Timelines and reports Sample Clauses

The "Timelines and reports" clause establishes the requirements for scheduling and progress documentation within an agreement. It typically sets out deadlines for deliverables, milestones, or project phases, and outlines the frequency and format of status reports that must be provided by one or both parties. By clearly defining when tasks must be completed and how progress is communicated, this clause ensures accountability and transparency, helping to prevent misunderstandings and delays throughout the course of the project or contract.
Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the supervisory/thesis committee Klicken oder ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Sie hier, um Text einzugeben. (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can be viewed on the Internet at any time: ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇/en/academic-research/graduate-academy/doctoral-candidates/legal-and-financial-issues/good-academic-practice Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students in some of the OLTECH PhD study programmes. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion ...
View SourceView Similar (7)
Timelines and reports. 2.2.1 Planned date for submission of project proposal/protocol: 2.2.2 Planned deadline for ethics application (if applicable): 2.2.3 Progress reports should be written every by the student. 2.2.4 An annual progress report must be submitted by the supervisor for all students to HREC and for all doctoral students an annual progress report should also be submitted to the Doctoral Office (General Policies and Rules: Calendar Part 1). 2.2.5 Expected date of submission of final thesis/dissertation/research assignment: 2.2.6 Supervisor(s) should receive the final version of the student’s thesis/dissertation/research assignment date. days/weeks before submission 2.2.7 Supervisors are required to suggest possible examiners for the evaluation of a student’s thesis/dissertation/research assignment to the Postgraduate Programme Committee. This should be done with sufficient time for the Faculty Board to approve the examiners before the thesis/dissertation/research assignment is sent for examination. 2.2.8 Supervisors are required to indicate that the thesis/dissertation/research assignment is ready for submission for examination to the relevant administrative office (Doctoral Office/ Faculty Administrator/Officer). 2.2.9 Students should not know who their examiners are and may not communicate directly with the examiners (prior to the oral).
View SourceView Similar (3)
Timelines and reports. In the beginning of his/her scientific work, the PhD student should compile an exposé (thesis concept paper) with a timeline that allows a successful completion of the PhD thesis within the period agreed (usually about three years). The PhD student should wherever applicable document his/her progress in written reports. An updated time line should be part of each report. [Name of the Doctorade Candidate] will participate in the RTG program and the PhD Program [“Neurosensory Science and Systems”]. [Name of the Doctorade Candidate] will take part in the PhD program courses and events to an adequate extent. At German universities and research institutions, freedom of science in research, teaching and studies is guaranteed. This freedom is associated with responsibility for fostering the fundamental values and norms of good scientific practice, for realizing them in the researcher’s daily activity and for defending them. The successful application of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for the high standard of achievement in the scientific system. The recommendations on fundamentals for good scientific work are as follows: Awareness of principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truth maintain absolute priority in scientific work. The PhD student should be aware of all principles of good scientific practice. The information can be obtained through the participation in an adequate course offered by the Graduate School of the Faculty V and/or the daily activities of the research group. The principles of good scientific practice are to be looked up by the PhD student (e.g. at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/download/gute_wiss._praxis_web.pdf). PhD Students have to learn about good scientific practice in a corresponding Workshop. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Each PhD student is personally responsible for his/her own work. A working group or unit usually has one group leader. The group leader carries the responsibility for the work and the conditions for facilitating an effective cooperation and coordination of the members. All members of a working group must be able to rely on each other since mutual trust is the basis for all conversations, discussions and even confrontations. Cooperation in scientific working groups must allow the findings to be communicated, critically discussed and integrated into a common level of knowledge and experience. Scientific misconduct: Misconduct, including the p...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate, the doctoral student has to develop a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period (usually three to four years). The PhD student must document the course of the project in regular reports to the Thesis Committee _________________________ (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline. German universities and research institutions guarantee scientific independence in research and teaching. This freedom and independence is coupled with the individual responsibility to implement, keep and defend, if necessary, the fundamental values and standards of good scientific practice. The successful implementation of the principles of good scientific practice is a prerequisite for a high level of scientific standards. The signatories agree to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. The current guidelines of good scientific practice at the University of Oldenburg and the recommendations of the DFG (German Research Foundation) on the principles of good scientific practice can always be viewed on the Internet: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/en/academic-research/goodscientificpractice/ ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/download/pdf/dfg_im_profil/reden_stellungnahmen/download/empfehlung_wiss_praxis_0198.pdf Awareness of and sensitivity to the principles of good scientific practice: Honesty and truthfulness need to be absolute priority in scientific work. Doctoral students must know the principles of good scientific practice. Knowledge of good scientific practice is conveyed through the daily work in the working group. In addition, the visit of a course of at least one-day on the subject is mandatory for doctoral students. The principles of good scientific practice can always be consulted by the doctoral candidate. Cooperation and leadership responsibility in working groups: Doctoral students are responsible for their own research work. The primary supervisor is responsible for creating a good cooperative working climate among the group members. The individual members of the working group have to trust one another to be able to work productively, because trust is the basis of an open discussion and communication culture. The cooperation within the work group must enable the presentation of scientific results, critical discussion and incorporation of this in...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Timelines and reports. At the start of the doctorate the doctoral student has to create a project plan, which is also the planned timing of the project on a timeline. This is to ensure that a successful processing of the doctoral project within the planned total period is allowed (usually three to four years). The PhD student is obliged to document the course of the project in regular reports to the Thesis Committee (annually or bi-annually); as described in section 2a. Each report must be accompanied by an updated timeline.
View Source
Timelines and reports. 2.2.1 Planned date for submission of project proposal/protocol: 2.2.3 Planned deadline for ethics application (if applicable): 2.2.5 Progress reports should be written every by the student. 2.2.6 An annual progress report must be submitted by the supervisor for all students to HREC (General Policies and Rules: Calendar Part 1). 2.2.7 Expected date of submission of final thesis/dissertation/research assignment: 2.2.8 Supervisor(s) should receive the final version of the student’s thesis _ days/weeks before submission date. 2.2.9 Supervisors and students should take note of the timelines for submitting a research master’s thesis in the FMHS, as follows: 2.2.9.1 All students should send a completed and signed intention-to-submit form to ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇ 6 months before finally submitting a thesis for examination; 2.2.9.2 Supervisors are required suggest examiners to be nominated to the CPR in a report of the relevant Postgraduate Programme Committee 6 months prior to submission, to allow sufficient time for the Faculty Board to approve the examiners before the thesis is sent for examination; 2.2.9.3 Submissions are welcome from February to July, and no later than 30 August, with a view to possible December graduation; 2.2.9.4 Submissions are welcome in September and October, and no later than 30 November, with a view to possible March graduation; 2.2.9.5 Timelines are dependent on punctual and positive submissions from all parties. 2.2.10 Supervisors are required to indicate that the master’s thesis is ready for submission for examination by supplying a completed and signed Thesis Release Form to accompany the submission to the Tygerberg Doctoral Office (▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇). 2.2.11 Students should not know who their examiners are and may not communicate directly with the examiners (prior to the oral).
View Source

