Target of Evaluation Clause Samples

Target of Evaluation. An IT product and its associated administrator and user guidance documentation that is the subject of an
View SourceView Similar (3)
Target of Evaluation. The BlogForever platform is the target of our evaluation, but this system is not a single component. For the purposes of WP5, the parts of the BlogForever system to be evaluated are: (a) The crawler software: also called the "weblog spider component", under development by CyberWatcher at time of writing. This spider will be responsible for weblog data extraction, manipulation and transfer to the digital repository. The evaluation must determine how well the spider is able to harvest blogs. (b) The digital repository web application component: this will include the public delivery platform, through which renditions of harvested blogs can be viewed; and evaluation of the functionality of the repository - more precisely, those specific parts of the functionality already defined in 4.1 [1] for the repository in conjunction with the spider. Additionally, the following elements are considered to be general attributes and characteristics which the completed BlogForever platform will aim to offer. They are: ✓ Digital preservation ✓ Data migration ✓ Quality assurance checking ✓ Collection curation ✓ Additional national laws restrictions These elements will also be evaluated by WP5. It is recognised that elements may have certain dependencies on other features that the repository already has, or will develop later. Evaluation of these elements will likewise be phased in a managed fashion as these features are successfully implemented. • Repository support for file formats found in blogs • The support of METS and PREMIS metadata schema • The ability of the repository to migrate file formats, or perform encapsulation of blogs, or emulate blog functionality • The ability of the repository to run standard ingest procedures automatically (e.g. file format verification, checksums, virus scanning) • The overall capability to identify and maintain significant properties of blogs over time, and automate this process as far as possible • Repository databases for managing and storing content and metadata • Format support in the repository, e.g. the ability to export data as XML or CSV • Metadata management, including metadata for blogs, conformance with the OAI-PMH protocol and the Dublin Core schema • The repository supplying tools for data quality and integrity checking of the data itself • Well-maintained user profiles; ranking; tagging; and other metadata created by active users of the service. This will enable them to find good quality relevant posts. • The ability to det...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Target of Evaluation there are a number of generic requirements from T4.1 that will need to be mapped to the new platform features. This work will be completed by CERN as part of T5.2 specification of what features due to be tested per case study are linked to a generic D4.1 [1] requirement, grouping all the relevant features within the same thematic group.
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Target of Evaluation

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.