Measurable Goals Sample Clauses

Measurable Goals. Initial IFSP meetings (and evaluations and assessments) for all infants and toddlers referred to Part C shall be conducted within 45 days of the referral.
Measurable Goals. The application shall include— (A) measurable goals, and a timeline for meeting the goals, that the State has set for addressing the assistive technology needs of individuals with disabilities in the State re- lated to— (i) education, including goals involving the provision of assistive technology to in- dividuals with disabilities who receive services under the Individuals with Dis- abilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.); (ii) employment, including goals involv- ing the State vocational rehabilitation program carried out under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 720 et seq.); (iii) telecommunication and information technology; and (iv) community living; and (B) information describing how the State will quantifiably measure the goals to deter- mine whether the goals have been achieved.
Measurable Goals. Goal 1: Initial IFSP meetings (and evaluations and assessments) for all infants and toddlers referred to Part C shall be conducted within 45 days of the referral. Goal 2: All IFSPs shall contain the early intervention services needed by the child and family to meet the functional outcomes, which are based on the unique developmental needs of the child and the resources, priorities and concerns of the family. All eligible infants and toddlers with disabilities and their families shall receive the early intervention services identified on their IFSP in a timely manner. Goal 3: Each family has a single designated service coordinator who shall: 1) coordinate all services across agency lines; 2) serve as the single point of contact for the family to help it obtain the services and assistance they need; 3) facilitate timely delivery of available services; 4) seek appropriate services necessary to benefit the development of each child served for the duration of the child's eligibility, and; (5) ensure that all families receive appropriate prior written notice and understand their procedural rights and safeguards. With prior written approval from OSEP, adjustment to the Tasks and Activities to Reach Results column listed in this table may be made when necessary to support achievement of compliance outcomes within the required timelines. The Tasks and Activities to Reach Results will be evaluated every six months to determine their effectiveness and any need for change. Any requests for change or amendments will be submitted to OSEP in writing. Objective EISNE 1: Evaluate the nature and cause of the system capacity issues. Tasks and Activities to Reach Results Verification Target Completion Date Date Completed Lead and Primary Partners EISNE 1A. Investigate personnel shortages to identify the extent and regional variations, which may impact service delivery. Summary of progress in quarterly report to OSEP. 12 months and ongoing AzEIP Professional Development Coordinator, AzEIP Staff Development and Training Project, Technical Assistance Specialist, Management and Information Specialist EISNE 1A.1 With the assistance of the Arizona State Licensing Boards for Speech Language Pathology, Physical Therapy, and Occupational Therapy, determine the total number of professionals licensed in the State. Summary of data in quarterly report to OSEP. 6 months AzEIP Professional Development Coordinator, Technical Assistance Specialist, and AzEIP Staff Development and Training Pro...
Measurable Goals. Recruitment of interested community residents to participate in the annual Watershed Masters Volunteer Training Program will be tracked.
Measurable Goals. The parties agree that the following are measurable goals to be used by the parties in determining the over-all success of DSC after the initial term of this Agreement:  The number of new sporting events booked including attendance, room nights generated, visitor spending, economic impact and local taxes generated.  The number of new sporting events and groups serviced through activities such as attendance-building, media assistance, volunteer hours, welcome banners, information tables, etc.  Developing and adhering to guidelines established by the DSC board for the percentage of locally-produced versus national/regional events and repeat versus new events.  Other quality of life indicators tied to the City’s and County’s Strategic Plans.
Measurable Goals. Goal 1: DES will monitor all State or contracted programs that provide Part C services in Arizona, for compliance with all Part C requirements. Goal 2: DES will ensure that deficiencies identified through monitoring are corrected in a timely manner. With prior written approval from OSEP, adjustment to the Tasks and Activities to Reach Results column listed in this table may be made when necessary to support achievement of compliance outcomes within the required timelines. The Tasks and Activities to Reach Results will be evaluated every six months to determine their effectiveness and any need for change. Any requests for change or amendments will be submitted to OSEP in writing. Objective GS 1: Revise the Interagency Agreement(s) with the AzEIP participating State agencies to address general supervision requirements. GS.1A. Identify the issues that need to be included in the Interagency Agreement(s) with each AzEIP participating state agency (DES, ASDB, ADHS, ADE, and AHCCCS). Summary of progress in quarterly report to OSEP. 3 months1 AzEIP Executive Director, State Interagency Team, Legal Counsel for each agency GS.1B. Convene the State Interagency Team and their legal counsel to draft Interagency Agreement(s). Draft of the Interagency Agreement(s) to OSEP 5 months AzEIP Executive Director, State Interagency Team, Legal Counsel for each agency GS.1C. Publish the Interagency Agreement(s) for Public Comment. Interagency Agreement(s) published for public comment 9 months AzEIP Executive Director GS.1D. State Interagency Team members will have legal counsel review the revised Interagency Agreement(s) that reflects changes resulting from public comment. Summary of changes made in quarterly report to OSEP. 12 months AzEIP Executive Director, State Interagency Team, Legal Counsel for each agency GS.1E. Obtain signatures of parties on Interagency Agreement(s). Summary of progress in quarterly report to OSEP. 15 months AzEIP Executive Director, State Interagency Team GS.1F. File the Interagency Agreement(s) with Secretary of State. Summary of progress in quarterly report to OSEP. 16 months DES GS.1G. Disseminate and implement Interagency Agreement(s). Final Interagency Agreement(s) submitted to OSEP and summary of implementation progress in quarterly reports to OSEP 16 months and ongoing DES/AzEIP Objective GS 2: Align policies and procedures across agencies to include general supervision and ensure compliance with Part C (on monitoring, data collection, contract ...
Measurable Goals. Total meetings with Pediatric Wellness Center pediatricians (▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, MD and ▇▇. ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, MD) for consultation, mentorship (goal #12) Total quarterly site visits with Pediatric Wellness Center pediatricians (▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, MD and ▇▇. ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, MD) for consultation, mentorship (goal #4) Objective 2-2. Expand the access to child and adolescent psychiatry clinical consultation for PCPs through the Collaborative Care Initiative (CCI) Consultation Clinic. Continue to expand the capacity of the CCI Consultation Clinic at the University of Florida Total patient slots (hours) available each month for CCI Consultations (total #15) Total psychiatrists available to see CCI Consultations (total #6) Total primary care providers invited to refer patients to the CCI Consultation Clinic (total #80) Total primary care providers who refer at least one patient for consultation in the CCI Clinic (total #50) Objective 2-3. Train UF College of Medicine-Jacksonville pediatric residents to develop skills in providing mental health for children and adolescents. This will effectively expand the capacity of the pediatric workforce of the future to deliver mental health to youth across the country.
Measurable Goals. DES will monitor all State or contracted programs that provide Part C services in Arizona, for compliance with all Part C requirements. Goal 2: DES will ensure that deficiencies identified through monitoring are corrected in a timely manner.
Measurable Goals. DES will monitor all State or contracted programs that provide Part C services in Arizona, for compliance with all Part C requirements. Goal 2: DES will ensure that deficiencies identified through monitoring are corrected in a timely manner. Verification: In its quarterly reports to OSEP and through additional specific reporting (as identified on the attached workplans), DES shall submit verification that it has: (1) revised or replaced its interagency agreement(s) among the AzEIP participating State agencies to address all Part C general supervision requirements; (2) aligned policies and procedures across agencies to include general supervision and Part C compliance issues (on monitoring, data collection, contract review and technical assistance); (3) implemented a monitoring system, which includes analysis of data to identify and correct noncompliance and ensuring correction of identified noncompliance; (4) formalized an interagency technical assistance system; (5) revised its ACTS data system to expand data collection and reporting functions, incorporating timely data access and management reporting at the local and State AzEIP offices; and (6) incorporated data elements and reports into the data systems of other Part C participating State agencies. Current Status: OSEP’s 2000 monitoring report found that DES had failed to: (1) Conduct evaluations and assessments and hold the initial Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) meeting within 45 days from initial referral; (2) Individualize, and provide in a timely manner, all early intervention services identified on the IFSP to all eligible infants and toddlers with disabilities, including infants and toddlers on reservations; and (3) Ensure that all service coordination functions are implemented. OSEP’s March 15, 2004 letter following its December 2003 verification monitoring visit to the State confirmed that the State had not corrected these areas of noncompliance.