Related to Timelines and reports

  • Notice and Reports The request for the issuance of a Letter of Credit shall be submitted to the Issuing Lender at least five (5) Business Days prior to the requested date of issuance. The Issuing Lender will promptly upon request provide to the Administrative Agent for dissemination to the Revolving Lenders a detailed report specifying the Letters of Credit which are then issued and outstanding and any activity with respect thereto which may have occurred since the date of any prior report, and including therein, among other things, the account party, the beneficiary, the face amount, expiry date as well as any payments or expirations which may have occurred. The Issuing Lender will further provide to the Administrative Agent promptly upon request copies of the Letters of Credit. The Issuing Lender will provide to the Administrative Agent promptly upon request a summary report of the nature and extent of LOC Obligations then outstanding.

  • Filings and Reports (a) Each year during the term of the Fee Agreement, the Company and any Sponsor Affiliates shall deliver to the County, the County Auditor, the County Assessor and the County Treasurer a copy of their most recent annual filings with the Department with respect to the Project, not later than thirty (30) days following delivery thereof to the Department. (b) The Company shall cause a copy of this Fee Agreement, as well as a copy of the completed Form PT-443 of the Department, to be filed with the County Auditor and the County Assessor, and to their counterparts in the partner county to the MCIP Agreement, the County Administrator and the Department within thirty (30) days after the date of execution and delivery of this Fee Agreement by all parties hereto. (c) Each of the Company and any Sponsor Affiliates agree to maintain complete books and records accounting for the acquisition, financing, construction, and operation of the Project. Such books and records shall (i) permit ready identification of the various Phases and components thereof; (ii) confirm the dates on which each Phase was placed in service; and (iii) include copies of all filings made by the Company and any such Sponsor Affiliates in accordance with Section 3.03(a) or (b) above with respect to property placed in service as part of the Project.

  • Inspections and Reports 2.1 The department may inspect, in the manner and at reasonable times it considers appropriate, all the contractor's facilities and activities under this contract. 2.2 The contractor shall make progress and other reports in the manner and at the times the department reasonably requires.

  • Studies and Reports All copies in the Seller’s possession of studies and/or reports which have previously been performed in connection with or for the Property, including without limitation, environmental reports, soils studies, seismic studies, physical inspection reports, site plans and surveys, and identification of such studies of which the Seller is aware but that are not in their possession;

  • Access and Reports (a) The Company shall afford to Parent and its Representatives reasonable access during normal business hours, throughout the period prior to the earlier of the Effective Time and the Termination Date, to its and its Subsidiaries’ officers, employees, properties, contracts, commitments, books and records and any report, schedule or other document filed or received by it pursuant to the requirements of applicable Laws and shall furnish Parent with financial, operating and other data and information as Parent, through its respective officers, employees or other authorized Representatives may from time to time reasonably request in writing. (b) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall not be required to afford access pursuant to Section 7.05(a) if such access would unreasonably disrupt the operations of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or would cause a violation of any agreement to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party, nor shall Parent, any of its Representatives or the Financing Sources be permitted to perform any onsite procedure (including any onsite environmental study) with respect to any property of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. (c) This Section 7.05 shall not require the Company or its Subsidiaries to permit any access, or to disclose any information that, in the reasonable, good faith judgment (after consultation with counsel) of the Company, is likely to result in any violation of any Law or cause any privilege (including attorney-client privilege) that the Company or its Subsidiaries would be entitled to assert to be undermined with respect to such information and such undermining of such privilege could in the Company’s reasonable, good faith judgment (after consultation with counsel) adversely affect in any material respect the Company’s position in any pending litigation; provided, that , the parties hereto shall cooperate in seeking to find a way to allow disclosure of such information to the extent doing so (i) would not (in the good faith belief of the Company (after consultation with counsel)) be reasonably likely to result in the violation of any such Law or be likely to cause such privilege to be undermined with respect to such information or (ii) could reasonably (in the good faith belief of the Company (after consultation with counsel)) be managed through the use of customary “clean-room” arrangements.