Evaluation of Applications Clause Samples
The 'Evaluation of Applications' clause outlines the process and criteria by which submitted applications will be reviewed and assessed. Typically, this clause specifies the standards, scoring methods, or evaluation panels that will be used to judge the merits of each application, and may detail timelines or required documentation. Its core function is to ensure a transparent, fair, and consistent method for selecting successful applicants, thereby reducing disputes and clarifying expectations for all parties involved.
Evaluation of Applications. 18.1. The Employer will consider the application, conduct an evaluation using the health practitioner work level evaluation manual and work level statements and determine the appropriate classification level for that position.
18.2. Where there is an incumbent, the outcome of the job evaluation process will be reported to the individual employee and work unit manager.
Evaluation of Applications. Applications for professional development leave will be evaluated by the University on the basis of the criteria in Articles 20.01, 20.02 and 20.03 and in the order in which they are received in the office of the Associate Vice-President of Human Resources. Applicants will be advised in writing by the University by March 31 of each year (except in unusual circumstances) whether the professional development leave can be granted. If an application cannot be granted under Article 20.03
(a) considerations, the University may offer the leave in a subsequent year. The University will provide the Association with a report on the first working day in July of each year of the applications for professional development leave received and the status of each application.
Evaluation of Applications. If the application is developed and processed in accordance with § 1980.113 of subpart B of part 1980 of this chapter, the provi- sions outlined in § 1980.114 of subpart B of part 1980 of this chapter applies with the following exceptions:
(i) Timeframe requirements for the evaluation of applications and ref- erences to the Approved Lender Pro- gram are not applicable.
(ii) County Committee reviews of ap- plications processed under this section will not be required. If the loan ap- proval official finds the applicant is not eligible, the applicant will be noti- fied in writing of the reasons for dis- approval and the opportunity given for an appeal as set out in subpart B of part 1900 of this chapter.
Evaluation of Applications. Evaluation Committee Evaluation Criteria
Evaluation of Applications. Once the terms of validity of the notice have elapsed, the Head of AICS office in Nairobi assesses the admissibility of the applications regarding the presence of the essential requirements and the absence of causes for exclusion. The exclusion is communicated to the candidates concerned. Subsequently, the Head of AICS field Office appoints a Commission composed of three members, who meets the requirements for autonomy and impartiality with respect to the candidates. The Commitee assesses the merits of applications by assigning a maximum overall score of 100 points according to the following criteria:
Evaluation of Applications. (a) Applicants who are eligible to respond to a vacancy announcement and submit the required information will be evaluated by the HCMD, Employment and Classification Branch to determine if the applicant meets the minimum qualifications required to satisfactorily perform the duties and responsibilities of the vacant position. Applicants who have not yet satisfied the time in grade requirements may be considered provided they meet the requirements within 45 days of the closing date of the announcement.
(b) Special qualifications requirements may be used when they are determined by the Employer to be essential to the successful performance of the position being filled. If special qualifications requirements are used, they will be listed in the vacancy announcement.
Evaluation of Applications. The Screening Committee will evaluate applications 2 and recommend action to the Vice President of Instruction prior to the March 3 meeting of the Board. The Committee’s evaluation and recommendation will be 4 based solely on the merit of the application as it applies to the purpose of sabbatical 5 leave stated in Section A, Purpose. 6
Evaluation of Applications. If the application is developed and processed in accordance with § 1980.113 of subpart B of this part, the provisions outlined in § 1980.114 of subpart B of this part apply with the following exceptions:
(i) Timeframe requirements for the evaluation of applications and ref- erences to the Approved Lender Pro- gram are not applicable.
(ii) County Committee reviews of ap- plications processed under this section will not be required. If the loan ap- proval official finds the applicant is not eligible, the applicant will be noti- fied in writing of the reasons for dis- approval and his/her rights through in- clusion of the Equal Credit Oppor- tunity Act (ECOA) statement. An op- portunity will be given for an appeal as set out in subpart B of part 1900 of this chapter.
Evaluation of Applications. The Screening Committee will evaluate applications and recommend action to the President. The Committee’s evaluation and recommendation will be based solely on the merit of the application as it applies to the purpose of sabbatical leave stated in ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.
Evaluation of Applications. If the application is developed and processed in accordance with § 1980.113 of subpart B of this part, the provisions outlined in § 1980.114 of subpart B of this part apply with the following exceptions:
(i) Timeframe requirements for the evaluation of applications and ref- erences to the Approved Lender Pro- gram are not applicable.
(ii) County Committee reviews of ap- plications processed under this section will not be required. If the loan ap- proval official finds the applicant is not eligible, the applicant will be noti- fied in writing of the reasons for dis- approval and his/her rights through in- clusion of the Equal Credit Oppor- tunity Act (ECOA) statement. An op- portunity will be given for an appeal as set out in subpart B of part 1900 of this chapter.
(iii) When applied to BIB applica- tions, references in § 1980.114 of this part to ‘‘County Office’’ shall normally be construed to mean ‘‘State Office.’’ References to ‘‘County Supervisor’’ shall be construed to mean ‘‘Business and Industry Chief or Community and Business Programs Chief, or other ap- propriate FmHA or its successor agen- cy under Public Law 103–354 official as designated by the State Director.’’