Related to Measurable Goals

  • Performance Goals A. The Trust and State Street have developed mutually acceptable performance goals dated March 1, 2011 , and as may be amended from time to time, regarding the manner in which they expect to deliver and receive the services under this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Service Level Agreement”). The parties agree that such Service Level Agreement reflects performance goals and any failure to perform in accordance with the provisions thereof shall not be considered a breach of contract that gives rise to contractual or other remedies. It is the intention of the parties that the sole remedy for failure to perform in accordance with the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, or any dispute relating to performance goals set forth in the Service Level Agreement, will be a meeting of the parties to resolve the failure pursuant to the consultation procedure described in Sections V. B. and V.C. below. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties hereby acknowledge that any party’s failure (or lack thereof) to meet the provisions of the Service Level Agreement, while not in and of itself a breach of contract giving rise to contractual or other remedies, may factor into the Trust’s reasonably determined belief regarding the standard of care exercised by State Street hereunder.

  • Performance Measures The System Agency will monitor the Grantee’s performance of the requirements in Attachment A and compliance with the Contract’s terms and conditions.

  • Goals Goals define availability, performance and other objectives of Service provisioning and delivery. Goals do not include remedies and failure to meet any Service Goal does not entitle Customer to a Service credit.

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES 4.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) sets out- 4.1.1 the performance objectives and targets that must be met by the Employee; and 4.1.2 the time frames within which those performance objectives and targets must be met. 4.2 The performance objectives and targets reflected in Annexure A are set by the Employer in consultation with the Employee and based on the Integrated Development Plan, Service Delivery and Budget Implementation Plan (SDBIP) and the Budget of the Employer, and shall include key objectives; key performance indicators; target dates and weightings. 4.2.1 The key objectives describe the main tasks that need to be done. 4.2.2 The key performance indicators provide the details of the evidence that must be provided to show that a key objective has been achieved. 4.2.3 The target dates describe the timeframe in which the work must be achieved. 4.2.4 The weightings show the relative importance of the key objectives to each other. 4.3 The Employee’s performance will, in addition, be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan.