Student Feedback Clause Samples

Student Feedback. Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs) will be conducted in accordance with American University policy. SETs reports will be made available to an employee at the end of the semester once all grades have been submitted. Employees shall cooperate with the appropriate academic administrators to facilitate the student evaluation process.

Student Feedback. A. Every Lecturer shall have the opportunity to receive feedback from undergraduate students (unless no undergraduate students enroll in their courses), using University-approved course evaluation schedules, processes and forms, which may also include program-specific questions. Insofar as units make such processes and forms available for graduate students, Lecturers will have the opportunity to receive feedback from those students as determined by the unit. At the request of a Lecturer, any evaluation form(s) used by the academic unit will be made available to them before courses begin in a given quarter. B. A Lecturer may add questions to the student feedback form in the same manner as Statute 11.1

Student Feedback. 1. The University shall maintain a process by which students can complain in writing and/or orally about alt media services, which process will be included in the Print Access Guide. 2. The University shall specifically ask DSP students at least once a year, e.g., survey, for feedback regarding alternative media services, policies and procedures. Summaries of all such feedback received shall be included in the Annual Progress Report covering that period, subject to students’ confidentiality requirements.

Student Feedback. Ongoing review and grading of student work throughout the quarter, and submission of final grades.

Student Feedback. 1. For all Alliance members employed for or after September 1, 2015, the Center may seek student feedback of said bargaining unit members. 2. The student feedback form will be developed by the employer in consultation with the Alliance. 3. Bargaining unit members shall be provided with a summary of student feedback and an opportunity to discuss the information received. Such summary feedback may be provided in conjunction with the annual evaluation process or at other times based on Center or employee interest and need. Subsequent to such discussions, the bargaining unit member shall be accorded a period of five (5) days to submit any written response to the feedback information presented. Following the five (5) day response period, a copy of the summary student feedback report along with bargaining unit member response, if any, thereon, will be forwarded for administrative review and file. 4. Summary student feedback documents will not be made part of the bargaining unit member’s evaluation form but will be maintained as separate feedback documents for employee or Center reference; however, comments relative to information obtained from student feedback documents may be incorporated into the evaluation of a bargaining unit member. 5. At the end of the contract year (August 31), the individual student feedback forms for that year will be destroyed; however, summary data will be maintained. At any time prior to the destruction of the forms, a bargaining unit member shall upon request to the Center, be allowed to inspect the individual student feedback forms upon which the summary feedback document was based, provided that said forms are anonymous or that the names and other student identifiers are redacted from the forms.

Student Feedback. Feedback from students is gathered via a range of mechanisms: at the module level via end of module questionnaires, at the subject level via Student Liaison Groups, at the campus level via the annual Speak Week and termly Student Panels (both run by our Students’ Association), at the cohort level via surveys (e.g., the Marketing and Induction Survey, National Student Survey, Student Satisfaction and Engagement Survey), and at the institutional level via student representation on Academic Committees, including Academic Board, and via student-Board interaction through the Student Liaison Committee. The root and branch review of our student voice mechanisms conducted in 2020/21 resulted in a multi-year project plan comprising seven sub-projects: 1. Facilitating My Voice to become a triangulation tool for student voice. 2. Reviewing and updating the standard operating procedure for Student Liaison Groups to strengthen their use in a blended learning world. 3. Reviewing and updating the Student Liaison Committee to ensure its focus on strategic matters. 4. Reviewing and updating SRUCSA’s representative and democratic structures. 5. Reviewing and updating our class rep systems. 6. Facilitating the development of a Student Opportunities Hub. 7. Creating resources and guidance for clarity on Student Voice mechanisms. During 2021/22, projects 2 and 3 will be the focus for SRUC, while projects 4 and 5 will be the focus for SRUCSA. Another area of focus will be the Student Satisfaction and Engagement Survey. While SRUC received high positive feedback in the SSES this year, with an overall satisfaction rating of 87.5%, the response rate is still very low at 17.5%. Work will focus on bringing this response rate up. This has already begun with an awareness raising campaign amongst staff via Annual Quality Dialogues and relevant Committees. The National Student Survey saw an increase in responses from 71% in 2020 to 82.21% in 2021, and an increase in student satisfaction from 72% to 76.1%. Scores improved across 6 of the 8 scale questions. Of most note are ‘Organisation and Management’, ‘Assessment and Feedback’, and ‘Student Voice’, each of which improved by over 10 percentage points in 2021. In 2020/21, SRUC focused work on these areas; it is reassuring to see correlation between institutional focus and improved NSS scores. The two areas which did not improve were ‘Learning Resources’ and ‘Learning Community’. The Learning Community score, while comparable in its decre...

Student Feedback. Student feedback is essential and we already have well-developed mid-module and module evaluation. We will develop both of these further so that students receive feedback on issues that matter to them promptly.

Student Feedback. If a student has feedback for Rocky Mountain School of Photography, he or she may contact the School Director.

Student Feedback. A. Students in grades 7 through 12 will be surveyed during the last week of their class whether it is a trimester, semester or a yearlong course. B. Print copies and envelopes will be available in the mail room for all teachers who do not wish to add questions to the instrument. C. Teachers are to use questions 1-21 as they appear on the student feedback survey. The form will be available in a shared file for teachers to print and add questions as they are inclined. D. The teacher will distribute the assessment tool and will read the following statement to students: I thank you for your participation in this student feedback process. Please remember this to be anonymous. Please do not write your name on this form. E. The teachers will remain in the room but at a distance from the students while they are completing the tool. F. The teacher will designate a student to collect the completed assessment tool and place it inside an envelope and seal it. G. The teacher will collect the sealed envelope from the designated student.