Revenue Code, and agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless for any taxes, penalties and any other costs and expenses resulting from such contributions.

  • Recognition of Previous Experience (a) The Employer will recognize recent related RN experience on the basis of one (1) annual increment for each one (1) year of service up to the maximum of the grid. Part-time service shall be recognized on the basis of fifteen hundred (1500) hours paid in previous employment equals one (1) year of service. It shall be the responsibility of a newly hired employee to make a claim of recent and related experience within the probationary period in order to be considered for a salary increment. If she/he fails to make a claim in the specified time period or fails to provide reasonable proof of recent related experience, she/he shall not be entitled to recognition.

  • Limitation of Responsibility Notwithstanding any other provisions ---------------------------- hereof, Committee Members shall be liable to the parties only for actions constituting bad faith, gross negligence or breach of an express provision of this Agreement (so long as such breach remains uncured after ten (10) days of receiving notice of the nature of such breach). In all other respects, Committee Members shall not be liable for negligence or mistakes of judgment.