Workload Review Process Sample Clauses
The Workload Review Process clause establishes a formal mechanism for regularly assessing and evaluating the distribution and volume of work assigned under an agreement. Typically, this process involves scheduled meetings or reports where parties review current workloads, identify imbalances, and discuss potential adjustments to ensure fairness and efficiency. By providing a structured approach to workload management, this clause helps prevent disputes related to overburdening, promotes transparency, and ensures that responsibilities remain manageable for all parties involved.
Workload Review Process. (a) Stage 1 - Manager Where an Employee or group of Employees is concerned they cannot meet their direct supervisor’s workload expectations and believe their workloads are excessive as per Article 54.01(c), the Employee or group of Employees may raise the concern to the Manager, equivalent position, or designate in writing. The Manager, equivalent position, or designate shall meet with the Employee or group of Employees within fourteen (14) days of the concern being raised to discuss and resolve the concern. The Manager shall provide a reply in writing.
(b) Stage 2 - Director If the Manager and the Employee or group of Employees are unable to resolve the concern at Stage 1, the Union may submit the matter in writing to the appropriate Director, equivalent position, or designate within seven (7) days of receipt of the reply at Stage 1. If satisfied that the concern meets the definition of excessive in Article 54.01(c), the Director, equivalent position, or designate shall meet with the Employee or group of Employees within fourteen (14) days of the concern being raised to discuss and resolve the concern. The Director shall provide a reply in writing within fourteen (14) days of the Stage 2 meeting.
(c) Stage 3 - Workload Review Committee
(i) Each Department will establish at least one (1) Workload Review Committee. At the Deputy Minister’s discretion, additional Workload Review Committees may be established. Workload Review Committees shall be made up of two members: one (1) Employer representative, appointed by the Employer; and one (1) Union representative, appointed by the Union.
(ii) If the Employee or group of Employees is not satisfied with the reply at Stage 2 the Union may, within seven (7) days of receipt of the reply, submit the workload concern in writing to the Office of the appropriate Deputy Minister, who shall assign the review to the appropriate Workload Review Committee.
(iii) The Workload Review Committee shall meet and attempt to reach a consensus recommendation. In the event that the Committee is unable to reach consensus on all items, the Committee shall make a joint recommendation on the items on which consensus has been reached; each Committee member will make separate recommendations on any items where consensus was not reached, all to be provided to the Deputy Minister within thirty (30) days.
(iv) The Deputy Minister, after considering the recommendations, shall make a final and binding decision regarding the workload concern, and ...
Workload Review Process. Where an employee covered by this Agreement has cause to believe that they are being asked to perform more work than is consistent with proper care, they must first give their immediate Supervisor or Designate an opportunity to resolve the issue by reassessing the needs of the team to determine whether realignment of work assignments is required. If the employee is dissatisfied with the resolution, they may:
Workload Review Process. (a) Stage 1 - Manager Where an Employee or group of Employees is concerned they cannot meet their direct supervisor’s workload expectations and believe their workloads are excessive as per Article 54.01(c), the Employee or group of Employees may raise the concern to the Manager, equivalent position, or designate in writing. The Manager, equivalent position, or designate shall meet with the Employee or group of Employees within fourteen
Workload Review Process. Where an Employee or group of Employees are concerned their workloads are excessive, as defined in this letter of understanding, the Employee or group of Employees may raise the concern to the Manager, equivalent position, or designate in writing. The Manager, equivalent position, or designate shall meet with the Employee or group of Employees within ten (10) workdays of the concern being raised to discuss and resolve the concern. The Manager shall provide a response in writing. The time limits in the Workload Review Process may be adjusted by mutual agreement of the Parties. A representative of the Union may assist an Employee or group of Employees during the Workload Review Process. The Workload Review Process is not subject to the Grievance Procedure set out in Article 25. SIGNED THIS DAY OF _ , 2019. ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF ON BEHALF OF LOCAL 039 OF THE GOVERNORS OF THE SOUTHERN ALBERTA UNION OF PROVINCIAL ALBERTA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY EMLPOYEES Chair – ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ President – ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ RE: Use of Agency Staff for Administrative Assistant I and II
Workload Review Process. Step 1 Where an employee, Manager or the Workload Committee identifies that workload is becoming unmanageable they may request a workload review by their immediate manager.
Step 2 A meeting between manager and employee will be held within five (5) working days of the request or such period of time agreed upon by employee and manager. The purpose of the meeting is to develop a plan and address workload issues including agreed upon solutions. The solutions will be in writing and, if mutually agreed, will be signed by all parties with a copy to the Service Director and the Workload Committee. Step 3 If the issue is not resolved in Step 2, the Manager will refer the matter to the Service Director. The Service Director will set a meeting with the employee and the Manager. The employee has the right to have a Union Representative at that meeting, if possible from the Workload Committee. The Manager and Service Director will then either confirm the initial response or offer an alternative resolution.
Workload Review Process. An academic staff member who is dissatisfied with any aspect of their workload shall have recourse to a review process. The review process is designed to seek early resolution, without the need for escalation to a formal dispute process. The academic staff member and the supervisor, Head of School / ▇▇▇▇ (or nominee) has the right to be represented by a person of their choice (other than a practising barrister or solicitor) and to seek the assistance of an employee from Human Resources.
(a) Initially an academic staff member would raise his/her concern with their direct supervisor;
(b) Where the academic staff member remains dissatisfied, he/she may raise their concern with the Head of School (or nominee), or with the relevant ▇▇▇▇ / Director and request a review of their workload.
(c) If following sub-clause (a) and (b) the concern remains unresolved, an academic staff member may use the dispute resolution procedure set out in Clause 69 of this Agreement, commencing with referral to the Executive Director, Human Resources.
Workload Review Process. 1. The Employee may request a workload review meeting with their respective APP Manager and a Union representative(s).
2. Upon receipt of an Employee’s request for workload review, the APP Manager should notify respective PA Service Line Director.
3. Initial outreach to the Employee and their union representative acknowledging receipt will occur within seven (7) calendar days of receipt of a workload review request, and a subsequent “workload review” meeting will be scheduled with the APP Manager, with or without appropriate local physician leadership, as soon as practicable.
4. During this process the Employee, the Union, and Labor Relations will consider additional compensation as a component of the remedy, if the parties or the arbitrator substantiate excess workload.
5. After the conclusion of this process, if the Employee or the Union is not satisfied with the outcome of the Workload Review Process, they may submit the matter for review through the grievance procedure outlined in Article 16 of the UPAMM contract starting at Step 3.